This is a fascinating and deeply researched history of Rosenberger v. Rectors and Visitors of the University of Virginia, decided in 1995. @Rachael_e_Jones is the first, to my knowledge, to make use of archival papers related to the case. She has some finds that will be ... /1
of interest to legal historians, church/state scholars, and those interested in @UVA history. The article gives a detailed account how the case was litigated at a critical moment in the development of Establishment Clause doctrine over the past several decades. /2
In recounting Rosenberger's history, @Rachael_e_Jones discusses a letter that she discovered in the archives. On Nov. 9, 1989, Justice Scalia wrote to Robert O'Neil, then president of @UVA, who had invited the justice to receive the Thomas Jefferson Award, UVA's highest honor. /3
In his letter, Justice Scalia criticized UVA for rejecting admission of three of his children. He concluded by saying: "I will not accept the Jefferson Award, or anything else, from the University of Virginia. Not now. Not ever." /4
Relations between Justice Scalia and UVA improved over the years, and the justice did eventually accept the Jefferson Medal in Law in 2008. /5 news.virginia.edu/content/justic…
But the Nov. 1989 letter raised an interesting question about whether Scalia should have recused himself in Rosenberger. The case was decided 5-4. Had Scalia recused, the result likely would have been 4-4, leaving in place the Fourth Circuit's decision in favor of UVA. /6
There seems to be some confusion about how religious organizations are treated under the CARES Act and PPP, which established emergency loans for small businesses and nonprofits. There are two separate issues here: /2
1. @SBAgov rules initially restricted aid to religious nonprofits, including houses of worship. But SBA announced that it would not enforce those rules and would propose to amend them in line with constitutional doctrine. sba.gov/sites/default/… /3
In light of Espinoza today, it is worth remembering that Lemon v Kurtzman was initially litigated in 1969 on establishment clause *and* equal protection (race discrimination) grounds. Alton Lemon was a named plaintiff, along with the Pennsylvania NAACP, PA ACLU and others. /1
I mention this in part because both the Court and Justice Alito discuss the history of anti-Catholic bigotry, relying in part on this excellent and important article by John Jeffries and Jim Ryan (J&R), A Political History of the Establishment Clause repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewconten… /2
If you read @DouthatNYT yesterday, you might be wondering: Did I miss a Wiccan invasion? What's with all the talk about pagans and paganism? Thought I might give some background, but this is going to be long ... /1
@Douthat profiles a recent book by Steven D. Smith, "Pagans and Christians in the City." Smith's project is to recover T.S. Eliot's "idea of a Christian society" from the late-1930s. Eliot thought that western societies were marked by a conflict between Christians and pagans. /2
For Eliot, Christians believe in orthodox, traditional religion. Everyone who doesn't share that belief is either a pagan or on the road to paganism. You can read about it here: amazon.com/Christianity-C… /3