In principle, a right to "routes of appeal" when social media companies remove hateful content seems fine, if they are allowed to remove content when it violates platform rules (including ruling some extreme content that is legal, such as holocaust denial, anti-semitism, racism)
These are Twitter examples of tweets they now ban. ("Dehumanising"). A route to appeal decisions is fine, but these type of decisions should be able to be made for legal but extreme speech of this nature.
An stupidly unworkable version of this idea was published by @SpeechUnion in their local elections manifesto, which proposed fining Twitter/Facebook if they deleted & refused to restore tweets saying "the Jews are vermin" or "deport all the blacks" etc
It seems an incoherent, illogical and workable proposal that academics should be prevented (in the name of free speech) from publicly praising/criticising the work of Professor Nigel Biggar or the work of Professor Gopal or the work of Professor David Miller
Here is the letter cited. The question is what would happen differently, under the govt proposals. (Would this letter be allowed or prevented? Would Biggar's responses be allowed? Would responses to his responses be allowed? Could people/instns be fined?) google.co.uk/amp/s/theconve…
A former DfE Spad comments on the apparent tensions here
I would be keen to have wide boundaries (reflected in Cardiff Uni standing up for Germaine Greer being heard) but there are good reasons too for boundaries on the campus presence of eg Anjem Choudary and Hizb-ut-Tahrir, Britain First racists, David Irving's holocaust revisionism
It may be that judge's verdict in lost libel case that Irving brought (voluntarily) is useful evidence for a reasoned decision to exclude. Or would advocates of this new law insist that universities must host holocaust revisionism or denial (both are legal, but extreme, speech)?
This section of the @SpeechUnion local election manifesto would establish new legal rights to have holocaust denial and neo-nazi content published on Facebook and private platforms. I can not see the government following that (given it is insisting universities sign up to IHRA)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Can @Nigel_Farage or @TiceRichard or @Towler confirm if Reform yesterday suspended this extreme far right candidate Leslie Lilley running in Southend East. Can never been a clearer open & shut case of need to suspend immediately - unless the new party policy is now pro-fascist
An excessive amount of laughter in GB News clip, but 2/3 of them are clear you'd have to suspend this. Leo Kearse more mixed;whataboutery + blames those who called Reform racists for the racists;"wouldn't it be funny to see this guy stand up in parliament"
This extreme Reform candidate wrote "gas" with several laughing emojis on a picture of Muslims praying - on the Facebook page he runs his Reform parliamentary campaign from - as well as his violent fantasies about killing migrants and advocating for the death of asylum seekers
It's interesting Martin so puzzled by why anti-immigration pitches are much harder to make to young British than young French people. His analysis ("identity politics") is a Very Online/Media Talking Point misperception of causality. The actual drivers offer important insights.
Big driver is UK has comparatively much better integration outcomes than France - for migrants & esp UK-born children (grandchildren) of migrants. In education, in residential segregation, in work, contact. Has big impacts on intergroup relations among young people at school. FT
Vg 2017 paper by @ProfSobolewska illuminates a key consequence. Collapse in overt prejudice over generations reflects a deeper reciprocal change: "social distance" between the majority and minority groups much reduced, both ways around, with more contact academia.edu/34481657/Is_et…
Seems to be a trend towards large NGOs in Britain adopting "global majority" communities (to talk about all people who aren't white).
I think organisations should not adopt until have checked
- do most people understand the term?
- do most people it is being used about approve?
I would welcome your views about this term: for, against or neutral.
I am v.sceptical about it & don't identity with it (though I am in the 85% of people on this planet it is grouping together). Here are some of my reasons for finding it unfamiliar, incoherent and regressive.
1. Organisations should try to use language that most people understand (across different ages, levels of education, social class)
People can argue for novel, unfamiliar terms & try to build awareness. Only a small group - mainly uni graduates - will know this term.
There is a persistent pattern of CCHQ/government investigations burying very serious issues (including credible allegations of criminality) until they act rapidly, after exposure in the media, months after knowing the content
Sexual assault of a minor. CCHQ received this allegation before Dec 2019 election but did not investigate. Victim went to police instead after the election. MP Khan (Wakefield) suspended by party 15 months later, when charged & expelled him in 2022 after he was convicted in court
Spoke to Guardian about this. My view is politics of dealignment have been v successful for Labour - advancing most where weaker - & & time for a change will hold most core votes too. Bigger challenge to come in trying to retain that coalition in power theguardian.com/politics/2024/…
Excellent visualisation by @Dylan_Difford of Labour's advances 2019-24
In 2024 this is an "every silver lining has a cloud" thought. No risk to 99%+ of Lab-held seats, though Greens hope to challenge in Bristol. A 10%+ swing would sweep all target seats
Maybe turnout worries with young voters if many people thought result was foregone conclusion.
Sunday Telegraph news report on a poll of British Muslim attitudes, with comments from Fiyaz Mughal responding to it. This survey found that 4/10 Muslim respondents say Hamas did not commit atrocities on October 7th. Thread on these findings follows. telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/04/0…
The poll results are published here by JL Partners. It was conducted for the Henry Jackson Society. (HJS don't seem to have published a report; there is nothing I could find on their website or socials beyond media reports/press releaase) jlpartners.com/polling-results
Press release note = what is avaiable on the methodology. It is tricky to sample Muslims & other minority groups. JL Partners have used Number Cruncher/Matt Singh who are good at this. Eg, 14th Feb - 12th March period is one way to avoid over-sampling the highly engaged.