There is some confusion over the travel regulations and what has changed (and confusing messaging)
The truth is that policy over international travel has been confused throughout the pandemic, which suggests (to me, based on experience) policy disagreements
(thread)
The government toyed with the idea that international travel was banned under the various "stay at home" regulations but it was only recently (29 March) when the Steps regulations came into force that international travel without a "reasonable excuse" was explicitly prohibited
The "don't travel outside the UK without a reasonable excuse" law lasted until Monday 18 May, so only about 7 weeks.
Hotel quarantine - though discussed since Feb 2020 - only came into law on 15 February 2021
The "travel regulations" which include compulsory testing and self-isolation (now for "Amber List" countries) have evolved since being introduced on 8 June 2020 - but they have never included an international travel ban *out* of the UK.
Weirdly, the international travel ban out of the UK was contained in the lockdown "Steps" regulations only.
Anyway, what this suggests to me (as an observer the evolution of these regulations) is that there has never been much stomach for restrictions on travel out of the UK...
... as demonstrated by the only occasional use of explicit laws to restrict it.
There has also been a lot of talk about the confusion between guidance and law during the pandemic - this applies particularly to international travel and we are seeing it acutely in recent days...
... since the travel ban (Regulation 8) was taken out of the steps regulations entirely so leaving much of the work to guidance - except hotel quarantine for return from "red list" countries, self-isolation from Amber list and mandatory testing.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
You may have noticed I have been quiet on the current conflict. That is deliberate - what is happening in Israel-Palestine is very personal for me for various reasons. The issue is hugely important - from a human rights perspective - but not one which I am a particular expert on
and I feel that others on this platform are better placed to comment than I am. I have, as some will know, experienced some difficult and scary situations over the past few years relating to antisemitism and other abuse and I have become a bit more circumspect about what I...
I have no idea if they are substantially different or not - the explanatory note is extremely sparse!
I'm not going to be able to spend the next hour reading the 91 pages for you I'm afraid!
Interestingly, there has been no amendment yet to the Steps regulations to put the country into Step 3 from Monday, or to get rid of the "reasonable excuse" requirement for foreign travel. This is either coming shortly or the govt is going to delay it.
I was involved in a campaign at my university to stop David Irving coming to speak, which was successful. It would have been utterly ridiculous (indeed, grotesque) he had been compensated for being disinvited.
I think there are complex issues around freedom of speech and speech which is not illegal, but I am confident those issues are better dealt with on the ground then by some government quango which has been expressly set up to protect particular political viewpoints
The particular example of David Irving is instructive. It was not clear cut that he would be disinvited (indeed, he was reinvited a 2 years later), but there was a thoughtful campaign and debate. There was no attempt to involve law which is not always the sharpest tool in the box
The Prime Minister has confirmed that "Step 3" restrictions will come into force, as expected, from Monday 17 May. Short summary in the thread below (which also explains the context).
What you won't find in the regulations is the "you can now hug" rule - that's because the recommendation against hugging has been part of social distancing guidance, not law.
But we are now all so hopelessly confused about the difference that I forgive you
What is really important is that I can from Monday update my thread on the indoor 'sex ban' - a real ban, illegal - for people who don't live together and aren't in a linked household, in place in some parts of the UK for well over a year!