Andreas Fulda 🇺🇦 🇹🇼 Profile picture
May 17, 2021 18 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Have you ever wondered how the Chinese Communist Party's censorship regime works at home and abroad? What follows is a short thread 🧵 /1
The CCP's sharp power works with the help of the *simultaneous* use of carrots and sticks. In my book "The Struggle for Democracy in Mainland China, Taiwan and Hong Kong" I called the carrots rule by bribery and the sticks rule by fear /2
A key instrument is the psychological warfare technique of ‘decomposition’ (Zersetzung) against domestic and international opponents of the regime /3
The CCP's threatening posture leads to imagined and / or realistic fear among members of the target audience. The result is individual and institutional self-censorship. Why is self-censorship so corrosive? /4
People start worrying about upsetting Chinese partner organisations / funders; fear putting colleagues / family / friends in China at risk; and / or fear losing access to China. Such conflict avoidance means that individuals are afraid to ‘live in truth’ (Václav Havel) /5
Another outcome of censorship is enforced silence. Open discourse about China is seen as a dangerous act. Victims of CCP censorship need to justify silence to avoid cognitive dissonance. And those who do not want to be silent are likely to feel guilty (internal dilemma) /6
Yet there are also those who want to continue to collaborate with “official China” regardless of the political limitations. When there are no red lines to such an unconditional engagement, however, we can observe highly problematic coping strategies /7
Coping strategy 1: Wilfully playing down valid empirical evidence in order to appease Chinese authorities /8
Coping strategy 2: An alternative excuse is claim to discuss sensitive issues behind ‘closed doors’ only /9
Coping strategy 3: Fig leaf events to appease one's conscience /10
Ultimately, the political and psychological costs of the CCP's censorship are enormous /11
It leads to the open or tacit support for ‘official China’ (represented by the party-state) and the marginalisation of ‘unofficial China’ (by which I mean Chinese citizens who seek autonomy from the CCP and who no longer accept its rule by fear) /12
Acceptance of the CCP's censorship normalises the Chinese party-state /13
There is subsequently also no empathy and no solidarity with the many victims of CCP rule /14
Acceptance of the CCP's political censorship also leads to a denial of the values of one’s own socialisation process and the lowering of one’s own standards /15
And another impact of not mounting any resistance to political censorship is that one loses the respect of the Chinese Communist Party, which leads to an encouragement for even more aggressive behaviour /16
To a certain extent we are all victims of the CCP's totalitarian rule. But we don't have to accept this predicament. I firmly believe that we can overcome political censorship through solidarity and collective action /17
Did I perhaps overlook some important aspects related to the phenomenon of the CCP's censorship regime? Do you agree or disagree? What can we do beyond standing in solidarity with one another to overcome CCP censorship? Your comments and reflections are most welcome /End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andreas Fulda 🇺🇦 🇹🇼

Andreas Fulda 🇺🇦 🇹🇼 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AMFChina

