For context:
This is not the first time Nicholas Wade said nonsense outside his field of expertise to suit his preferred ideologically-motivated narrative, despite experts correcting him.
This statement of his is asinine:
"But that seemed not to matter when so much further evidence in support of natural emergence was expected shortly" thebulletin.org/2021/05/the-or…
Wade needs a lesson on how long work in this subject takes.
Could list many other fabrications / misleading claims in Wade's article. But evidence won't persuade most of those attracted to 'lab leak' conspiracy theories.
It's like baseless paranoia about HIV's origins all over again😑
"of 510 researchers who had published on SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19, 38% acknowledged harassment ranging from personal insults to threats of violence" journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jv…
Ridley shows how one can get away with being wrong on topic after topic, as long one states the paranoid ideological narrative many conspiracy theorists want to hear.
@curryja Koonin repeats the same misinformation as Pielke Jr.
The National Academies' report and the DOE report cite some of the same studies.
It's just that the former accurately represents them, while the latter distorts them.