1 The degen movement has been the source of many activities that have ranged from concerning to consterning.
2 as a subtribe of DeFi it is prone to deliberately provocative coordination such as Gamestop and Dogecoin
3 From the BUILDL perspective it can seem childish and even at times self-destructive, as it can involve malignant market manipulation and questionable "leadership" ethics and regulatory postures.
4 But from the perspective of revolutionary action, it can also be seen as a pure expression of punk rock ethos or what I call "Fuck you, money"
5 Why should we embrace degen? it is:
1) nonviolent (aggressive as hell, but please compare this monetary revolution to the French or American Revolutions killing people with guns or guillotines).
2) consensual (it involves the freedom to act stupid and potentially get rekt)
6 Why do people degen? First of all, it's fun AF. It's liberating to feel that money can be used in a way other than to feel crushed by an oppressive job or lack of one.
7 So the degen tribe overlaps with the gaming tribe, and the punk rock tribe, the apes and it has the same zen aspect as does punk rock which is an aggressive way of telling people to wake the fuck up.
8 As such there is an overlap with the "Everything is a simulation" tribe as well as "Everything is a game" tribe. But the debate about Elon is whether he is pure greed and manipulation or if he is a fellow gamer.
10 Degens and Regens are now in the same boat. Infinite gamers and abundance is big enough to absorb finite gamers and scarcity.
11 because who gives AF about buying a car with bitcoin or what Elon thinks about anything other than cars and space ships?
12 some people want to decide who belongs to "us" and who doesn't. Meanwhile developers continue to BUILDL as pointed out by @BlockGeekDima and nodes continue to form consensus block after block.
13 Against the backdrop of history, there is room in this tent for everyone. All human endeavor looks kind of adorable at this scale, even the naughty ones.
@AxieInfinity@Ronin_Network 2 Sadly, this is a very large amount of ETH. So doing a reversal on Ronin and creating "Ronin Classic" as was done during the DAO hack is not an option.
3 This was about bridging validators, so the attack was in that respect similar to the Wormhole hack. Again, Vitalik warned us. All chains experience all other chains as off-chain.
1 If you are launching a token take note: Silicon Valley standard for vesting is 1 year cliff 4 year vesting. A thread 🧵 aka rant.
2 According to superfoundersbook.com it takes some years to build a unicorn or larger company/project. Chart below.
3 When I see your short vesting, I need to understand then why you think you will be faster than the average. But more importantly, why take on the retention risk?
Investing in individual game titles or studios is very very very difficult. Investing in governance over the player base means you don't have to pick the one hit game to have a winning investment.
This exact theory is why @GumiCryptos led an early round into @opensea because we feel they will be a horizontal winner with a huge addressable market
1 Ok we are in this part of the cycle again: Bitcoin's problems run deeper than its volatility pitchbook.com/news/articles/…
2 The article opens by saying HODL stands for "Hold On For Dear Life" so immediately screaming "I don't know what the hell I'm talking about and haven't studied it very much but I'm happy to pile on"
3 The headline says that volatility is a "problem" Bitcoin gets attention by alternating between being a rocketship and a monster. The volatility is a feature not a "problem"