There are those who believe that R voters support the Maricopa recount and voter suppression and future-vote invalidation efforts by Rs in swing states because they believe the Big Lie that the 2020 election really was stolen. 1/8
But those who “believe” the Big Lie at this point can only do so because it is *existential* for them to believe it-- that is, because they want and indeed have to believe it.

Consequently, it doesn’t really matter to them whether it is true or not at this point. 2/8
Mary Trump has said that we shouldn’t even try to understand her uncle. How much of it is lying on Trump’s part, how much of it is authoritarianism pure and simple, how much of it is narcissistic delusion? According to her, it is pointless to ask this kind of question. 3/8
Trump’s mind is too messed up for this kind of question to even make any sense--and never did, according to her. 4/8
Similarly, it is pointless now to ask whether R voters are deluded (that is, really believe the election was stolen) or are simply revealing themselves to be authoritarian fascists at heart. 5/8
On the question of whether the 2020 election was stolen, *both* these things are true, and really amount to the same thing. 6/8
Another way of putting this: *we* believe in a fact-based reality. They do not. For them, there is nothing beyond what they want to believe, which for them is a higher truth. 7/8
Did Hitler and Goebbels believe in *their* Big LIes? This kind of question misses the fundamental point. The truth is that both wanted to spit on our very notion of truth. So does Trump, and he’s got most of the R party following him as their cult leader. 8/8

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas Wood 🌊

Thomas Wood 🌊 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @twoodiac

4 May
@ParryPierce Just to be clear: Dershowitz’s position (so far as it can made out) is absurd--and will prove to be yet another embarrassment to Harvard Law (along with the likes of Josh Hawley, Ted Cruz, and Kayleigh McEnany). 2/19
@ParryPierce First of all, there is absolutely no evidence that the attorney-client privilege was violated in this case, because of the well-known and well-tested crime-fraud exception to that privilege. 3/19
@ParryPierce This is especially important here, because the attorney-client privilege was, it appears, annulled in this search warrant decision, meaning that Trump is quite possibly in trouble. 4/19
Read 19 tweets
2 May
Washington Post, New York Times, NBC retract reports that said Giuliani was warned by FBI he was target of Russian disinformation operation - CNN cnn.com/2021/05/01/med…
While it’s crucial that the media get the story right, so far as Giuliani is concerned this isn’t a big deal. This couldn’t have come much of a surprise: there have been rumors for months that he has been under investigation by the feds. 1/3
And SDNY probably had the goods on Rudy already. But what Michael Cohen and others are pointing out now is that *Trump* and his allies have to be worried about communications Giuliani had with *them*. 2/3
Read 4 tweets
14 Feb
McConnell is getting high marks for his speech, even from some Ds. He does deserve credit for torching Trump for his conduct. Even so, his main argument--that the Senate properly acquitted b/c only a sitting officer can be convicted--is disgraceful. 1/22 tinyurl.com/yxzedgcr
McConnell’s argument is based on the entirely erroneous and unsubstantiated allegation that the Constitution considers only two possible kinds of individuals: (1) private citizens, and (2) a POTUS, VPOTUS, or government official currently in office. 2/22
This is nonsense. There are THREE types of individuals to consider under the Constitution: the two kinds McConnell mentions, and *a person who is a private individual NOW who WAS an officer and who engaged in impeachable conduct when he or she WAS in office*! 3/22
Read 25 tweets
9 Feb
The Constitution clearly provides for the Senate to either: (1) acquit; (2) convict, remove, not disqualify; (3) convict, remove, disqualify; or (4) convict and disqualify if no longer in office. What we’re looking at, beginning tomorrow, is (4). 1/5
Senate Republicans can’t argue that disqualification is out of order because 74 million deluded and dangerous Americans voted for Trump in the last election. 2/5
Like, you know, it’s not as though the drafters of the Constitution didn’t consider the possibility that a convicted president might be popular and constitute a significant threat in the future. 3/5
Read 6 tweets
7 Feb
Section 320 of the Communications Decency Act provides in part that "no provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider." 1/11
Congressional Ds are now proposing to significantly amend Section 230.

It is easy to see why Sen. Warner’s proposed amendment is an existential threat to two major destructive forces in American cultural and political life: Facebook and MAGA. tinyurl.com/y57y9b4v 2/11
Consider the lawsuit against Fox News, which led to Lou Dobbs's termination there.

Among other things, the amendment would put FB and other social media companies in the same legal posture as Fox News in defamation lawsuits. They would no longer have any special protection. 3/11
Read 12 tweets
7 Feb
Trump’s approval rating is now around 34% (latest Gallup poll), and 63% of voters disapprove of him. And only 40% of Rs want him to run again in 2024.

But the remaining 60% is obdurate, and isn’t going away. As I see it, this is an insoluble problem for the GQP. 1/6
The GQP leadership might be thinking that the voting intensity of the MAGA right is greater than the voting intensity of non- and even anti-MAGA voters, so the party can win by presenting two quite different faces to the world, 2/6 tinyurl.com/y3xfna3e
but voters understand that one faction in a party is going to prevail over the other eventually, and it is clear now that the winning faction on the right is going to be the MAGA crazies. 3/6
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(