@charlescwcooke’s brilliant piece on Rebekah Jones, supposedly a COVID whistleblower in Florida, exposed her as a fraud & a charlatan.
You may be wondering how the grift went on for so long. My hunch: unscrupulous media attention.
I thought it was time to revisit.⤵️
First, quick background.
@GeoRebekah earned media fame after she was fired for, purportedly, refusing to “fudge” the #’s on COVID deaths/cases in FL. But as Cooke explains none of her story was (or even could be) true. She never had access to data at all: google.com/amp/s/www.nati…
But that of course didn’t stop mainstream outlets from rushing to report how big, bad Governor DeSantis had punished this poor whistleblower supposedly trying to do her job.
That’s, at least, how anyone would read the coverage from @CNN.
Any follow up from those legal experts?
In particular, @ChrisCuomo/@CuomoPrimeTime provided ample opportunities for @GeoRebekah to push unfounded conspiracy theories without even a hint of credulity, forget pushback.
Will we get an apology for this sloppy reporting, now that we know Jones was lying?
Jones was a frequent guest on @MSNBC, too. They ran a similar play as CNN: let Jones tell her tall tale without even pretending to determine it’s truthfulness.
That no one in her old office has (or can!) confirm her story or that a Dem judge upheld charges against her be damned.
And it wouldn’t be a lefty conspiracy theory if it weren’t endorsed full-throatedly by @JoyAnnReid, who was all too happy to talk to @GeoRebekah.
Perhaps it isn’t @RonDeSantisFL’s honesty we should be concerned about?
I want to pause here to drive the point home: no one in any official capacity supported Jones’ story. There was one random lawyer who resigned in protest and it made big news. But everyone - everyone - involved disputed Jones’ contentions & findings, as Cooke’s piece makes clear.
It boggles the mind, then, that these outlets would’ve run with this narrative - absent any evidence beyond what one unknown person had said *about herself!* - to create this narrative that just so happened to undermine a potential 2024 GOP candidate the press doesn’t like.
And yet, across outlet after outlet in the mainstream media, we saw this same framing.
Here’s @USATODAY, again, relying on a story that (if it were true) would be a huge deal, told by a well-known fabulist, with zero interrogation of the story’s veracity that has since imploded.
(A quick perusal of Jones’ personal history should give us A LOT of reason to doubt her truthfulness, including a hundreds of pages long manifesto after she was fired for having sex with a student as a professor. Jones was married with kids at the time: google.com/amp/s/www.foxn…)
Anyway, Cooke points out that this lack of a real story is why there wasn’t some big @nytimes scoop on FL undercounting COVID deaths, as Jones alleges.
He’s right, but the Times did report on Jones...just as a brave underling daring to take on Governor DeSantis.
Is it any wonder that people believed Jones when outlets like @NBCNews covered her story as if she was both the victim and the hero?
Mind you, this whole saga was yet another invention. Cops sat patiently at her door for over 20 minutes asking her to come outside. She wouldn’t.
Among the worst had to be @Cosmopolitan, who did a full exclusive sit down with her, where she repeated all of the same lies, spun into a truly ridiculous narrative.
I wish I was kidding, but this isn’t even the worst of it.
@Forbes made her their Tech Person of the Year in 2020. They even excused the charges against her!
@FortuneMagazine named her to their 40 under 40 list in healthcare, a subject matter she doesn’t have any knowledge of.
The central claim of this first @washingtonpost piece is simply wrong. All Jones did was run a website. She wasn’t the one creating or altering the data.
And this entire story is built only on *Jones’ telling of events* and ignores *everything the state said to the contrary*
@NPR had Jones on, too. And here it was the same thing: no pushback, no interrogation of the details, no simple investigation of whether her story was even possible (it wasn’t), just puff.
There are too many more examples to list them all here. This perspective was genuinely everywhere.
And of course, it wasn’t just the media. Jones has built a sizable following on Twitter (but blocked me). And there were plenty of individual actors who pushed her grift as well.
Here’s @amandacarpenter, author of a book called “Gaslighting America,” helping Jones do just that.
We even had members of Congress get in on this one.
@RepTedDeutch, any follow up on this conspiracy theory you helped give voice to?
Or from you, @nikkifried? Not sure this’ll help your shot at Governor, in retrospect.
@Laurie_Garrett got this one all entirely wrong. Jones wasn’t an epidemiologist - nor did she have any health care background, she just ran the website - and her claims were entirely divorced from reality.
