The govt set out 4 tests for proceeding each stage of the roadmap. Tests 1 & 2 relate to vaccination, test 3 is hospitals in no danger of being overwhelmed and test 4 is that there are no new variant concerns.
Test 1-3 have been (easily) met, but I don't think Test 4 has. 2/18
Last Friday, Public Health England designated B.1.617.2 (an "Indian" variant) as a variant of concern because of worries that it was more transmissible than B.1.1.7 ("Kent") and cos we didn't know much about its response to vaccines.
What has happened since? 3/18
Yesterday new modelling from SAGE SPI-M was released. While they showed that risks of stage 3 of roadmap was much lower with current Kent variant (given high efficacy of vaccines), those risks could *return* for a new variant. assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl… 4/18
In particular, Warwick model (link above) estimated that moving to step 3 of the roadmap risks hsopitals being overwhelmed as in January for a variant just as susceptible to the vaccines *but* 50% more transmissible than our dominant "Kent" variant. 5/18
Having some vaccine escape (even if still protective for severe disease) can also lead to damaging new surges.
SAGE SPI-M emphasise the importance of stopping the spread of any such variant.
There have been some estimates that B.1.617.2 is up to 60% more transmissible than Kent (B117)
Admittedly these are based on not great international sequencing data - but it is all we have to go on + we know that much of S Asia in a dire situation.
The UK Covid genomics consortium (COG UK) released latest data today. It includes sequenced cases from travellers to UK & surge testing, some duplicates & about half of community cases.
Week to 1 May in England, there were 678 cases compared to 365 prev week - almost double 8/18
Proportionally, B.1.617.2 was 14% of sequences cases in England. The incomplete data since 1 May is showing the same trend continuing.
In the last week B.1.617.2 was 4% cases in Scotland and 2% in Wales. (No data on NI). 9/18
The Sanger Institute takes COG UK data and removed traveller and surge testing data to try to get at what is happening in community. This removes c. half of cases of B.1.617.2.
But exactly the same pattern persists - over 10% of cases in England are B.1.617.2 w/e 1 May. 10/18
Regionally in England these are concentrated in NW, London and East of England.
Daily average cases in England overall have started consistently going up over the past week as well. 11/18
In areas where B.1.617.2 is most concentrated, cases are going up particularly rapidly - e.g. below is Bolton where in most recent week B.1.617.2 was almost 70% of cases.
(HT to @dgurdasani1 for highlighing this chart) 12/18
So England growth is entirely consistent with increased transmissibility & a situation where B.1.617.2 is rapidly gaining dominance.
We don't yet know enough about vax & B.1.617.2 but there are reports now of some breakthrough symptomatic cases channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore… 13/18
And @GuptaR_lab was quoted in Byline Times today suggesting a delay to the roadmap over concerns about vaccine effectiveness - he stressed that we need to learn more.
Meanwhile, same Warwick SAGE model estimated that if we stayed at stage 2 of roadmap (i.e now) any summer surge would be *much* lower (max ~200 hospital admissions a day instead of over 4000).
SAGE also emphasised that the more people are vaccinated, the lower any surge. 15/18
To me, this means that the assessment of the risks IS fundamentally changed by new variants of concern - and so test 4 is failed.
I think we need to either be sure that B.1.617.2 is not a threat OR stamp it out while (if) we still can & vax more quickly. 16/18
This means much stronger contact tracing and supported isolation, wider list of symptoms for PCR tests, support for local communities in tackling outbreaks inc maximising vax uptake there.
I also think moving to stage 3 of roadmap right now risks adding fuel to the fire. 17/18
Personally, I would like to slow down now to reduce chance of reversing the map later risking more uncertainty, more damaging closures and longer recovery from a worse situation.
We need to learn from previous experience. 18/18
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The pandemic is as bad as it ever was for babies - in year to Aug 2023, 6,300 babies under 1 were admitted to hospital wholly or partly BECAUSE of Covid.
They are ONLY age group where admissions have NOT gone down over time 1/17
Our study, led by Prof @katebrown220, looked at all hospitalisations in England in children with a Covid diagnosis or positive test from Aug 2020-Aug 2023.
We then *excluded* all admissions where a Covid diagnosis was incidental (ie not why they were in hospital)
2/17
Infants (babies under 1) are generally at higher risk from respiratory infections, plus they are the age group that, if infected, are overwhelmingly meeting the virus for the first time.
They are not vaccinated and have not had it before. 3/17
Prof @Kevin_Fong giving the most devastating and moving testimony to the Covid Inquiry of visiting hospital intensive care units at the height of the second wave in late Dec 2020.
The unimaginable scale of death, the trauma, the loss of hope.
Please watch this 2min clip.
And here he breaks down while explaining the absolute trauma experienced by smaller hospitals in particular - the "healthier" ICU patients were transferred out, leaving them coping with so much death.
They felt so alone.
Here Prof Fong explains how every nurse he met was traumatised by watching patients die, being only able to hold up ipads to their relatives and how it went against their normal practice of trying to ensure a dignified death, with family there.
🧵War causes direct civilian deaths but also indirect deaths over the following years.
Recent paper estimates eventual total direct & indirect deaths in Gaza attributable to the war - 10% of entire pop'n.
I want to explain these estimates and why deaths must be counted. 1/13
Why count casualties from war anyway? For moral, legal and strategic reasons.
1 - owe it to those who have died
2 - International law says must count & identify dead as far as possible
3 - monitor progress of war & learn from tactics
2/13
There are direct and indirect casualties of war. Direct deaths include those who killed by fighting or bombs.
Indirect deaths are those that die when they would otherwise have lived because of one or more of: lack of food, healthcare, housing, sanitation, income, hope. 3/13
THREAD: the summer Covid wave in the UK continues.
Basically, there is a LOT of Covid around and not a lot of other respiratory viruses.
If you have cold or flu symptoms, it's probably Covid.
The latest hospital data from England shows steady, quite high levels. 1/8
But admissions don't tell us how much virus is circulating more generally. The best (but imperfect) measure we have is wasterwater measurements, and only in Scotland and not England.
Scotland's wastewater is showing a huge July peak - highest since Omicron's 1st yr in 2022 2/8
Because different people shed different amounts of virus and variants can matter too, you can't for sure infer how many people were infected between different wasterwater peaks. BUT given the size, I'd say it's pretty likely this is the largest peak since 2022 in Scotland 3/8