Scientists on committee that encouraged use of fear to control people’s behaviour during the Covid pandemic have admitted its work was “unethical” & “totalitarian”
Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour (SPI-B) expressed regret about tactics
Gavin Morgan, a psychologist on the team, said: “Clearly, using fear as a means of control is not ethical. Using fear smacks of totalitarianism. It’s not an ethical stance for any modern government. By nature I am an optimistic person, but all this has given me a more pessimistic
view of people.”
Mr Morgan spoke to author @BareReality who has spent a year investigating the Government’s tactics for her book A State of Fear, published on Monday.
@SteveBakerHW the deputy chairman of the Covid Recovery Group of Tory MPs, said: “If it is true that the state took the decision to terrify the public to get compliance with rules, that raises extremely serious questions about the type of society we want to become.
These are shocking admissions - & more can be found in the just released book by @BareReality "State of Fear" from which these quotes & this story was taken...
How about we simply have the public treated as grown up citizens, where the truth is honestly presented transparently?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Out of 700 businesses surveyed by the Night Time Industries Association which represents businesses like nightclubs, bars & festivals, 70% felt that vaccine certificates, negative testing or immunity proof were not necessary to reopen #NoVaccinePassports
And 69% felt they would have a negative impact on business.
NTIA chief executive Michael Kill said there were still "deep concerns“
"The positive news from the roadmap has been overshadowed by the potential impact of Covid status certificates being implemented by the government“
If he cannot acknowledge his flagship scheme, leaving such an indefensible gulf between what he published & what he said he may already be in some political trouble
A take down & why @FraserNelson should be asking the questions 👇
Too many fences? His own review lays out precisely that proposal Khan mentioned — using immunity status to dictate the freedoms to which citizens are entitled. ‘When we have proposals, we will be setting them out.’