Some highlights from yesterday's Victory Day parade on Red Square.
Russian USN SBP FSO officers providing security over Red Square with an ORSIS T-5000. 2/ t.me/ok_spn/11887
Video of the aerial portion of the parade with Mi-26, Mi-8AMTSh, Mi-35, Mi-24, Ka-52, and Mi-28N helicopters; Il-76, Tu-95MS, Il-78, and Tu-160 aircraft. 3/ t.me/tv360/56576
Tu-160, Su-35S, Su-24, MiG-31K with Kinzhal dummy missiles, Su-57, Su-34, Su-30SM, and MiG-29 aircraft. This included the Vityazi and Strizhi aerobatic teams. 4/ t.me/tv360/56576
The aerial portion concluded with Su-25BM. 5/
Military equipment staging on Tverskaya before the parade. 6/
T-34-85 tanks on Red Square. 8/
Photos: Евгений Биятов and Сергей Гунеев vk.com/milinfolive?w=…
Then came Typhoon-PVO, Typhoon-VDV, BMP-2M with Berezhok turrets, BM-11 Kurganets-25 with Epokha turrets, BMP-3, T-72B3M, and T-80BVM. 9/ tvzvezda.ru/news/202159112…
Video of an armored column with at least 8 tanks and armored vehicles from the Russian VDV's 51st Airborne Regiment assaulting Snagost in Kursk oblast. It appears Russia was able to get the armored force across the Seym River, despite Ukrainian strikes on the bridges. @Deepstate_UA says the situation has worsened on Ukraine's left flank in Kursk oblast.
"Iran has sent short-range ballistic missiles to Russia, a move that will give Moscow another potent military tool to use in the war against Ukraine and follows stern Western warnings not to provide those arms to Moscow, according to U.S. and European officials." @wstrobel @mgordonwsj @laurnorman wsj.com/world/u-s-tell…
"A U.S. official confirmed the missiles 'have finally been delivered'...
The shipment involves a couple of hundred short-range ballistic missiles, according to Western officials. Iran has a variety of such weapons, with a range stretching up to around 500 miles.
'This is not the end,' a senior European official said, noting that Iran is expected to keep weapons flowing into Russia"
.@AlbertoNardelli and @nat_droz also report that Iran has sent ballistic missiles to Russia. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
I think Biddle is right that authorizing the use of longer-range strikes into Russia wouldn't be decisive on its own, but I also think this is an unfair burden to apply to the delivery of weapons or restrictions. People often say sanctions are ineffective if they fail to deter or stop a war, but they can still make it more difficult for the target to wage that war.
Most of Russia's Su-34 glide bomb carriers are no longer operated from airbases within ATACMS or Storm Shadow range; however, the S-300/S-400 that struck Kharkiv yesterday would be within range of ATACMS, and air defenses have a priority ATACMS target in occupied areas. One of the main benefits of allowing HIMARS' GMLRS strikes into Russian territory after the Kharkiv offensive began was that Kharkiv gained a reprieve from S-300/S-400 strikes. It seems that is no longer the case.
Of course, allowing these strikes would help Ukraine hold the buffer zone in Kursk, which could become more difficult this winter. It's also worth noting that Ukraine's campaign of targeting Russian infrastructure is being accomplished with Ukrainian-built UAVs and missiles.