The US & other countries should continue to pressure on Israel to halt all actions in E. Jerusalem, including the eviction of Palestinians. They can do this while also calling on Hamas to stop firing at Israel & Israel to stop firing back, unless it's anti-missile defense
The violence is escalating. We're also entering a "doubling down" phase, wherein the Israeli gov't might use Hamas' attacks on Israeli civilians to refuse to back down from actions in E. Jerusalem. The US & other nations need to be clear: what's going on in E. Jerusalem is unjust
-Israel should not be firing at civilians
-Hamas should not be firing at civilians
-What was happening in E. Jerusalem was unjust *before* Hamas' retaliation
-You can judge Hamas' actions as "bad" and simultaneously declare Israel's preceding actions in E. Jerusalem as bad.
This is a case where states might fear calling out Israel's actions in E. Jerusalem b/c they think it means they are conceding to a group (Hamas) who are attacking civilians. It doesn't have to be that way. Israel's actions in E. Jerusalem were bad *before* Hamas fired missiles
And, finally, again, stop saying Hamas speaks for all Palestinians. They do not.
It's true that many of Hamas's armed sites are in heavily populated areas (they should be pressured to move them). That said, it doesn't mean Israel has carte blanche to fire on these same areas, even if you think they have a right to fire back. Civilians have to be considered.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mangy Jay

Mangy Jay Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @magi_jay

14 May
So I've seen a few accounts say that the Biden admin supports what's being done to the Palestinians and I think that's not the whole story. Before the current escalation, the U.S. was condemning Israel for evictions in East Jerusalem. Netanyahu ignored it. ImageImage
Now, is the U.S. currently doing enough? Probably not. But they did speak out against the evictions in East Jerusalem and we should 1. support them in this cause & 2. push them to go further. Saying they support the actions is false and helps no one.
Let's develop a coherent policy message for what the U.S. can do right now. They are opposed to the actions in East Jerusalem. How do we make this into a singular message? Misrepresentation does nothing.
Read 5 tweets
13 May
I don't really care about Glem, but, since I see others make this mistake all the time, let me say: this is not how racism or sexism work. You cannot just say people liked one Black person or one woman once and therefore their brains are free from racism or sexism ImageImage
There are at least two interrelated phenomena here. Men can approve of some women, but disapprove of others for reasons that arise from sexism. Think: cool girl syndrome. Same thing for white people vis a vis Black people. "Oh, well he's a *different* kind of Black man."
The other thing that both women & POC experience is that even if they are "accepted" for a while, they get rejected more and more over time. This is especially true if they ascend to positions of power, which is 1 reason why Obama's 2009 approval devolved into the 2010 midterms
Read 5 tweets
12 May
When I talk about Western discourse on Israel/Palestine, people often respond, "I'm afraid to talk about it b/c I can't criticize Israel w/out being accused of anti-semitism." I have not had this experience, myself. And people shouldn't say this for a number of reasons.
1st, the statement invokes bad connotations, specifically about Jewish people making false accusations of anti-semitism. 2nd, it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy, such that others could be discouraged from criticizing Israel.
My advice?
-Keep your statements focussed on the Israeli government. If you want to make a comment about Israeli public opinion, you should have data to support it. Be specific & evidence-based.
-Do not equate Israel w/ Jewish people in other countries.
Read 7 tweets
11 May
American conversations about Israel-Palestine are rife w/ confusion and various bigotries. Sometimes they veer into anti-semitism. Almost universally they reflect a lack of understanding of Palestinian politics, such as the frequent equation of Hamas w/ all of Palestine.
Unfortunately, all of this renders the conversations counter-productive, w/ many Americans being performative and/or un-nuanced. Others then hide from the convo and we don't develop a productive set of messages for what we want our leadership to do.
This all ends up being worse for the Palestinian people, b/c we don't have a coherent campaign to help them. It would be good for us to try to improve this convo. I think one way to change this situation is to focus on narrow concerns in specific cases of violence/tension. . . .
Read 15 tweets
11 May
"Twitter facilitates an odd kind of derangement about specific people."
"So true. There's a real psycho-social phenomenon to examine here."
"Well put. And, if you think about it, the real origin of these harmful dynamics can likely be traced back to. . . Hillary Clinton."
I barely know what's going on here. I dislike EB, but didn't hate her column. She's just generally not a nice person. I also didn't like Doyle's tweet. Can't address GG bc that would feel like putting my brain in a mammogram device. Have no idea what Clinton has to do w/ anything
(I didn't read the full column; just excerpts. It didn't bother me. She's still not a very nice person)
Read 4 tweets
10 May
Here is my new piece for @AlterNet. Some research came out recently and a lot of people used it to argue that Democrats should not mention race/racism in policy because doing so would be detrimental. The problem? That's not what the research said alternet.org/2021/05/demcor…
So many tweets and headlines carried the same message: mentioning race would hurt Democrats. But the research didn't find that. Mentioning race didn't hurt Democrats w/ all voters, it only hurt them with the subset of Republicans. Yet here were the headlines:
Even the NYTimes goofed this one up. They said mentioning race decreased support among independents for Democratic policies and neglected to include the fact that this was *not* statistically significant and was therefore not an actual effect.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(