So just how big was the VIP lane?

Well, we know from the NAO report that there were 47 companies in it. nao.org.uk/wp-content/upl…
And we know that what Cabinet Office told the Public Accounts Committee was that the total value of contracts awarded through the VIP lane was £1.7bn (committees.parliament.uk/publications/4…).
We know civil servants complained that VIPs, largely introduced by Ministers says the NAO, inhibited their ability to source PPE.

The lives of doctors and nurses could well have been lost due to the politically connected wanting to make a quick buck out of human tragedy.
But how much did it cost us? Was it 'only' the £1.7bn Cabinet Office told the PAC?

Well, there are more revelations to come. But so far @GoodLawProject has revealed the names of six VIPs. goodlawproject.org/update/awarded…
The total value of the contracts won by the six was £1.172bn. If the six were representative of the 47 the total would be £9.18bn - a lot bigger than the £1.7bn figure given by Cabinet Office.

But however you do the maths it's hard to believe the £1.7bn figure can be right.
We may well never - barring a leak - learn the truth. Ministers don't want the embarrassment and won't tell you the names of their VIP friends who benefitted.

And there is now a suspicion, at least, that we have been misled about how deep was the trough.
This is really, really poor stuff.

And it isn't helped by rank dishonesty like this from Government's press statement yesterday (gov.uk/government/new…).
This too, in that self-same press statement, will, very soon, come back to bite Government. Early next week @GoodLawProject will send out (and this is no exaggeration) extraordinary unpublished materials to those on our free mailing list.

Sign up here: glplive.org/ppe-subscribe

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jo Maugham

Jo Maugham Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JolyonMaugham

19 May
Those who do not like the work that I - and @GoodLawProject - do are always looking for ways to silence or punish me or us for it.

One of the most oft-used mechanics is referring me to my professional regulator. I have been the subject of literally hundreds of complaints.
The work I do has to strike a balance between a number of considerations and it is difficult consistently to get that balance right. There is an embedded possibility - or even likelihood - that one day I will stray beyond the boundaries of the acceptable.
In the meantime, I actively welcome, indeed I encourage, regulatory oversight.
Read 7 tweets
15 May
If you can't see how revolting The Times has become imagine this headline instead.
In recent weeks The Times has progressed from campaigning against trans people to attack our leading racial equality charity and now traveller communities. History has lessons for us about standing by whilst 'other' minorities are targeted - and the importance of solidarity.
What I don't get is, what's wrong with people being different? Why shouldn't people travel if they want to? Why can't we have decent spaces for them? Why do we all have to live like The Times thinks best? Aren't all our lives made better by rubbing up against difference?
Read 4 tweets
15 May
Priti Patel takes time off from bullying her staff to breach the ministerial code by trying to help an associate win a PPE contract. mol.im/a/9580491
Jassal's client went on to win a £103m contract, the award of which we are judicially reviewing. crowdjustice.com/case/contracts…
This case 👆 may be the most important @GoodLawProject is involved in. We have received leaks of information from multiple sources. And we are slowly piecing the puzzle together. We still need more but there is a real suggestion of corruption about the emerging picture.
Read 5 tweets
5 May
🚨@WindrushLives Closing Thread🚨

We’ll be off in a minute, so a few final thoughts:

First, we hope you’ll agree that the Windrush Compensation Scheme doesn’t work, was never really intended to, and is an insult to victims, for whom #WindrushInjustice continues.
Where do we go from here?

It is vital to centre the lives and experiences of Windrush survivors and to continue to keep tabs on and understand how the compensation scheme is really working (or not) for the people that matter – the claimants.
To that end, we are delighted to announce a collab to rival Ivy Park (ok, not really): @WindrushLives x @GoodLawProject will in short order be publishing a questionnaire designed to gather the data that the Home Office can’t, or won’t.
Read 25 tweets
5 May
🚨@WindrushLives Thread🚨

Let’s interrogate what reparation for the #WindrushInjustice ought to look like.

Strategically, we are committed to improving the existing Scheme ASAP and taking it away from the HO so that claimants can get the compensation they are owed. [1/20]
But that word - ‘owed’ - is an important one here. The injustice done to the Windrush generation and their families is about more than material losses from loss of employment, for example, although that is of course a big part of the harm done. [2/20]
It is also about the stripping of citizenship and the rights that come with it, and deprivation of dignity, identity and a sense of belonging. [3/20]
Read 20 tweets
5 May
🚨THREAD🚨
You’ve now seen the scale and depth of very much ongoing #WindrushInjustice. You’ve heard directly from victims.

Even more than an advocacy and support group, @WindrushLives is a network of victims, and this is what we want: [1/7]
This demand - that the Scheme be taken out of the @ukhomeoffice - is based on the Home Office's own stats. As experts inc @JacquiMckenzie6 have noted, the HO is barely keeping its head above water with a little over 2.5k claims - between 17-20% of its own expected total. [2/7]
It’s also based on the fact of the hostile environment. Virulent racism and a rabid desire to throw people out of the country under any manageable pretext are just *fundamentally incompatible* with restorative justice and reparations. We can’t believe this needs saying. WL [3/7]
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(