Qp/Qs represents a RATIO of blood flow through the pulmonary to systemic circulations.
Assuming 🚫 intracardiac shunt, pulmonary = system blood flow. Here Qp/Qs ~1.
It is a closed ⚡️ circuit after all!
But what if there is an ASD or VSD or even delayed post-MI complications??
Let's start with the basics --
Remember the Fick Equation?
Recall that you can calculate 🩸 blood flow to an organ by knowing oxygen consumption and ateriovenous oxygen difference.
Most often we are interested in assessing systemic cardiac output.
Here -
VO2 is oxygen consumption
Ca is arterial oxygen content
Cv is venous oxygen content
Remember oxygen CONTENT is not the same as oxygen SATURATION.
Moving forward, let's assume our oxygen consumption, atmospheric pressure, and hemoglobin are constant, ok? 🙌🙌
💡💡💡If we use the difference in oxygen content across the pulmonary and the systemic circulations, we can then calculate the blood flow through the pulmonary and systemic circulations, individually.
If we suspect an intracardiac L ➡️ R shunt, then more blood flows through the pulmonary than the systemic circulation.
In other words, the ratio of blood flow through the pulmonary to the systemic circulation (also known as the Qp/Qs ratio) will be >1.
So how do we collect all these values?
We perform a shunt run via a right heart cath. We measure oxygen saturation at the following stops:
1. Pulmonary artery 2. Right ventricle 3. Right atrium 4. IVC 5. SVC 6. Aorta
When do we suspect a L to R shunt?
If we see a ⚠️ 7% increase in O2 sat between chambers at the level of the RA or great veins
OR
If we see a ⚠️ 5% increase in O2 sat distal to the RA and great arteries
But wait, what about the pulmonary venous sat?
Getting a true pulm venous O2 sat requires transseptal puncture or retrograde cath, so we substitute for the systemic arterial O2 sat (in the proximal aorta) or PCWP sat
Assuming no R ➡️ L shunting, these should be pretty similar
If we do think there is R ➡️ L shunting, we can either assume the pulmonary venous sat is 95%
OR
directly measure the pulmonary venous sat (via a wedge sat, a transseptal approach to measure the LA sat, and compare to Ao sat).
Lastly --
A L to R shunt (e.g., ASD) will affect the mixed venous sat, so don't forget to calculate a pre-shunt MvO2 by Flamm's 🔥 formula.
(3 x SVC O2 + IVC O2) / 4
We use this value for the mixed venous oxygen sat in our shunt ratio equation.
Ok, now we have all the data that we need to calculate our shunt fraction.
We can use Qp/Qs to determine the hemodynamic significance of shunts.
If Qp/Qs <1, net R ➡️ L shunt.
If Qp/Qs = 1.0 -1.5, small L ➡️ R shunt.
If Qp/ Qs >2.0, very large L ➡️ R shunt. It may warrant surgical intervention to prevent pulmonary vascular disease and RV overload.
Qp/Qs can also be calculated via non-invasive methods, including cardiac MRI.
Cardiac MRI allows for the calculation of velocity-time curves and therefore blood flow.
We can also calculate a shunt ratio using traditional echocardiography. All you need is the LVOT and RVOT diameter, as well as the LVOT and RVOT velocity time integral.
Let's save that math for another day…! ➗ ♾ 🧮
So let's summarize!
Today, we discussed
⚠️ the physiology behind the shunt fraction
⚠️ what values to collect on a RHC shunt run
⚠️ how to measure a Qp/Qs without a cardiac cath
Back to where we started --
Now, how many of you agree with the following statement.
"I feel comfortable with how to calculate the shunt fraction for an intracardiac shunt."
"I learned something in this Tweetorial that may change my clinical practice."
What has been your experience with intracardiac shunts?
What is your preferred method for measuring a Qp/Qs?
Any common pitfalls you see folks fall into?
I can never thank the @CardioNerds leadership enough for the support and feedback! 🔥 🌟🙌