One of the biggest problems with cryptoland is that the vast majority of people in it conflate technological know-how with monetary & financial system know-how.

If you don't understand how banking works, that's fine! But for god's sake stop deluding yourself and others about it.
There are a lot of sovereign citizen crazies out there that have convinced themselves that they've discovered the cheat codes to The Law and the Constitution. But of course, they haven't, they're making a dumb person's idea of what a good legal argument sounds like.
The same is true for a significant portion of the crypto community that believes banks lend out reserves, or multiple deposits by 10x via "fractional reserve banking," and can't understand the difference between "100% reserves" and a money market fund-style balance sheet.
You're not edgy, you aren't rendering the law obsolete, you haven't discovered a brilliant hack to the financial system, you're just repeating the same kinds of plays that shadow banks have played for generations & deluded yourself you're different because you added 'tech' to it

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rohan Grey

Rohan Grey Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rohangrey

15 Apr
Some ppl like to criticize MMT for suggesting we can do big spending programs without 1:1 commensurate tax increases. For some, it takes the wind out of args for taxing the rich (it doesnt). Others think it's fantasy to think you can spend big w/o higher middle class taxes.

But
once you get past all of rhetoric and incoherent conflation of nominal and real variables, what this critical view really boils down to is the argument that it's better for progressives to adopt a Manchin-style strategy in budget negotiations.

The MMT position has always been that it's both unnecessary and self-defeating to pick two fights at the same time - one over the spending program, another over the taxes that people want to tie to it.

Our view has been that this two-front strategy usually means loss on both.
Read 4 tweets
9 Apr
Interest rate policy is:

- a blunt tool with lots of negative side effects
- by definition not targeted to the actual source of inflation
- potentially counterproductive due to contradictory effects of income channel vs price channel
- usually considered to exclusion of all else
New Keynesians have for years relied on interest rate adjustments to singlehandedly manage inflation outside of the ZLB/ELB, as Jason's own thread asserted.

What's the point in acknowledging it's shortcomings if you're just going to default back to knee-jerk reliance on it?
It's like someone looking for their keys a mile from where they lost them because that's where the light is, someone points out it's not where they lost them, and they say 'I agree, my search approach has shortcomings but I'm still gonna search here first".

Why? What the hell?!
Read 17 tweets
7 Apr
Watching leftists and people whose ostensible raison d'etre come to the defense of Substack by criticizing Ghost is pretty sad.

By any objective metric, a non-profit that provides a f/oss product capable of being self-hosted, and which funds the development of that product via
paid hosting services, is far more aligned with progressive values re: concentrated economic power and platform censorship than a VC-funded, for-profit company that solicits big names by paying them advances, and giving them employee-like benefits without actually hiring them.
The real question shouldn't be "why are Nathan and others leaving Substack for Ghost", it should be "why the hell didn't you all move to Ghost in the first place, and why aren't you doing it now independent of Nathan et al's reasons for doing so?"
Read 8 tweets
7 Apr
Sorry, what? This is the free speech warrior?

Ghost is open source software capable of being self-hosted by anyone. They offer hosting services for a fee.

That is a long, long cry from intentionally soliciting & paying 'talent' in the way Substack does.

But more importantly,
the idea that the problem is 'terrorists and pedophiles' may be able to publish content, rather than a large commercial platform deliberately amplifying certain prominent voices with its VC money, is the kind of argument spooks and cops use to suppress individual expression.
"The NYT shouldn't solicit and publish Tom Cotton's warmongering lies, i'm going to resign and host my own Wordpress blog instead"

"OMG you know terrorists and pedophiles can get a Raspberry Pi and host a WP site, right? Pre-tty hy-po-cri-ti-cal"

"...What?"
Read 4 tweets
7 Apr
I get that someone like Breyer is positionally almost required to say this kind of stuff, but to pretend like Bush v Gore didnt represent a profound challenge to the long term health of this worldview is frankly dishonest.
Bush v Gore wasn't just a matter of favoriting conservative causes, it showed - similar to the Whitlam dismissal in Oz - that when push comes to shove the fiction of a clean separation between elected and non-elected branches is not enough to sustain/protect democratic values.
"Oh well but notice we didn't take up any election cases this time around" - so what? Is that supposed to make people feel better? Every election cycle, are we expected to just cross our fingers and hope that whatever makeup of the Court at the time resembles 2020 more than 2000?
Read 6 tweets
18 Feb
🚨🚨🚨 ANNOUNCEMENT 🚨🚨🚨

@AyannaPressley Unveils Historic Federal Job Guarantee Resolution.

pressley.house.gov/media/press-re…
The resolution draws on historical Civil Rights leaders like Coretta Scott King & economists like Sadie Alexander, & is supported by a wide coalition including @policylink, @NatlJobsForAll, @thepublicmoney, @SEIU, @sunrisemvmt, @CPDAction, @ACREcampaigns, @ourmoneyus, @NelpNews
@AyannaPressley: “It’s time to establish a legal right to a job for all people in America. For years, we have legislated hate, harm & injustice ... It’s long past time to pursue bold, intentional policies that affirm equity & recognize the dignity & humanity of all people.”
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(