[DOWNLOAD: Philippine Open Covid Contracts Dataset v1]
We (@wesolveph@covidbudgetph@HivosROSEA)
are releasing for public use our study+dataset+code on P20 billion worth of covid-related government contracts in the Philippines.
1/ Our open contracting dataset covers:
- 581 contracts with 120 variables
- 2,832 items with 11 variables
- worth P20 billion (60% of value of publicly available contracts as of 3 Aug 2020)
- internal + market prices
- code for price analysis
- raw files
- data documentation
3/ Jose Rueda, Ella Rosales, and I presented our team's findings during the Open Government Week @opengovPH session co-hosted by @R2KRN_PH@wesolveph@covidbudgetph this morning.
P13.3 billion of items (66% of value) did not have sufficient descriptions to compare price or quality.
P319 to P550 million in possible savings if high-priced goods bought at median (+10%) prices*
*high risk items, but can't conclude fraud given limited docs.
5/ While our research cannot be used to conclude fraud or corruption, we share a method for quantifying and mitigating risk in new rounds of covid-related purchases and future emergencies.
Method can be used to identify priority contracts to check, given limited time.
6/ Here are our key recos to improve procurement data quality and to mitigate systemic risks in procurement by engaging civil society.
We invite everyone to critique, build on, improve our Philippine open covid contracts dataset to engage with the procuring entities you know.
7/ To make open contracting inclusive, we need to listen to and learn from experiences of local organizers.
8/ Here are some proposed ways to collaborate in a civic movement to strengthen procurement.
Inspired by the same spirit as election integrity movements who watch votes, we too have the right and responsibility to watch government contracts that determine the use of our taxes.
9/ This study is a labor of love from a community of 24 researchers who worked with 36 people in government, journalism, academe, and civil society, to publish this study.
It really does take a village to do research. We are thankful to receive mentorship and support to do this.
As of end-June 2020, gov't raised P3 trillion in cash from revenues (A) and debt (C). Gov't "spent" P2 trillion (B).
Net cash raised (A+C-B) is P988 billion.
2/n
1.1. We should thank our career officials for raising P3 T in cash:
P1.45 T is from tax and non-tax revenues
P1.55 T is financing from domestic (80%) and external (20%) sources
Borrowing cash is okay as long as: 1. We need the money. We do. 2. We can pay it back. We can.
3/n
1.2. Gov't spent P3 T in cash. P410 B of this is cash transferred to LGUs' bank accounts.
We urge LGUs to follow Gumaca, Quezon's example and report COVID-19 spending. In the last President's Report (June 29) only P5.5 B of P37 B in Bayanihan LGU Grants is reported spent.
1/ All of us want to "change the system". But my teachers and mentors taught me early on that changing the system is often NOT A GLAMOROUS, FLASHY act.
It's a A SERIES OF BORING DAILY ACTS of citizenship.
2/ First, it means LISTENING to others and knowing who they are and what they need. It means suspending judgment so there is a safe space for dialogue.
Systems change only lasts with the support and inclusion of people. It starts with a genuine desire to LISTEN.
3/ Second, it means LISTENING to ourselves and BEING AWARE of our strengths and limitations. This is an EVERY DAY question we live out.
How much time can we commit? What skills and networks can we contribute? What privileges and biases do we have? Where do our ethical lines lie?
1/ I recall my own "conversion" from the moving cars to the moving people perspective in public transport.
It was uncomfortable. I had to admit that whenever I rode a private car, I was slowing down other commuters who took public transport.
2/ My riding a car slowed down the poor: 88 percent of households cannot afford a car. My riding a car also slowed down other cars. My riding a car slowed down EVERYONE.
3/ I had to admit I was wrong. That I made a mistake. That my earlier view of measuring traffic as the flow of cars, and not as the flow of people, was anti-poor.