I got the long form census this year. Question 30 is about religion. The way it’s presented I could have answered with my childhood church, thereby validating/perpetuating it, but that doesn’t reflect my adult self. Click the link, study the suggestions and answer accurately.
If anyone else is doing the long form and could get screen shots of both “question 30” and the “list” I’d be obliged.
30. What is this person's religion?
Indicate a specific denomination or religion even if this person is not currently a practising member of that group.

1/
For example, Roman Catholic, United Church, Anglican, Muslim, Baptist, Hindu, Pentecostal, Lutheran, Presbyterian, Sikh, Buddhist, Jewish, Greek Orthodox, etc.
For additional examples of denominations and religions, visit...

2/
Choices are:

•Specify one denomination or religion only.
or
◦No religion

3/
I pulled that off the webpage statcan.gc.ca/eng/statistica…

Following the word visit is an URL that is not a link! In other words, for this particular presentation you have to copy the URL text and paste it into the address bar. This is a barrier to use. Why? www12.statcan.gc.ca/religion-e
As mentioned earlier if you’re completing the census online you can click a live link and get the list of denominations and religions in a new window.

My questions
• if Raelian is included why isn’t Pastafarianism?
• what is the reason for such a elaborate example list?
• why is the census, something I think of as a national statistical snapshot, asking for an religion “even if this person is not currently a practising member of that group”?

Isn’t religion a practice?

Why ask about the past? - That’s what previous censuses are for.
• what is the value in asking about a *specific* denomination when you’re only sampling a percentage of the population.

• does the way the question is asked risk skewing the results to make religion more dominant in Canadian profile and policy than is representative?
cui bono?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mark Woolley

Mark Woolley Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @perspicuity1

28 Apr
@namasaya @CityPtbo @ReImaginePtbo @NoParkway Outcome as reported on FB: The Earth moved a little last night at Peterborough City Council. Prompted by many weekend messages and a dozen informed, engaged speakers, Councillors changed the direction of Peterborough's new Transportation Master Plan.
@namasaya @CityPtbo @ReImaginePtbo @NoParkway 2/ By a 9-2 vote Council directed staff and consultants to make the top four priorities of the new plan the safety of the system, mode shift away from the car, greenhouse gas emission reductions, and maintenance of existing roads over expensive new road projects (The Parkway).
@namasaya @CityPtbo @ReImaginePtbo @NoParkway 3/ Councillors agreed that in the context of climate change it is not good enough to accept a car-centric, business-as-usual report that offered them an undifferentiated list of 34 goals, with no targets and no named priorities.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(