1. I pastor in the small community of Troy Idaho. 15 minutes away from me there is a pastor named Doug Wilson who calls empathy a "sin" and thinks courage means putting women in their place. His Christian nationalism and toxic patriarchy has left numerous victims in his wake.
2. What is the fruit of his kind of preaching and theology? I have heard the stories from multiple people in the community. It's rotten fruit, that defends the perpetrators and hurts the vulnerable. Wilson is a wolf in sheep's clothing.
3. Unfortunately Wilson has a massive following and his brand of toxic patriarchy and Christian nationalism reaches "itching ears." It's the gospel of power and it is destructive.
4. I am fed up with abusive men leading in churches. These are not pastors they are predators. So I had a conversation with my friend Sarah who went to his church and school and who works with victims abused in his system. Enough is enough.
5. "Patriarchy walks hand in hand with racism, and it always has. The same biblical passages used to declare Black people unequal are used to declare women unfit for leadership. Patriarchy and racism are “interlocking structures of oppression.” Isn’t it time we get rid of both?"
6. @bethallisonbarr continues
"The conservative church model of authoritarian leadership combined with rigid gender roles fosters a culture of abuse (decade after decade, church after church, leader after leader)."
Does this model hurt everyone? Of course not but....
7. "It just hurt the thirty or more women who made allegations against Bill Gothard.
It just hurt the victims who filed a class-action suit against Sovereign Grace Ministries for creating an environment in which, they alleged, the sexual abuse of children flourished."
8. just hurt the seven hundred victims of sexual abuse linked to Southern Baptist churches over a period of twenty years."
It has just hurt the countless number of people harmed by Christ Church...
9. Douglas Wilson has championed the toxic patriarchy for decades. He says, "A man penetrates, conquers, colonizes, plants. A woman receives, surrenders, accepts...."
For Wilson, Patriarchy and male dominance is the natural order of things..
10. So when allegations of abuse come it's no surprise that he places the blame on women.
It's no surprise we are in a time of cultural reckoning. This is not the time to sweep it all under the rug. Patriarchy is dead. We have seen it's fruit and it is rotten to the core
1. Does the Bible support slavery? It depends on how you read it. Southern Theologians in the 1800s believed the entire bible supported slavery. They thought any explanation to the contrary was a result of liberalism, atheism, and the creeping compromise of culture.
2. These theologians believed that any minister who said the bible was anti-slavery could not understand the plain truth of the scriptures and were "unfit for the gospel ministry."
But there was a shift during the Second great awakening.
3. Many theologians became convinced that slavery was antithetical to Christianity and the God of love described in the Bible. Reading the Bible through the lens of love these people believed that slavery was categorically wrong and not endorsed by Christ or scripture.
1. Intellectual humility is key. Irrational faith is not a virtue. True humility is foundational to moral character and is a repeated theme in the Bible.
2. A couple of years ago I listened to a conference by the Barna group that talked about the difference between true humility and general humility. General humility is how you see yourself. Intellectual humility is how you see your knowledge.
3. Intellectual humility relates to everyone. True humility means you have an accurate perception of your strengths as well as your weaknesses. This kind of humility has 4 practical behaviors.
The politics in Jesus day was a mess. The Jewish nation was under Roman rule. They were looking for liberation and wondering why God was not sending the Messiah to set them free and restore the temple. To deal with the cognitive dissonance there were 4 political expressions.
2.
A) The Pharisees. They tried to keep the law perfectly so God would restore them to prominence.They viewed Romans as pagans who eventually would be destroyed by God. The Pharisees clung to their identity at the expense of their relevancy. They wanted Judaism to be great again
3.
B) The Saducees. Grasped for relevancy at the expense of their identity. The way they coped with Roman subjugation was compromising with Rome. They exchanged religious conviction for political respect.