Listening to Charlie Sykes and Bill Kristol because I was honestly curious what 'woke' Kristol thinks about Israel/Palestine today. Obviously I didn't expect him to have gone Squad-style pro-Palestinian.
And nope He said he was glad Biden was taking the line he is taking and would have been very upset about his Biden vote, retrospectively, if Biden had done anything else. I strained my ears for a hint of what he thinks the 'right answer' would be at this point.
I think he thinks the solution is for the surrounding Arab countries to have taken in the Palestinians decades ago. So, anyway, Israel is not to be blamed for the structural insanity of the situation and just keep on keeping on.
I guess it says something that neocons - inventive lot! - just don't have much to say about the situation. Just some rhetoric to massage the really awful bits and that's it. That's the plan.
I did find it notable he was eager to emphasize that the US bears no responsibility for this situation. Not Trump's fault, not Biden's fault. That's a 'tell', in a neocon, of just how out of ideas he feels he is here.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Sunday morning "Jugend" thread, first half of 1898. I'll just pick whatever seems nice, or fantasy-related. The vignettes are often quite fun. 1/
That first one looks racist but a 'Wenzel' is a jack. Like on the card. A 'joker' then? I don't get it. 2/
I like the signature T-shaped ornaments, dividing the page. As to that 4th - everyone is against Germany, within and without! I'm not sure what happened in 1898 in particular to trigger this cartoon. 3/
bostonreview.net/race-politics/… This is good. Scholar-activism - CRT folks and others - is going to mean sometimes scholarship takes a backseat to activism. That's not intolerable - not even bad - but it does mean stuff should get pushed pack on, in a scholarly sense. 1/
The 'ideal scholar' is some neutral, suspended mind, just weighing evidence - some Watcher figure on the moon. Sure, but that's not life. Scholarship involves advocacy and advocacy can be one-eyed and insistent, leading it to shade the truth, or sweep stuff under the rug. 2/
That's why you have other scholars. Scholar-activism is part of academic ecology. But it can go bad and get grifty, even. So, for its own good, and everyone else's it should get considerate pushback when it goes awry. All this is very obvious, in principle. 3/
I've been spending Sundays posting old "Jugend" illustrations, often with a 'fantasy' quality, after Böcklin. Tomorrow, tomorrow. Today, a thing I've posted before, James Tissot, "The Challenge". I didn't know much about it. But today I googled one tidbit. 1/
Tissot was a society painter who was rubbished by Ruskin as a slickster fashionista. This hurt and "The Challenge" was his attempt to 'go serious'. This is funny to us because it just looks like, you know, fantasy art. Kinda light fetish-y. (No kink-shaming tho!) 2/
But there was this period, in Britain as well as on the continent - in Germany (although Böcklin was Swiss) - when fantasy seemed 'modernist'. I would like to know more about the moment 'when fantasy was modern', then rejected as unsuitable, in visual art. 3/
Good literary criticism from @lionel_trolling! I proclaim myself the same. I, too, read Trilling on "Mansfield Park" but never the novel. I liked "The Liberal Imagination" so much it confused me into an untenable view of liberalism for years. 1/
It all started in college, loving Orwell's essays - not just the one on "Politics and the English Language" everyone reads. Orwell's novels? - meh. Later, one book that had an outsized influence on my own writing, maybe thinking style, is William Empson's "Argufying". 2/
Check it at the Internet Archive (but you have to check it out.) I'll snippet the opening from the title essay. This caused me to read Donne seriously but also to think about the liminal place of argument in various genres. 3/ archive.org/details/argufy…
Maybe I'll pile on this thread later, with the rest. For starters, I think we can agree Biden don't jive. The word is 'jibe'. But it's one of those words people get wrong. 1/
So I got curious. Whence 'jibe'? The odd thing is that this usage is opposite to other senses, seemingly. 'To jibe' is to sneer; or steer a boat in a way I wouldn't describe as 'harmonizing' with the wind. 2/ google.com/search?client=…
The OED says it's a mystery but the first instance, from 1813 - "it curricle-izes or gibes in but too well with the passing anecdotes of the day" - seems to suggest a clear solution and it isn't the phonetic connection to 'chime'. 3/
New OBZ! Some delicate color here - lest one think Nietzche feels only contempt for these derpy denizens of the town. Do not these spots of color indicate an earnest wish on Z's, hence N's, part that the organ grinder not merely have his organs ground? 1/ onbeyondzarathustra.com/copy-of-gdfd-p…
Speaking of which! There is no 'team' in 'intestinal', but there is an 'I' and a 'test'. We are really getting to "Ye have made your way from worm to man, and much within you is still worm ..." 2/
Look at the little guy's face? Is he not - we? As Alexander Pope writes:
"So morning insects that in muck begun,
Shine, buzz, and fly-blow in the setting sun."