While many people cite that 76% of Bitcoin miners use renewable energy, that’s not entirely correct.

Yes 76% of miners use renewables as part of their energy mix, but only 39% of mining comes from renewable sources.

In any case however this criticism still misses the point.

1/
This criticism is often birthed from the belief that what Bitcoin mining goes towards isn’t valuable.

“If Bitcoin is a useless technology, then why are we burning all this energy?”
There’s two pushbacks I have here.

1. What is the value of a fixed supply digital commodity money that cannot be seized, censored, or corrupted and can be trivially verified and transferred around the world in seconds?

What if everyone in the world had access to this asset?
2. How much does Bitcoin really cost when properly compared to other monetary assets such as fiat currencies which require entire armies to run?

Just look at government spending for the answer.
With the above in mind, it seems pretty clear to me that there’s value in a peaceful decentralized money that is open to everyone in the world.
All this said, of course if we could achieve a similar outcome without the extreme energy demands that would be desirable.

This is part of why many people in crypto are excited by a newer and increasingly popular way of securing blockchains called Proof of Stake.
Proof of Stake eliminates the mining process and instead replaces it with a new consensus mechanism based on validators economic stakes in the network.

Ethereum is the largest project shifting to this consensus mechanism in the coming months.

messari.io/road-to-eth2
Proof of Stake promises to increase Ethereum’s security, energy efficiency, and reduce its centralization risk from miners.

It also aims to ensure participation in the consensus process remains as maximally democratic and open as possible.
There are now dozens of Proof of Stake blockchains in existence.

And while newer, the security model continues to become more proven with time.
In any case whether it’s mining or staking we’re still marching towards the common goal of a more open and fair financial system.

Always keep that in mind before criticizing this industry at a surface level.

This isn’t some stupid scheme to destroy our environment.
The report I pulled the data from is here jbs.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/upl…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ryan Watkins

Ryan Watkins Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RyanWatkins_

23 Apr
In Q1 2021 stablecoins facilitated $1 trillion in transaction volume - more than the previous four quarters combined.

A thread on the incredible quarter below.

👇🏾
In Q1 2021 the stablecoin monetary base reached over $65 billion and continues to rise at an accelerating pace.
Stablecoins continue to be adopted for a number of reasons:

✅ easy to accept as payments given all you need is a public blockchain address

✅ run on global public infrastructure that operates 24/7/365 which makes them incredibly available and reliable

niccarter.info/wp-content/upl…
Read 6 tweets
22 Apr
DEX volumes reached over $217 billion in Q1 2021.

This is up 236% from Q4 2020, and a whopping 8,012% from Q1 2020.

Uniswap continued to lead the way as volumes continue to rise in lockstep with asset prices.

A recap of the quarter below.

👇🏾
On a monthly basis DEX volumes reached a peak of $84 billion in February, once again led by Uniswap.
The biggest winner this quarter, and one of the more controversial DEXs, was PancakeSwap.

As BSC boomed in Q1, PancakeSwap grew its market share from to 37%.

The majority of the growth came from the middle of February onwards as Ethereum’s DeFi ecosystem fizzled out.
Read 8 tweets
12 Apr
Price action will cause people to believe anything.

I don’t care how high BNB or CAKE go, it won’t change that they’re still copycats.

It’s one thing to view these assets as a way to make money, it’s another to view them as innovations that push this industry forward.

1/
The reason why BSC is faster and more scalable is not because of some magical technological innovation.

No, it’s instead the magic of centralization.

BSC is an Ethereum fork with a centralized validator set.

That’s it. Nothing more.
What Binance has done well with BSC is GTM.

Binance has incredible reach and influence and has used that to funnel a boatload of new users in DeFi.

Binance executes period. That’s why BSC is winning.
Read 8 tweets
11 Apr
“xyz protocol is great, but I don’t get how value accrues to xyz token”

This take sounds smart on the surface, but has now psyops many people out of the best opportunities.

Just because a token doesn’t capture fees now, doesn’t mean it won’t eventually capture value.

1/
As this view has become more popular it’s gradually begun to get abused.

Tokeneconomics are important, especially after the wave of useless utility tokens in 2017.
But that doesn’t mean that every token needs pay dividends now to be valuable.

What’s far more important is:

1) protocols are used and create value first

2) protocols have a viable path to value capture

messari.io/article/govern…
Read 4 tweets
6 Apr
Application specific blockchains are going to surprise people over the coming months.

Many have much better value capture and clearer paths to adoption than all the general purpose smart contracting platforms which have poor value capture and face an uphill battle vs Ethereum.
@terra_money and @THORChain are early examples of this.

Expect these two to continue gaining attention over the coming months, and expect more like them to emerge.

The smart contracting market is saturated, and there’s a ton of value being created at the base layer elsewhere.
In the future I imagine many smart contract platforms may specialize and become defacto application specific chains.

Others will ultimately function like branch offices for protocols that are headquartered on Ethereum.
Read 5 tweets
6 Apr
With the launch of @feiprotocol you’ve probably been hearing a lot about Protocol Controlled Value (PCV).

PCV is a powerful concept that’s core to of many of the latest decentralized stablecoins including $FEI, $OHM, $FLOAT, and $FRAX.

But what is it and why does it matter?

1/
PCV is a fairly simple idea.

It basically just means a protocol itself taking ownership of the collateral it receives when users mint new stablecoins.

This means collateral is not redeemable like it is in MakerDAO.
FEI Genesis participants just found this out the hard way.

The ETH they deposited into Fei's bonding curve is not redeemable.

They can only get their ETH back by selling FEI to the protocol on the protocol's terms (currently at a massive discount).

Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(