Maybe the most committed to this conspiracy theory was twitter’s most unscrupulous doctor, @DrEricDing.
Here’s just a smattering:
And of course, the usual unserious blue check brigade was all over this one. I don’t have the mental energy to include all of them, but here’s:
As Cooke says, this is a classic case of a known fraud knowing her mark better than the mark knows himself.
While this may be an excuse for everyday people, that so many who are tasked with bringing us the truth fell for it is a damning indictment of media wishcasting.
I’ve talked lots about the ridiculous coverage of @RonDeSantisFL.
The treatment of Jones is an outcropping of the same impulse: a need for the facts to fit one’s politics, not the other way round.
This time, it was all lies. And left wing conspiracy theories should matter, too.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The day after my 30th birthday I was diagnosed with an inoperable brain tumor.
Two years later, I’m in remission. I don’t talk much about what happened, but I wanted to write it down, both for myself, and in case it could help others.
If interested, follow along. ⤵️
This is admittedly uncomfortable for me. I’m trying to learn how to talk about the experience, because it’s obviously become a big part of my life.
If you aren’t interested in the details, I totally understand. But I want to get this story in one place.
In early 2022, I started getting headaches and dizzy spells. I thought they were just part of getting older.
But one morning I woke up and couldn’t get out of bed. My head was splitting. I started to get dizzy pretty often.
I’m sure you’ve all seen the protests and attendant anti-Semitism at many elite American universities. What you may not be aware of is the hypocrisy in how schools have handled them.
Do you remember what these places said about protests in 2020? I’ve got receipts. ⤵️
We’ve gotta start with @Columbia, given their central role in this drama.
In 2020, the university pledged to change how campus police operated, and said protests were part of a “heightened state of consciousness” on race & were driving the “revitalization of American democracy.”
That, unsurprisingly, led @Columbia to embrace defunding the police on their website, citing a professor.
It’s hard to square that sentiment with calling in police in riot gear to rough up students on campus, @Columbia.
Want to see a media conspiracy, based on Biden admin propaganda to smear a GOP governor, come into existence?
If so, follow along. Let’s revisit the media claim that Texas “physically barred” drowning migrants from entering the country.
Another long one ⤵️
Back in mid-January, three people trying to enter the country illegally drowned in the Rio Grande. It happened while Texas & the Biden admin were fighting about security measures.
The Biden admin told the press a lie. The media ran with it, and most never corrected the stories.
The fraudulent story was advanced first by @CBSNews. On January 14, they claimed that the crossers had drowned b/c Texas “physically barred” rescuers trying to help.
The takeaway from CBS was clear: Texas had deliberately killed people, rather than allowing them to be rescued.
Do you remember how bad the media’s “Covid lab leak” - the hypothesis that the virus came from a lab - coverage was?
I thought I did. But it was a more dramatic example of uniform media malpractice than even I remembered.
So I revisited it. Buckle in, it’s long. ⤵️
It started in Feb 2020 when @SenTomCotton suggested looking into the CCP lab studying bats near the initial cases in Wuhan.
The media were outraged. In a since-updated piece, @washingtonpost said the idea was a “conspiracy theory that has been repeatedly debunked by experts.”
It wasn’t just WaPo. Shortly thereafter, @nytimes trotted out a similar allegation, calling the lab leak hypothesis a “fringe theory” and a “tale” designed to inflame social media.
@CNN’s @ChrisCillizza said Cotton was “playing a dangerous game” with his suggestions.
The reason I take screenshots is that I'm always paranoid that an outlet or journalist will scrap the evidence of a bad take. Maybe I should be giving folks more credit for standing by their inaccuracies.
Every so often I check back in on this, perhaps my all-time favorite headline from @NPR, only to see that it still exists in its original form, from April 2020.
I launched a newsletter, called Holden Court, about the media, what they get wrong & why it matters. The goal is to reach beyond what my 🧵s have on Twitter & to build a better recent history of media & media criticism.
You can sign up at the link in my bio. More ⤵️
At that link you can read my launch piece and get a better idea of what it is that I’m trying to do.
The piece also walks through a recent example of bad media coverage that I worry we’re already forgetting about: the start of Covid.
My general premise for the newsletter is that media criticism could be a lot better; more driven by what the media actually does and says and more set in recent context, rather than an impressionistic sense that the media is hopelessly off-track.