The implications of this school re-opening study in Texas are ghastly when you peel it back. What it says is that children themselves didn’t cause much spread attending school, but when they did go to school, their parents then left the house for work /1 nber.org/papers/w28753
So the point is that Texas couldn’t (and didn’t actually try to) persuade parents to stay home or to let workers stay home and still collect paychecks. But if you ban kids from school, then you force parents to stay home to care for them. That’s an awfully sketchy way to do it.
Children’s well being shouldn’t be sacrificed to achieve a secondary policy goal of getting parents to stay home. If that’s your policy goal, do it directly, dont use kids as your tools.
Exactly, but TX was actively hostile toward measures like this

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ryan Grim

Ryan Grim Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ryangrim

5 May
Western Mass media still attacking Alex Morse even after he's gone -- this time for donating surplus campaign money to a homeless shelter and other nonprofits in Cape Cod masslive.com/news/2021/05/f… Image
I can't for the life of me imagine why Morse might rather be generous to Cape Cod, where he's now the town manager, than to the place that treated him with such respect and dignity (and that sees fit to complain that his new salary is much more than he made as the town's mayor)
This is the FRONT PAGE of the paper (home page of the website, whatever) Image
Read 4 tweets
11 Apr
Anybody who's been fuming about substack should be embarrassed after they absorb this uncontroversial point from @benyt. It's just an email service provider that links to a payment processor. nytimes.com/2021/04/11/bus…
Actually, you don't have to be embarrassed, I'm embarrassed for you, so I've saved you the trouble.
Hey, subscribe to my substack.

Or don't! See how easy that was? badnews.substack.com
Read 7 tweets
11 Apr
There's a lot of competition, but my favorite Boehner story ever hasn't been told, I don't think, and I highly doubt he includes it in his memoir. So here goes:
As House Speaker, he had access to a car and driver. So after he resigned under pressure from the Freedom Caucus, he reached out to a former colleague and asked him how he got around the city without a driver. His friend, also old and not tech savvy, told him Uber...
Boehner couldn't figure out how to download it and set up his account, so his old man friend helped him.

A few weeks later, he asked Boehner how he was liking Uber. Boehner told him it was great, but found it weird that the driver would randomly pick up other passengers...
Read 7 tweets
9 Apr
A spokesperson for @AOC says they did not report this post to police, and have asked for answers from Capitol Police: "No, not at all. But when we saw his tweets last night about being visited we asked Capitol Police to look into what happened here."
Will update when I know more from Twitter and the Capitol Police
That police did show up at this person's door over a post about AOC is confirmed. The open question is who sent them and why. If AOC was actually responsible for it and denied it, Capitol Police would eagerly out her, so her denial has serious credibility.
Read 5 tweets
8 Apr
Huge scoop here: Amazon pressured the USPS to install a private mailbox at its facility so they could pressure workers to bring their ballots to work, enabling them to monitor for no votes. This election is tainted and these executives should be investigated
If you have inside info on this you know what to do
In case that wasn’t clear
Read 5 tweets
8 Apr
In the early ‘50s, the CIA printed fake leaflets pretending to be from Communist Hukbo rebels, who were waging an armed struggled but also had massive popular support and were poised to sweep elections. The leaflets urged all supporters to boycott the elections. It worked /1
Senior leaders thought they were real and zealously embraced the idea that the elections were a colonizer trap, etc. Losing the election was a huge moment and helped break the back of the insurgency. If you guessed at the time the CIA did it you’d have been right.
This was in the Philippines btw
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(