1/5
A moderate increase in China's CPI inflation would in some ways be a good sign because it would suggest that consumption was rising faster than production, which might in turn imply a rebalancing of income towards middle-class households and workers.

scmp.com/economy/china-…
2/5
But it would leave the PBoC with a difficult policy choice. If the PBoC were to prevent interest rates from rising in line with the increase in inflation, it would in effect be engineering an income transfer from ordinary households (by reducing the value of their...
3/5
savings) to banks or to borrowers, i.e. businesses and government entities. This would not only reverse the rebalancing process, but by lowering the real cost of borrowing it would encourage more rising debt, asset-price bubbles, and the further misallocation of investment.
4/5
But if the PBoC raised interest rates in line with the increase in inflation, this would shorten the duration of existing debt and increase repayment pressures for China's most-heavily-indebted businesses and provincial governments – along, probably, with defaults.
5/5
Of course the more leveraged the economy, the more destabilizing an increase in nominal interest rates becomes.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Pettis

Michael Pettis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelxpettis

14 May
1/10
This is the argument that Yu Yongding and a few others have been making, but I don't think that this is what most economic policymakers and policy advisors believe. In a recent debate Yu described his view as a minority view.
2/10
As for “Consumption is never a source of growth", I think the claim can be made that it isn't a direct source of growth, and certainly not in the way Beijing has always thought about growth, but it is consumption (foreign or domestic) that justifies business...
3/10
investment, even if one can pretend that more consumption isn't needed to justify property and infrastructure investment, and in China it is the latter two that is largely unproductive and causes the surge in debt.
Read 10 tweets
12 May
1/4
“If the goal was to reduce imports from China then it succeeded,” said Craig Allen, president of the U.S.-China Business Council, which represents U.S. companies do business in China. “But if the goal was...
wsj.com/articles/u-s-t…
2/4
to increase manufacturing employment in the United States I don’t see any evidence that that’s happened. If the goal was to increase imports from other countries in Asia or increase manufacturing employment in Vietnam, it’s succeeded.”

carnegieendowment.org/chinafinancial…
3/4
This was always inevitable. In a globalized world in which transportation costs are low and the cost of capital transfers nearly zero, US tariffs on specific Chinese goods can at best shift trade imbalances around. Their impact on the overall US trade deficit or the...
Read 4 tweets
12 May
1/4
According to this WSJ article: "Large card issuers...say that overall card balances—and thus the firms’ interest income—are falling. To make up for it, issuers are spending more on marketing and loosening their underwriting standards."

wsj.com/articles/credi…
2/4
This reinforces one of the points that@M_C_Klein and I make in our book. Contrary to popular opinion — even among economists who really should know better — a country's savings rate isn't determined by that country's moral values, or its cultural...

yalebooks.yale.edu/book/978030024…
3/4
attitudes towards thrift, but depends rather on structural reasons, among the most important of which are bank lending standards. Because in every country there is a wide range among households of attitudes towards risk and thrift, the amount of consumer credit depends...
Read 4 tweets
12 May
1/5
Jiangsu province, the largest local government bond issuer, has issued rules restricting new debt issuance by local government financing vehicles: "For highly leveraged LGFVs with poor performance, debt increases must be approved by ...

caixinglobal.com/2021-05-12/jia…
2/5
investors, according to guidance issued earlier this month by the provincial government. LGFVs with good financial results and low debt ratios can still increase operational debt by a certain amount."
3/5
What does this mean? Only one or some combination of three things: the locus of future borrowing will shift from insolvent LGFVs to healthy ones, until they too are unable to meet the new criteria; local governments will discover or invent new ways (often hidden) of...
Read 5 tweets
12 May
1/5
Good interview. I agree with Leland Miller (@ChinaBeigeBook) that in China a rapid, chaotic debt adjustment – i.e. a financial crisis – is, and has always been, extremely unlikely. Just look at the Huarong debacle. While the risk of crisis will rise as foreign capital...
2/5
becomes an increasingly important part of the Chinese financial system, for now it isn't. As long as the regulators can maintain control of the country's liabilities, and can restructure them at will to prevent a balance-sheet breakdown, there is unlikely to be a crisis.
3/5
This doesn't mean debt isn't a problem. Once debt can no longer rise, there'll be an adjustment in which the overvalued assets that back the debt are effectively amortized, and this adjustment must have an adverse impact both on reported wealth (what John Kenneth Galbraith...
Read 5 tweets
11 May
1/5
This article suggests that because the Chinese credit markets have largely calmed down since Huarong's credit problems first emerged six weeks ago, this might encourage the regulators not to bail out Huarong, in which case Huarong will have to...

bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
2/5
restructure its debts and impose haircuts — perhaps even substantial ones — onto their creditors.

It would be a good thing if this were true because it would help undermine the moral hazard that underpins lending in China, but there are at least two reasons I'm skeptical.
3/5
First, given how complicated and messy a Huarong restructuring would be, it was almost certainly the emergence of a consensus that regulators would in fact bail out creditors that explains why the markets calmed down. Undermining that consensus would also undermine the calm.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(