I think the big missing piece about all the new breathless reporting about UFOs these days is that there's nothing new here.

Some people in the government and military are UFO true believers, and have been for a while. Suddenly, they're getting lots of mainstream press.
But, judging from my timeline, the widespread perception is that there is something important driving this, like an imminent revelation or brand new evidence or something.

I'll believe it when I see it, but for now this just looks like a triumph of UFOlogy PR. They've made it!
What do you think @GEghigian?
OK, lots of people are mad at these tweets in my mentions.

My position on the matter is complex, but thankfully shared by @AstroKatie, who has explained her thinking expertly here:

blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/a…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jason Wright

Jason Wright Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Astro_Wright

19 May
I know a lot of people want to identify parallels between SETI and UFOlogy. There are a few big differences, though:

1) SETI is based on the premise that alien tech follows the laws of physics as we know them. UFOlogy identifies alien tech from *violations* of those laws.
1 (cont) Asking me to consider UFOs as alien is asking me to believe *two* very unlikely things: that they are visiting and imperfectly hiding, *and* that it's possible to violate conservation of momentum! This is not a parsimonious explanation for these things.
2) SETI is all about the hunt for good candidates, ones that can definitively survive intense scrutiny. Right now, we have virtually none (I'd say the Wow! signal is the best).

UFOlogy is awash in candidates. It's starting from the opposite side of the problem.
Read 8 tweets
8 Oct 19
A hearty congratulations to Michel Mayor & Didier Queloz, for kickstarting the field that I've built my career in! Their discovery of 51 Peg b happened in my senior year of high school, and I started working in exoplanets in 2000, when ~20 were known.

A thread:
The Nobels serve a funny place in science: they are wonderful public outreach tools, and a chance for us all to reflect on the discoveries that shape science. The discussions they engender are, IMO, priceless.
They also have their flaws: because they are only be awarded to 3 at a time, they inevitably celebrate the people instead of the discovery.
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(