Ok, I have another take on the conflict between Israel and Hamas. Considering I recently wrote a book on just war, I should say something about the moral aspect of the conflict.

amazon.com/Just-Ordered-L…
Hamas is a terrorist organization that deliberately murders civilians and says it wants to destroy Israel.

Verdict: unjust, **no matter what you think of the Palestinians' cause**.

This isn't hard, people.
If you sympathize with the Palestinians, you should hate Hamas. Hamas is the greatest enemy of the Palestinians. It hijacked Palestinian autonomy for its jihadist ideology and made it essentially impossible to support Gaza without being complicit with terrorism.
"But Hamas is waging a just war for Palestinian independence against Israeli occupation."

Even if true, it would *still* be unjust for Hamas to deliberately target civilians.

Murdering civilians is bad and war doesn't change that.
Besides, Palestinian independence does not constitute a just cause for war against Israel, especially in 2021, long after Israel's withdrawal from the West Bank and Gaza and its repeated participation in negotiations to end the dispute.
Only if you think that Israel's very existence is a standing aggression against the Palestinian can you conclude that the Palestinians have a right of war against them today.

If you believe that, well, my Tweets won't convince you of anything.
Not even the UN agrees with you. The UN voted in 1947 to approve a partition plan that would create the states of Israel and Palestine, implicitly affirming that the existence of one was consistent with the other.

Israel's existence is not an aggression.
Anyway, I generally do not think wars of self-determination are self-evidently just. (See my engagement with Walzer in chapter 5 of my book.) If self-determination leads to responsible sovereignty and greater peace and justice, sure, but that is often not the case.
And also: War is supposed to be a last resort, not an ongoing threat while on-again, off-again negotiations sputter along decade after decade while one side continues to vow the eradication of the other.

Hamas' aggression this year is patently not a "last resort."
On the other side: Israel has a right to defend itself, full stop. If you are tempted to add a "but" to that sentence, stop a moment and read @JonahDispatch latest column: gfile.thedispatch.com/p/structural-a…
I do think sometimes Israel's defenders on the right use its right to exist to deflect legitimate criticisms about some of Israel's choices. It is absolutely fair to hold Israel up to a high standard.

But if it's fair to criticize Israel, it's absolutely fair to criticize Hamas.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul D. Miller

Paul D. Miller Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PaulDMiller2

19 May
There's a lot of conversation among evangelicals about manhood and womanhood. What strikes me is how little of the conversation is rooted in anything the Bible says--because the Bible does not say much about what it means to be a man *in distinction to being a woman* & vice versa
There's a culture of machismo in some corners of evangelicalism that dresses up "traditional" (1950s) masculinity as "Biblical": Men must be physically strong, assertive leaders, breadwinners, protectors, etc. Go read @kkdumez book.
Thing is, all these notions of "traditional" masculinity mostly don't come from the Bible; they come from culture and biology. Testosterone makes muscles grow and tends to incline people to stronger feelings of aggression, competition, and drive. These traits get called "manly."
Read 10 tweets
16 May
Jesus movies generally don't work. Growing up I watched Franco Zeffirelli's "Jesus of Nazareth," (1977) and the old-Hollywood big-budget "King of Kings" (1961). Never thought very highly of them. They make Jesus look stoned or boring.
There's a real challenge presenting Jesus in a dramatic narrative. It's hard to give him a character arc. Arcs depend on overcoming weakness, flaw, or failure. See also: Paradise Lost. God shows up and turns the tide of battle without effort. It's not dramatically satisfying.
So years ago I remarked to a friend that the real way to make a Jesus movie was to make the movie about Peter. Peter works better as a main character because he is us: relatably flawed, entirely and only human, and sometime a little dumb.
Read 8 tweets
9 Jan
"You're not allowed to condemn one bad thing unless you condemn all bad things in the order and with the intensity I prefer," is another bad take.
I've seen a lot of "If you didn't condemn the riots last summer, I don't want to hear about the Capitol riot." For the record, I did condemn the riots (and the police brutality) last summer. But so what if I didn't? So what if we choose different battles to fight?
I used to get upset when people didn't care about my pet issue--the war in Afghanistan--as much as I did. It took me years to make peace with the fact that most of you don't care and never will, even though it is literally a matter of life and death. It still hurts a little, tbh.
Read 4 tweets
9 Jan
When I studied terrorism in South Asia, I ran across a lot of literature on "de-radicalization." One thing I recall is that de-rad program were most successful when they were locally driven and involved religious leaders. In other words....
Imams who didn't believe in terrorism were the best at teaching young men to not be terrorists. They taught a version of Islam that did not lead to violence. These programs worked better than government-run programs or attempts at "modernization" whatever that is. That means....
Applying that insight to today: Christian pastors have a special responsibility and burden. They have a unique role in "de-radicalizing" the people in their pews. They need to teach the difference between Christianity and Christian nationalism.
Read 8 tweets
6 Jan
This rings hollow unless it's accompanied by a recognition of, and repentance for, how we got here. Trump's defenders, like Mohler, defended, justified, and explained Trump till now but draw the line at rioting. Maybe the road that led to the riots needs reexamination.
To put it another way, if you argue, as Mohler did, that Christians should vote for Trump with full knowledge of Trump's character and record, then you own the consequences. Pleading ignorance ("I didn't know he'd incite a riot") rings hollow because we warned this would happen
People who study politics and history for a living *knew what Trump was* from the beginning. He's a demagogue. We are not surprised by this and we warned you about it *years ago*. Trump has never shown much regard for the constitution, and today was only the latest proof.
Read 9 tweets
21 Dec 20
I see folks are ranking Star Wars again. So let me step in here and help you out.

Here is the definitive ranking of Star Wars.
Now, to do this right, we can’t just rank the Skywalker saga. We have to include the spinoffs. The cartoons. The TV series. Yes, the holidays specials. We’re going to do pretty much all of it, folks.
I will not be ranking animated shorts: Forces of Destiny, Galaxy of Adventures, Blips, Rollout. I’m going to skip the Droids and Ewoks cartoons (1985 - 87) and most Lego Star Wars content. We have to draw a line somewhere.
Read 38 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(