Share this page!

Steve Peers Profile picture
Twitter logo
18 May, 4 tweets, 2 min read
German constitutional court backs off further challenge to European Central Bank following last year's judgment
Key reasons for the ruling in the press release - ECB and German government and Parliament have done enough to address concerns in the previous judgment
Very good summary of the legal background to today's ruling in this thread
Very interesting first take on today's German constitutional court judgment on EU monetary policy

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Steve Peers

Steve Peers Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @StevePeers

Steve Peers Profile picture
18 May
Falsehood from Lord Frost. Waiving a visa requirement for short stays involving paid activities falls far short of free movement of people.
Lord Frost has been the chief Brexit negotiator for some time. It's hard to believe such a basic error is accidental. Whether it's gross incompetence or a deliberate lie, either should disqualify him from his post.
The problem with Brexity untruths isn't merely historical. They are now being deployed by these fanatics to damage any prospect of a closer relationship with the EU *as a non-EU country* - even if it damages a British industry, as it does here.
Read 5 tweets
Steve Peers Profile picture
17 May
Folks who hate the EU arguing in a non-EU court that the EU has breached EU law. The interesting wrinkle though is that courts in the UK *can* refer questions relating to much of the Protocol to the CJEU.
In fact, arguably UK courts *must* refer questions about the protocol's compatibility with EU law to the CJEU, if they think it's invalid. That's the obligation for EU courts (Art 267 TFEU & case law), and the protocol extends Art 267 to UK courts re much of the protocol.
As for the human rights points, the freedom of expression (Art 10 ECHR) point is weak for reasons set out here -
But the free elections point (Art 3, protocol 1 ECHR) is sounder - cf Matthews v UK, where Gibraltar residents ought to get a vote re EU law.
Read 12 tweets
Steve Peers Profile picture
13 May
Time for a deep dive into the details of and issues in the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill

Might be a longish thread - sorry
Here's the bill - bills.parliament.uk/Publications/4…

Govt memorandum - bills.parliament.uk/Publications/4…

Explanatory notes - bills.parliament.uk/Publications/4…

Impact assessment - bills.parliament.uk/Publications/4…

Delegated powers memo - bills.parliament.uk/Publications/4…
I'll be referring to the bill, the memorandum, and the explanatory notes.

The notes say (para 63) that the govt 'is publishing an ECHR memorandum which explains in detail its assessment of the compatibility of the Billʹs provisions with the Convention rights'

No sign of it yet
Read 60 tweets
Steve Peers Profile picture
12 May
The bill would protect invited speakers, but does not require them to be invited.
Here are the key obligations for higher education providers. There are similar provisions on student unions.
Here's a transcript of the minister's comments. She does *not* seem to be suggesting that Holocaust deniers etc *must* be invited to speak...
Read 4 tweets
Steve Peers Profile picture
12 May
Bill to repeal the Fixed Term Parliament Act now published (PDF link works, HTML version doesn't yet) -
bills.parliament.uk/bills/2859
The text of the bill fits into a single screenshot
(Leaving aside the schedule of consequential amendments to other legislation, which is seven pages)
Read 4 tweets
Steve Peers Profile picture
12 May
CJEU clarifies application of the 'double jeopardy' rule within EU. Once this person's criminal liability was ruled on in Germany, other Member States could not arrest him as regards the same facts, even on the basis of Interpol red notice issued by USA:
The CJEU also interprets the EU law on data protection and law enforcement (which is distinct from/parallel to the GDPR) in this context.
Interesting CJEU AG opinion on sanctions - not *EU* sanctions here, but US sanctions (in this case Trump's sanctions on Iran) vs. EU law intended to block companies from compliance with non-EU sanctions. Full text of opinion - curia.europa.eu/juris/document…
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @StevePeers has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @StevePeers!

Read all threads by @StevePeers

:(