Andreas Fulda 🇺🇦 🇹🇼 Profile picture
May 17, 2021 18 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Have you ever wondered how the Chinese Communist Party's censorship regime works at home and abroad? What follows is a short thread 🧵 /1
The CCP's sharp power works with the help of the *simultaneous* use of carrots and sticks. In my book "The Struggle for Democracy in Mainland China, Taiwan and Hong Kong" I called the carrots rule by bribery and the sticks rule by fear /2
A key instrument is the psychological warfare technique of ‘decomposition’ (Zersetzung) against domestic and international opponents of the regime /3
The CCP's threatening posture leads to imagined and / or realistic fear among members of the target audience. The result is individual and institutional self-censorship. Why is self-censorship so corrosive? /4
People start worrying about upsetting Chinese partner organisations / funders; fear putting colleagues / family / friends in China at risk; and / or fear losing access to China. Such conflict avoidance means that individuals are afraid to ‘live in truth’ (Václav Havel) /5
Another outcome of censorship is enforced silence. Open discourse about China is seen as a dangerous act. Victims of CCP censorship need to justify silence to avoid cognitive dissonance. And those who do not want to be silent are likely to feel guilty (internal dilemma) /6
Yet there are also those who want to continue to collaborate with “official China” regardless of the political limitations. When there are no red lines to such an unconditional engagement, however, we can observe highly problematic coping strategies /7
Coping strategy 1: Wilfully playing down valid empirical evidence in order to appease Chinese authorities /8
Coping strategy 2: An alternative excuse is claim to discuss sensitive issues behind ‘closed doors’ only /9
Coping strategy 3: Fig leaf events to appease one's conscience /10
Ultimately, the political and psychological costs of the CCP's censorship are enormous /11
It leads to the open or tacit support for ‘official China’ (represented by the party-state) and the marginalisation of ‘unofficial China’ (by which I mean Chinese citizens who seek autonomy from the CCP and who no longer accept its rule by fear) /12
Acceptance of the CCP's censorship normalises the Chinese party-state /13
There is subsequently also no empathy and no solidarity with the many victims of CCP rule /14
Acceptance of the CCP's political censorship also leads to a denial of the values of one’s own socialisation process and the lowering of one’s own standards /15
And another impact of not mounting any resistance to political censorship is that one loses the respect of the Chinese Communist Party, which leads to an encouragement for even more aggressive behaviour /16
To a certain extent we are all victims of the CCP's totalitarian rule. But we don't have to accept this predicament. I firmly believe that we can overcome political censorship through solidarity and collective action /17
Did I perhaps overlook some important aspects related to the phenomenon of the CCP's censorship regime? Do you agree or disagree? What can we do beyond standing in solidarity with one another to overcome CCP censorship? Your comments and reflections are most welcome /End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andreas Fulda 🇺🇦 🇹🇼

Andreas Fulda 🇺🇦 🇹🇼 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AMFChina

Dec 14
Five facts you need to know about 'Ilha Formosa' (美麗之島), the stunningly beautiful island-state also known as Taiwan. In this 🧵 I explain why it is in all of our interests that democratic 🇹🇼 is safeguarded against military annexation by 🇨🇳 - now and in the future /1
In the following I will assess Taiwan's turbulent history; offer reflections about sovereignty, trade, identity formation; and address the island-state's geo-economic and geo-strategic importance for the free and democratic world. But first let us rewind a bit /2 Image
People in Taiwan have struggled against outside rule for centuries. The Dutch (1624–1662) had a colony in the south, whilst the Spanish ruled in the north (1626–1642). Uprisings by indigenous people (原住民; Lamey Island massacre) or Han settlers were violently suppressed /3This unofficial map, made by Caspar Schmalkalden, after he left the service of the Dutch East India Company is unusual in the detail it provides for the eastern coast. During the early years of the colony, the eastern coast was largely neglected. In the 1640s, however, the company sent several expeditions to reconnoiter the east coast and investigate rumors of gold mines in the mountains. This map reflects the company's newfound knowledge about the geography of the east coast, including the long valley behind the Coastal Mountain Range (海岸山脈) and the Cavalan area. Used by permission of the ...
