$EEENF DILUTION CONCERNS ADDRESSED:

ASX Listing Rules under the Corporations Act state that an ASX company can raise capital BUT NOT at the expense of unfairly diluting shareholders. Thus, a maximum 15% Increase is allowed per every 12 month period. This is a Corporate Right.
$EEENF To make it easier for small to mid-cap entities to raise additional capital, Listing Rule 7.1A was introduced in 2012, to which SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL is required to raise this limit an additional 10% for the next 12 month period. This increase HAS to be renewed at every AGM
$EEENF These are two SEPERATE Placement Capacities (15% & 10%). They are NOT Inclusive of one another, meaning the company cannot issue securities totaling 25% in one shot. Also, this DOES NOT MEAN they will issue the full 25%. It's simply a Corp's right to have this flexibility.
$EEENF Attached are Last Year's AGM voting results (Held April 9th, 2020). 76.56% of Share Holders APPROVED the additional 10% Placement Capacity Mandate. They also RATIFIED all previous Security Placements (AKA confirmed their consent on the Issuing of Shares for Operations).
$EEENF With the 15% & 10% Placement Capacities, what did the company do? In 3 separate issues of securities, 88E Raised a total of $27,124,400, and spent $8,000,000 on Merlin operations. The remaining $19,124,000 will be used on further Merlin Ops, Harrier drilling, & Umiat.
$EEENF Why Umiat? As per the acquisition agreement, one of the conditions of the unit "stipulate a well commitment (exploration or appraisal) by August 31st, 2022. This is a project they must conduct next year in order to keep the leases, and the Capital raised will fund this.
$EEENF If there's cash in hand for Merlin, Harrier, and Umiat fieldwork, why are they requesting to exercise the 7.1A mandate at this years AGM for the 10% capacity increase? They plan on Production Testing Charlie-1 exploration well & to "pursue new opportunities that may arise"
$EEENF Aside from raising funds, what else can they use the 15% Placement Capacity for? Acquisitions! This is how they obtained Project Peregrine acreage in the first place in an off-market takeover bid from XCD Energy Limited. Money well spent. The placements are transparent.
$EEENF In the past year, 88E has aggressively acquired & expanded their asset portfolio. Peregrine & Umiat are the most notable, along with the under-the-radar purchase of 24,000 Acres in the ANWR region on January 6th. In one year, 88E more than doubled their footprint up North.
$EEENF The Alaska Department of Natural Resources will conduct a lease sale during the second 1/2 of 2021 on the North Slope that comprises of 5.1 Million Acres over 3,121 tracts. 88 likes to use Placement Funds to acquire new leases, so we can expect to add more assets this year
$EEENF SO, What's my point?

ASX is NOT the OTC. They have rules & regulations in place to protect shareholders, where transparency is forced and limitations are imposed. They have a plan which is executed WITH THE CONSENT of Shareholders.

Hope this helped address any concerns

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with PokeStonksTrainer

PokeStonksTrainer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HarisRad88

5 May
$EEENF Cocono Phillips' Willow prospect is currently halted & being sued by environmentalists due to "irreparable harm" that it can cause to the landscape and Polar-Bear/Marine-Mammal populations in the area from its development, citing violations to the Endangered Species Act.
$EEENF Environmentalists note declining population of Polar Bears (+ other Marine Mammals) in the Southern Beaufort Sea region. Declining sea ice endangers critical habitats & Polar Bears are being forced inland to den. Not a single Polar Bear can be killed per the MMPA.
$EEENF "We do not anticipate" DOES NOT EQUAL "Cannot Happen". Endangerment of Polar Bears (& Others) will remain a threat in the "Action Area" (Area of development where threat exists to critical habitats). Future development will go on, but alternative locations may be sought.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(