Cases have been coming down in the UK since early January, but last week we bottomed out and this week we have seen small week on week increases (green) in cases, leading to a rise in the 7-day average (black).
1/10
Looking at the 4 nations of the UK, cases have fallen since last week in Northern Ireland, England (slightly) and Wales (marginally), but risen in Scotland.
Wales is down to last September levels, but other nations have a little way to go.
2/10
When we see a rise in cases it makes sense to check positivity (cases detected/tests).
Just looking at PCR test positivity, it seems to be flat across all nations.
Other good news is that positivity rates are low (well below 2% for all nations).
3/10
At a regional level in England cases (per 100K per week) are low and are flat in most regions but have increased slightly in East Midlands, North West, and North East.
4/10
Again, its good to check these raw numbers with PCR positivity rates.
Regional rates are all below 2%.
Six regions saw reductions although there were very small rises in the North West, North East and East Midlands.
5/10
Drilling even deeper,123 (39%) of English local authorities (LAs) this week (orange dots) had an increase in cases compared to the prior week (grey dots) and 213 (68%) LAs had rates higher than Sep 1 (green).
6/10
Its a similar picture with positivity in English LAs. 117 LAs (37%) saw rate increases week on week, albeit almost all were very small.
Only 68 LAs (23%) still had higher rates than Sep 1 (green).
7/10
Bolton, Blackburn with Darwen (North West) and Erewash (East Midlands) saw the largest increases in cases.
The first two have also seen well-publicised increases in cases of the variant of concern (first sequenced in India) B.1.617.2.
8/10
All Scottish LAs were below 4%, with 10 out of 32 LAs showing small increases.
All Welsh LAs were well below 4%, with 8 out of 22 showing small increases.
All NI LAs were below 5%, with 3 out of 11 showing very small increases.
9/10
Overall, just looking at testing data, it is a fairly positive picture.
Looks like we are passing roadmap Test 3: "Infection rates do not risk a surge in hospitalisations which would put unsustainable pressure on the NHS.",
but that we are near the bottom of infection.
\ENDS
With thanks, as ever to Bob Hawkins for his help preparing the data.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today the Royal Society will meet to discuss “Fellows’ behaviour”. Without doubt the fellow they will primarily be discussing is Elon Musk.
The behaviour may range from his public dissemination of unfounded conspiracy theories to his attacks on the science
🧵
1/38
Musk is also an important figure (some would argue the most important) within a US administration that is laying siege to science and to scientific inquiry itself.
2/38 researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-world-…
The new administration’s executive orders have restricted research, silenced climate scientists and cut funding, as part of a systematic targeting of the scientific community.
3/38
Here's what I think we should be doing to ensure that the UK (and indeed other non-US countries) does not suffer the same fate.
🧵
1/37
The United States is currently witnessing an unprecedented assault on its scientists and scientific institutions, driven by populist agendas that prioritise ideology over evidence.
These orchestrated attacks threaten the foundations...
Silence will not shield scientists from the consequences of an increasingly hostile political landscape.
UK and other non-US scientists must act to support our US colleagues.
Here's what I think we should be doing...
🧵
1/35
Science thrives on collaboration and openness.
The people who practice science are committed to seeking truth and combatting falsehoods.
2/35
In an era where political forces increasingly seek to distort, suppress, or co-opt scientific knowledge for ideological purposes, the global scientific community must recognise that staying silent in the face of these challenges is no longer an option.
Fiona Fox’s recent article in Research Professional News cautions that expelling Elon Musk from the Royal Society could undermine public trust in science.
I disagree...
🧵
1/25 researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-uk-vie…
I think that this perspective overlooks the critical role that scientific institutions play in upholding ethical standards and defending the integrity of science, especially at times when science and scientists are subject to threats and intimidation from political institutions
2
It's imperative that scientists and their representative bodies actively engage in political discourse to protect scientific integrity, particularly when it is under direct threat, as has been clearly evidenced by recent developments in the United States
3 iflscience.com/us-science-is-…
After hearing some underwhelming testimony last month at the #COVIDInquiry on the use of respirators, @trishgreenhalgh and I decided to write a rapid response to the @bmj_latest to set the record straight.
Here's what we wrote...
1/15 bmj.com/content/386/bm…
"Respirators outperform surgical masks; fit-testing is desirable but not essential"
Professor Susan Hopkins (UK Covid Inquiry, 18th September 2024) claimed that evidence for the superiority of respirators (which are made to an industry standard and designed to fit ...
2/15
closely around the face) over medical facemasks (which are not generally made to any quality standard and often fit loosely, leaving gaps around the sides) is “weak”.
She also claimed that respirators are of little use if they are not fit-tested.
3/15 bmj.com/content/386/bm…
As the UK’s general election campaign enters its final few weeks, we’ve already seen numerous examples of dodgy declarations, substandard stats and graph gaffs.
So I thought I'd write about the importance of numeracy to the functioning of democracy.
🧵
We can expect to see more questionable claims in the run up to polling day.
The factor that all these all these missteps have in common is that they involve the manipulation or misrepresentation of numerical quantities.
One of the most hotly disputed figures of the campaign so far has been the Conservatives’ claim that Labour’s policies will, as Rishi Sunak put it, “amount to a £2,000 tax rise for everyone”. Labour have rebuffed this figure, arguing that... theguardian.com/politics/artic…