For context:
This is not the first time Nicholas Wade said nonsense outside his field of expertise to suit his preferred ideologically-motivated narrative, despite experts correcting him.
This statement of his is asinine:
"But that seemed not to matter when so much further evidence in support of natural emergence was expected shortly" thebulletin.org/2021/05/the-or…
Wade needs a lesson on how long work in this subject takes.
Could list many other fabrications / misleading claims in Wade's article. But evidence won't persuade most of those attracted to 'lab leak' conspiracy theories.
It's like baseless paranoia about HIV's origins all over again😑
@luckytran In which Bhattacharya does the intellectual equivalent of claiming vaccine denialists are being unfairly persecuted because Andrew Wakefield's blog told him so
"What they're doing is focused protection, and you can see the result. The infection rates are going up in Sweden, but the death rates are not." edhub.ama-assn.org/jn-learning/vi…