Aug 7
There is no other way to put it: this article is an example of a dysfunctional and moralised discourse about threat frames in public policy. It's high time for us to move towards an evidence-based approach towards geopolitical risk management. A short🧵/1 carnegieendowment.org/research/2025/…
Efforts by politicians to 'persuade through fear appeals' are criticised. Drawing on McCarthy ('Red Scare') and George W. Bush ('Global War on Terror') the costs of 'instrumentalizing threats' are highlighted. The article then pivots to the case of China, but fails to convince /2 Image
While I appreciate that the author is most likely motivated by a desire to advance constructive 🇨🇳 engagement, I find it irritating that the overall argument is littered with logical fallacies. While they could be unintentional, they weaken the persuasiveness of the article /3
Read 11 tweets
Aug 3
"Hexenjagd auf Akademiker"? Bei solcher Rhetorik werde ich hellhörig. Sowohl der Diskurs zu 🇷🇺 als auch 🇨🇳 gilt als stark polarisiert. Ich habe mir also mal das Gespräch zwischen Mangott und Lottaz angehört. Ein🧵basierend auf Lakoffs Theorie zu framing /1 Image
Die Sprachforschung kann uns dabei helfen, die Rhetorik im Gespräch einzuordnen: Metaphern prägen laut George Lakoff unsere jeweilige Weltsicht. Bei Konservativen gelte beispielsweise das 'strict father' frame, bei Progressiven hingegen das frame des 'nurturant parent' /2 Image
In der Außenpolitik können die beiden Metaphern allerdings auch kombiniert werden. Eine pro 🇺🇦 Position kann das 'strict father' frame (Putin als Aggressor) mit 'nurturant parent' frame (Ukraines Souveränität muss gewahrt werden) verbinden. Wie machen das Mangott und Lottaz? /3
Read 10 tweets
Jul 22
Are you a 🕊️ dove or 🦅 hawk on dealing with the Chinese Communist Party? The polarisation between engagement / peaceful co-existence vs. containment / confrontation dominates western 🇨🇳 debates. But can we reframe the metaphors for a smarter middle ground? A short 🧵/1 Image
In my book 'Germany and China' I have argued that a middle ground between competing policy images exists, understood as a 'mixture of empirical information and emotive appeals' (Pal, 2014). This middle ground is marginalised as both camps use frames which seem non-compatible /2 Image
Image
First example: When 🕊️ doves push dialogue and cooperation with 🇨🇳 on climate change, 🦅 hawks scoff: Aren't they trapped by the CCP's restricted, politically managed communication channels, risking cooptation? How could we reframe this for more critical China engagement? /3
Read 10 tweets
Jun 20
Wadephuls Mantra einer “Außenpolitik aus einem Guss” soll harmonisch, einheitlich oder nahtlos wirken, als wäre diese Politik in einem einzigen, ununterbrochenen Prozess entstanden. Tatsächlich ist die 🇩🇪 Außenpolitik durch Zielkonflikte gekennzeichnet /1 spiegel.de/politik/deutsc…
Dieser Slogan erinnert mich an meine Arbeit in der Entwicklungszusammenarbeit (EZ). Das BMZ sprach in den Nullerjahren auch immer von “EZ aus einem Guss”. Dem Entwicklungsministerium war vor 20 Jahren bereits die politische Steuerung der Vorfeld-Organisation GTZ entglitten /2
Wenn ich heute “Außenpolitik aus einem Guss” höre zeigt mir das, dass sich strukturell nichts verbessert hat. Das BMZ hätte längst in das AA integriert werden müssen. Geschehen ist nichts. Und jetzt kaschiert das AA den Bedeutungsverlust ggü. dem Kanzleramt mit solchen Slogans /3
Read 4 tweets
May 26
Martin Schulz, Vorsitzender der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, lobte 2021 in einem Brief die Kommunistische Partei Chinas. Lob bekam die Partei dafür, mit angeblich 'konventionellen Mitteln' Covid-19 'weitestgehend wirksam' eingedämmt zu haben. Ein kurzer🧵/1 bild.de/politik/inland…Image
Image
Die Vertuschung der ersten Fälle in Wuhan, Zwangsinternierungen von Erkrankten während der strikten Null-Covid-Strategie, die Verhinderung einer unabhängigen Untersuchung des Covid-19-Ausbruchs: für den FES-Vorsitzenden anscheinend keine Rede wert /2 bbc.co.uk/news/world-asi…Image
Was erklärt den Fehltritt von #Schulz? Sein Brief lässt sich mit der Forschung von Robert Jervis erklären. Jervis erklärt, wie kognitive Verzerrungen und psychologische Mechanismen die Wahrnehmung von Entscheidungsträgern in der internationalen Politik beeinflussen können /3 Image
Read 11 tweets
May 25
Spannender Artikel von @DietmarPichler1 zur #Propaganda der KP Chinas, mit meinen Einschätzungen 👇

Pichler: Ohne Namen zu nennen: wie schätzen Sie die Positionen der Sinologen und anderer China Experten ein, auch wenn es um China und den russischen Angriffskrieg geht? /1 🇨🇳🇷🇺 Image
Fulda: Während viele Sinologen sich in ihrer Forschung auf kulturelle oder historische Themen konzentrieren, gibt es einige wenige China-Experten, die sich publizistisch oder in Standpunkten auch zur Rolle Chinas in der Geopolitik äussern. /2
Dabei sind mir in letzter Zeit einige Redefiguren aufgefallen, die ich für problematisch halte. Die Kommunistische Partei Chinas wird von ihnen als strategisch wichtiger Gesprächspartner aufgewertet... /3
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(