To be bluntly Deweyan, calls to return to "normal," embodied in the elimination of masking and social distancing restrictions, demonstrate that our culture has neither grown nor learned anything from the ongoing pandemic. Instead, it simply wants to reinstitute a previous order.
To be clear: growth, for Dewey, is the integration of previous experience into the present for the sake of future action. Communication enables this individual process to take place on a cultural level, thereby allowing cultures, nations, what have you, to grow and change.
Growth happens in response to an environment as a process of inquiry. Again, on a cultural level, this requires the integration of multiple experiences of the world through culture such that we engage in collective inquiry to resolve a problematic situation.
So, when I say that our culture has not grown, and that calls to return to normal demonstrate this, what I'm saying is that our culture has learned nothing from the ways the pandemic has intensified the stark divides already present in our society.
I am saying that our culture has learned nothing from the ways that it literally threw disabled people under the bus in its pandemic response and its rush to "return to normal." Further, it has learned nothing about the character of its people through their conduct.
That is, we treat the politicization of public safety as a spectacle, and not a diagnosis of something broken in our society. We treat the ways our pandemic response failed disabled people and people of color as not worth considering in future efforts.
Moreover, it has demonstrated the fundamentally callous nature of our social priorities (and yes, this ALSO is a shot at "the left" because it is complicit) where basic human rights are concerned.
Put simply, the pandemic provided a whole host of cultural experiences across multiple institutions from which our society could have learned, could have grown, and instead we chose to ignore almost all the experience of the pandemic to rush towards a "normal."
So, for me, I don't want things to go back to "normal." For many of us, normal was an unsustainable set of conditions that we we barely survived. Normal was a hostile environment that actively resisted attempts to make it more livable.
What I want is for our society to integrate the experiences of those harmed by our pandemic response, those of us victimized by the way the pandemic intensified the fractures in our society, into our present activities for the sake of a better future, not a return to "normal."
Instead, what I'm getting is a rush to normal that is acting like a collective "forgetting" of all the suffering we endured, which is bullshit. Fuck "return to normal," build something better.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Johnathan Flowers wants to see academia fall.

Dr. Johnathan Flowers wants to see academia fall. Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @shengokai

21 May
Nothing an institution does is ever "by accident." Not a goddamned thing. Institutional outcomes are the result of a series of choices, choices which become habits, that structure the activities of the institution. Here's the thing: you CAN judge an institution by its choices.
If we're going to take Dewey seriously, that the character of an individual is the result of the integration of their habits in conduct, the same is true of institutions. The character of an institution is an outcome of the integration of its habits in conduct. This is important.
So, when someone says an institution is racist, ableist, sexist, transphobic, or oppressive in a broad sense, we're describing the character of the institution as experienced by its members. Again, the character of an institution is the integration of its habits into conduct.
Read 15 tweets
21 May
Here's the thing: educational institutions' failure to provide equitable learning conditions for disabled students during remote learning was a choice. It was an intentional choice. There's nothing "accidental" about it: they could've done more but they chose not to.
Just as they choose to provide the minimum necessary support for disabled students in times of "normal" education. Just as they choose not to take seriously student complaints that faculty aren't honoring their accommodations, or penalizing them for making the request.
These are choices, decisions made by institutions to allow some students to succeed at the expense of others because, put simply, the academy views disability as a burden, as something to be accommodated or overcome, and not as the lived reality of students, faculty, and staff.
Read 4 tweets
11 May
I find it odd that the Netflix translation of Seven Deadly Sins translates Shisha no Miyako as "Necropolis." I mean, "Shisha no Miyako" translates to "Capital of the Dead," whereas I would translate Necropolis to "Shisha no Machi," which is literally "City of the Dead."
Now, "Necropolis" might've been a creative choice to emphasize the importance of the location, but that doesn't track with me. I suppose it makes sense because the subs refer to it as "The Necropolis," like a proper noun.
They also translate "sate sate sate" as "well that's a good question," which odd to me: "sate" and "satteto" have the force of "well" or "well, let's see." I guess the localization makes sense, but I'd do something like "well, well, well, I guess we'll have to go and find out."
Read 7 tweets
9 May
There's a whole generation of scholars struggling to find full-time employment while assholes call for the cancellation of whole universities, publish transphobic dreck, and create journals to avoid accountability for publishing bigotry as scholarship.
And yet, somehow the problem is that academics are "too liberal," "too woke," "too left," and "indoctrinating our students." Somehow, the problem is "free speech" no longer being tolerated in the academy. Somehow, the problem is "cancel culture."
You know what, Henri Ducard was right:
Read 4 tweets
9 May
Today I submitted five different applications to five different application portals for jobs that required five different sets of documents and five different letters presenting my skills.
Of the five jobs, none of them required me to submit a diversity statement. Two of them required teaching statements. One of them wanted me to combine my teaching statement and my cover letter. Two of them required a cover letter and a research statement.
All of them required a teaching portfolio, albeit differently. One of them wanted summaries of my evaluations (see my eval tweet for that), three of them wanted FULL evaluations, and one of them wanted full evals and class observations.

All of them wanted sample syllabi.
Read 7 tweets
4 May
If I were to write a novel, it would be a heist novel about stealing a starship, Oceans 11 style, only for the protagonists to discover that the starship contracted them to do it.

(Ocean’s 11 but with starships!)
The second novel would probably be the sibling ship kidnapping it’s own captain and crew to bring in the ship that had… uh… stolen itself. Both ships get arrested in the end.

(Taken, but with a confused, angry starship!)
The third novel, predictably, would be both ships executing a prison break (how do you even imprison a starship?) with their respective crews, just to completely fuck with prison break tropes.

(Escape from Alcatraz but with starships!)
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(