Have you ever wondered how the Chinese Communist Party's censorship regime works at home and abroad? What follows is a short thread 🧵 /1
The CCP's sharp power works with the help of the *simultaneous* use of carrots and sticks. In my book "The Struggle for Democracy in Mainland China, Taiwan and Hong Kong" I called the carrots rule by bribery and the sticks rule by fear /2
A key instrument is the psychological warfare technique of ‘decomposition’ (Zersetzung) against domestic and international opponents of the regime /3
The CCP's threatening posture leads to imagined and / or realistic fear among members of the target audience. The result is individual and institutional self-censorship. Why is self-censorship so corrosive? /4
People start worrying about upsetting Chinese partner organisations / funders; fear putting colleagues / family / friends in China at risk; and / or fear losing access to China. Such conflict avoidance means that individuals are afraid to ‘live in truth’ (Václav Havel) /5
Another outcome of censorship is enforced silence. Open discourse about China is seen as a dangerous act. Victims of CCP censorship need to justify silence to avoid cognitive dissonance. And those who do not want to be silent are likely to feel guilty (internal dilemma) /6
Yet there are also those who want to continue to collaborate with “official China” regardless of the political limitations. When there are no red lines to such an unconditional engagement, however, we can observe highly problematic coping strategies /7
Coping strategy 1: Wilfully playing down valid empirical evidence in order to appease Chinese authorities /8
Coping strategy 2: An alternative excuse is claim to discuss sensitive issues behind ‘closed doors’ only /9
Ultimately, the political and psychological costs of the CCP's censorship are enormous /11
It leads to the open or tacit support for ‘official China’ (represented by the party-state) and the marginalisation of ‘unofficial China’ (by which I mean Chinese citizens who seek autonomy from the CCP and who no longer accept its rule by fear) /12
Acceptance of the CCP's censorship normalises the Chinese party-state /13
There is subsequently also no empathy and no solidarity with the many victims of CCP rule /14
Acceptance of the CCP's political censorship also leads to a denial of the values of one’s own socialisation process and the lowering of one’s own standards /15
And another impact of not mounting any resistance to political censorship is that one loses the respect of the Chinese Communist Party, which leads to an encouragement for even more aggressive behaviour /16
To a certain extent we are all victims of the CCP's totalitarian rule. But we don't have to accept this predicament. I firmly believe that we can overcome political censorship through solidarity and collective action /17
Did I perhaps overlook some important aspects related to the phenomenon of the CCP's censorship regime? Do you agree or disagree? What can we do beyond standing in solidarity with one another to overcome CCP censorship? Your comments and reflections are most welcome /End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Der jüngste Appell von @JohannesVarwick et al warnt vor "Panikstimmung" im Umgang mit Russland und spielt die Bedrohung durch ein radikal-revisionistisches Russland unter Putin herunter. Eine kurze Gegenrede /1 stern.de/politik/deutsc…
Es handelt sich dabei um eine Ansammlung altbekannter Denk- und Redefiguren, die in der Vision von Deutschland als "Zivilmacht" (Hanns W. Maull) verankert sind /2
Die Unterzeichner fordern "Kompromisse". Doch wie sollen Verhandlungen Putin von kinetischen und hybriden Angriffen auf Europa abhalten? /3
Russia’s illegal war of aggression against Ukraine has upended Europe's security architecture, yet Germany’s moralised, dysfunctional foreign policy discourse traps us in a Groundhog Day loop. Trump II’s alignment with Putin makes it even worse. A short🧵/1
It’s not just cognitive dissonance – it’s a case of what Karl Deutsch called 'pathological learning'. Germany is failing to adapt to new realities. Outdated behaviours or beliefs are being reinforced despite clear evidence of their inadequacy /2
For decades🇩🇪was a ‘civilian power’ (Hanns W. Maull): rejecting militarism, ‘Never again,’ Ostpolitik etc. In 2025, that is not enough to counter mounting threats to our sovereignty and national security /3
Im Herbst 2024 erschienen in der Zeitschrift SIRIUS Rezensionen zu China-Büchern, darunter Oertels neuestes Werk und mein Buch 'Germany and China'. Auffällig war ein Verriss von Susanne Weigelin-Schwiedrziks 'China und die Neuordnung der Welt' (Brandstätter Verlag, 2023) /1
Trotz detaillierter Kenntnisse zu Chinas Außen- und Innenpolitik gelänge es der Autorin nicht ein "differenziertes, kohärentes und realistisches Bild von der derzeitigen internationalen Krisensituation und der Rolle Chinas darin zu vermitteln" /2 degruyter.com/document/doi/1…
Konkret bemängelt der Rezensent Krause, dass Weigelin-Schwiedrzik Chinas Position im Ukraine-Krieg als neutral darstelle, obwohl Peking "ein möglichst schnelles Ende des Ukraine-Kriegs will – aber zugunsten Russlands und am besten mit der völligen Unterwerfung der Ukraine" /3
Tomorrow’s German election could be Europe’s most pivotal since Brexit 2016. Can a functioning coalition emerge? Or will Germany turn ungovernable? What’s at stake for Europe’s future? A short 🧵/1
Polls favour @_FriedrichMerz (CDU/CSU) to lead Germany’s next government. Yet preference falsification and @dieLinke's rise in the polls signal a wild card. Tomorrow evening we could be in for a surprising election result /2
@_FriedrichMerz @dieLinke And have a look at this electoral map. The far-right @AfD is set to surge in the East. The centre-right @CDUCSUbt is poised to win big in the West. What does that tell us about the state of German unification thirty-five years after the fall of the Berlin Wall? /3
Folks need to understand that elite capture / strategic corruption is real: in the 🇺🇸, in 🇪🇺 , wherever you look. For too long we assumed that our democratic institutions could withstand the onslaught of corporate and foreign government lobbying / influence / interference /1
What started with the Schroederisation of politics has now morphed into institutional corruption. This is the inconvenient truth, the 🐘 in the room. We now not only need strengthened 🇪🇺 military capabilities but also national and transnational movements against corruption /2
Self-serving European elites contributed to today’s mess just as much as the true believers of the MAGA movement. Both have major blind spots, just different ones. The resulting #hypernormalisation prevents necessary reforms aimed at enhancing transparency and accountability /3
German strategic culture remains stuck in the outdated paradigm of economic interdependence. Although 'change through trade' has been discredited, no new strategic framework has emerged to take its place. This shift would require not only new ideas but also fresh leadership /1
I was intrigued by Johannes Volkmann @jbvolkmann, a 27-year-old candidate for the German Bundestag. As the grandson of the former German Chancellor Helmut Kohl, he may come to represent a new generation of German politicians /2 hessenschau.de/politik/johann…
I noted with great interest that he has an academic background in Contemporary Chinese Studies from Oxford, complemented by his year spent in 🇨🇳 at both Tongji University and Peking University. He appears to possess the much-needed 'China competence.' /3 johannes-volkmann.de/uebermich/