The emphasis on personal responsibility is one that other big oil and gas companies have used as well. Exxon, BP and Shell are 3 of the 20 companies responsible for 1/3 of global carbon emissions since 1965. (source: Heede, theguardian.com/environment/20…) ...
Here "three experts point to the history of the carbon footprint, a tool that tells you how much pollution you are creating. The fossil fuel industry, particularly BP, pushed this concept onto the masses in a hugely successful marketing effort 20 yrs ago." discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/h…
Just a few months ago, @Shell paid to have this tweet emphasizing personal responsibility promoted into my timeline. I replied.
What does this accomplish? It overwhelms individuals with guilt. I hear from people all the time about guilt. And guilt paralyzes us. As @MaryHeglar says in one of my all-time fav essays, vox.com/the-highlight/…
And it's not like it even works. As @leahstokes says in @allwecansave, "we ran this experiment [of not driving and not flying and not leaving our homes] in 2020 and emissions fell 7%". That's just a fraction of what needs to happen to meet our Paris goals.
So what's the answer? As @billmckibben says,
Changing social norms is the way society changes. And we've done it before. Not b/c a Prez or PM or CEO decided to end slavery, allow women to vote, or desegregate. Change happens when individual people decide it must. That's what my new book is all about: simonandschuster.com/books/Saving-U…
And that's why talking about climate change is such an important first step - because how else are we to know why it matters, and what we can do to fix it? Talking about it knocks over the very first domino in the chain of social change. ted.com/talks/katharin…
But when we're obsessing over the size of our own sins, and waving judgmental fingers at others who don't adhere to our personal Ten Commandments of Green Living, who wins? Not you, and not me. Go right back to the top of this thread: that's who wins. sciencemag.org/news/2016/08/j…
If you are looking for more reading/listening on this topic. I highly recommend the following three resources: First, this episode of @degreespod with @DrKWilkinson, @leahstokes, @billmckibben and @Shahzeen degreespod.com/episodes/episo…
And third, this evergreen essay from fellow climate scientist @MichaelEMann time.com/5669071/lifest…
Lest any assume, wrongly, that scientists use this as a free get-out-of-personal-action card, read & listen to the above and abcnews.go.com/Technology/wir…

But we've done the math and we know personal action just isn't enough: it's the system that has to change. The good news? It can.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Prof. Katharine Hayhoe

Prof. Katharine Hayhoe Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KHayhoe

20 Apr
Love that we are talking about the importance of communication in science in our #vEGU21 session! I summarized my best advice to fellow scientists at a @Lamont_Doherty talk this past year, watch here:
In a nutshell:

1. Set a limit on your time, or you can be overwhelmed.
2. Focus on what YOU are good at! Writing like @KA_Nicholas? Vids like @ClimateAdam? Ice hockey, like Gabe Vecchi? princeton.edu/news/2021/03/2…
3. Don't be distracted by the seven-percenters.
Read 6 tweets
9 Apr
One quarter of the tweets on the US withdrawal from Paris Agreement were generated by bots and the majority promoted climate denial. This fits with my own experience: about 25-30% of those I have to block score v high on bot detectors (but over 70% don't!) tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
A similar pattern was observed with misinformation that was deliberately manufactured and disseminated regarding the devastating Australian bushfires last year. Lies included the claim that climate activists started the fires to ... prove climate change?! theconversation.com/bushfires-bots…
We humans are suckers for false info that confirms our preexisting biases. That's why fake news on Twitter travels 6x faster than truth. In other words, on avg, the tweets by troll with 10k followers will reach further than those of a scientist with 60k. apnews.com/article/8da97e…
Read 7 tweets
24 Mar
Horrified to learn today that in the 5 years since the Paris Agreement, the world’s 60 biggest banks have financed fossil fuels to the tune of $3.8T. Top of the list is @Chase, which provides both @amazon & @united's reward cards. So what did I do? (next) ran.org/bankingonclima…
First, I cancelled my card as personal action is impt! But it's not sufficient. So next, I emailed customer serv explaining why. Then, I reached out to their sustainability team, **expressed my appreciation for what they'd already done** & asked if they'd consider a new provider.
And lastly, of course, I posted here too! Why? Because I hope you'll join me! The more voices we have encouraging companies to do the right thing, the better. It's all of our shared future that's at stake. There is no planet B.
Read 6 tweets
25 Feb
A small sample from email inbox of a climate scientist.
These and nearly 200 other "zombie" arguments are fully addressed, with citations to all the original scientific studies, by this excellent list: skepticalscience.com/argument.php
I also have more than 30 short episodes here that address common questions from "isn't it just a natural cycle?" to "how is climate change affecting me where I live?" and "is it too late to fix it?" globalweirdingseries.com
Read 7 tweets
19 Feb
Many Texans are in dire straights. Some have not had power or water for days. As always, it's those below the poverty line who are suffering most. If you'd like to help, please donate to one of the organizations in this list. rollingstone.com/culture/cultur…
The stories are heart-breaking. wsj.com/articles/in-fr…
And the politics is undeniable. earther.gizmodo.com/how-much-the-o…
Read 5 tweets
12 Feb
Overshadowed by coronavirus, 2020 set a new annual record of 22 billion-dollar weather and climate events in the U.S. - shattering the previous annual record of 16 events that occurred in 2011 and 2017. Source: ncdc.noaa.gov/billions/
As this Global Weirding episode explains, the question isn't "did climate change cause this event?" Rather, scientists ask "how much worse did climate change make it?" And increasingly, the answer is: "a lot."
Putting a number on how much stronger, more damaging, bigger or more frequent climate change made an event is something climate scientists call "attribution." It's at the cutting edge of our research today, and this fantastic book by @FrediOtto explains: greystonebooks.com/products/angry…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(