Formosa (Taiwan) in the 17th century.   China (Ming)   Dutch Territory   Spanish Territory   "Kingdom of Middag". CC BY-SA 4.0, Uwe Dedering,
Read 18 tweets
Dec 3
Annalena Baerbock oder Robert Habeck? Wer hat es geschafft, Olaf Scholz in der Chinapolitik zu einem realistischeren Kurs zu bewegen? Ein 🧵 mit meiner Bewertung nach drei Jahren Ampel-Koalition /1 Robert Habeck von Bündnis 90/Die Grünen bei einer Wahlkampfveranstaltung in Kiel, © Michael Brandtner, CC-BY-SA-4.0  Event, Konferenz, re:publica: Außenpolitik in gewendeten Zeiten: Außenministerin Annalena Baerbock im Gespräch mit Johnny Haeusler, © Steffen Prößdorf, CC-BY-SA-4.0  Der SPD Politiker, Bürgermeister der Hansestadt Hamburg und Spitzenkandidat seiner Partei für die Bürgerschaftswahl in Hamburg 2015 Olaf Scholz bei einem Fototermin in Hamburg. © Frank Schwichtenberg, CC-BY-SA-3.0
In ihrem Buch 'Ende der China-Illusion' (Piper, 2023) hat Oertel darauf hingewiesen, dass es in der außenpolitischen Forschung eher unüblich sei, "Haltungsnoten für Entscheidungsträger:innen" zu verteilen. Ich halte das jedoch für notwendig, um politische Führung zu bewerten /2 Image
In den letzten drei Jahren haben sich zwei Grünen-Politiker in der deutschen Chinapolitik besonders verdient gemacht: Habeck und Baerbock. Welche Akzente haben sie jeweils gesetzt? Wem ist es gelungen, die Konturen einer neuen deutschen strategischen Kultur stärker zu prägen? /3 Robert Habeck und Annalena Baerbock auf der Bundesdelegiertenkonferenz (BDK) der Partei Bündnis 90/Die Grünen, 2023 in Karlsruhe, © Martin Kraft, CC-BY-SA-4.0
Read 21 tweets
Nov 30
Röttgen fragt zu Recht, wie eine Bundesregierung so eklatant beim Schutz unserer Demokratie versagen kann. Bei illegaler Einmischung in 🇩🇪 spielen das Ministerium für Staatssicherheit, Chinas Einheitsfront-Bürokratie sowie organisierte Kriminalität eine Rolle. Ein kurzer 🧵 /1 Image
Warum ist die Kommunistische Partei Chinas (KPCh) bereit, deutsche Souveränität zu verletzen? Hier müssen wir uns klar sein, dass Staatssicherheit für die KPCh Regimestabilität bedeutet. Die Parteiführung sieht Gefahren sowohl im In- als auch im Ausland /2 prcleader.org/post/piercing-…
Das Ministerium für Staatssicherheit gehört zu einem Geflecht an Behörden unter Kontrolle der Kommunistischen Partei Chinas, die laut britischen Geheimdiensterkenntnissen damit beauftragt sind, im Ausland die sogenannten "fünf Gifte" zu bekämpfen /3 businessinsider.com/chinas-spy-age…
Read 19 tweets
Nov 23
Merkel stellt sich in ihren politischen Memoiren einen Persilschein aus. Steinmeier ist trotz der krachend gescheiterten Russland-Politik immer noch Bundespräsident. Machen wir uns ehrlich: Unsere unterentwickelte Fehlerkultur gefährdet Europas Sicherheit. Ein etwas längerer 🧵/1 Angela Merkel (CDU), ehemalige Bundeskanzlerin, bekommt von Bundespräsident Frank-Walter Steinmeier das Großkreuz des Verdienstordens der Bundesrepublik Deutschland in besonderer Ausführung im Schloss Bellevue verliehen. Quelle: Michael Kappeler/dpa
Um Missverständnisse gar nicht erst aufkommen zu lassen: es geht mir im Folgenden nicht darum, dass deutsche Spitzenpolitiker für Fehlentscheidungen Abbitte leisten müssen. Merkel und Steinmeier brauchen auch nicht den Gang nach Canossa anzutreten. Es geht um etwas wichtigeres /2 Mathilde von Canossa (um 1046–1115) war eine der mächtigsten Adligen in Italien und herrschte über weite Gebiete der Toskana und der Lobardei © Donizo/ Wikimedia Commons
Helene Bubrowski hat in ihrem jüngsten Buch darauf hingewiesen, dass “Fehlentscheidungen und andere Verfehlungen” in unserem politischen System nicht vorgesehen sind, und das “obwohl sie Teil davon sind”. Daher das ständige “vertuschen, abstreiten, aussitzen” /3 Image
Read 19 tweets
Nov 21
Are we seeing the dawn of Communist Chinese Imperialism? Christopher Ford sees echoes of European imperialism in the Chinese Communist Party's Global South strategy. Join me to find out more /1 newparadigmsforum.com/call-it-by-its…CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 Deed rhk111 Liaoning aircraft carrier 2018
Cover of Dr. Christopher A. Ford's newest publication with the title "Call it by its Name: Communist Chinese Imperialism" (National Institute for Public Policy, 20 November 2024).
First, a few words about the author. Christopher Ford served as U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and Nonproliferation (2018-21). He has also written three books on China. He can be seen as a pracademic, a practicing academic /2 newparadigmsforum.com/aboutImage
I learned about Christopher Ford's excellent scholarship when doing research for my new book 'Germany and China'. I was keen to learn more about China's strategic culture. I found his theoretical and practical insights utterly convincing and compelling /3 nbr.org/publication/be…Image
Image
Read 23 tweets
Nov 20
Scholz will einen "großen Krieg" mit Russland verhindern. Und auf unfaire Handelspraktiken Chinas dürfe die EU nicht so reagieren "dass wir uns selbst schädigen". Jeweils kommt die gleiche de­fä­tis­tische Denk- und Redefigur zu Einsatz: bloß keine Eskalation. Ein kurzer 🧵 /1 Image
Image
Der Raketenangriff nach dem Telefonat mit Putin zeigt: Russland eskaliert, während Scholz und Plötner immer noch glauben, man könne durch gutes Zureden ein radikal-revisionistisches Regime dazu bringen, den völkerrechtswidrigen Angriffskrieg zu beenden /2 theguardian.com/world/2024/nov…
Bei unfairen Handelspraktiken Chinas sieht es nicht besser aus. Anstatt die Automobil-Lobbyisten in Berlin zu ignorieren kuscht @Bundeskanzler Scholz was Schutzzölle auf E-Autos angeht vor Peking. Auch hier lautet das Motto: bloß keine Eskalation /3 wiwo.de/politik/europa…
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(