General practice in areas of high deprivation is under-funded and under-doctored relative to need.

Paper out today on why Govt needs to ‘level-up’ general practice & where they should focus.

🧵👇🏻 on evidence for #inversecarelaw in #generalpractice.

health.org.uk/publications/l…
Ppl who live in more deprived areas have greater health need.

-They are more likely to have multiple health conditions

-And they accumulate those conditions at an earlier age.

health.org.uk/sites/default/…

Need is 🔼, so you'd expect there to be🔼supply of health care. BUT.....
💰💰💰

- General practices serving more deprived populations receive less funding than practices serving more affluent ones.

- Once you adjust for need, practices serving the most deprived areas get around 7% less funding than practices in the most affluent areas
You’d expect practices in poorer areas, where health needs are greater to have more doctors. But no.

Once you account for need, a GP working in a practice the most deprived areas will have almost 10% more patients than a GP in the most affluent areas.
So. More health need, but less money and fewer doctors.

How does that translate to quality of care offered?

Disclaimer here is that the quality metrics available aren’t perfect, and may themselves be affected by factors related to deprivation. But….
Practices in more deprived areas earn fewer QoF points.

Which might partly nod to quality (depends on your view on how much QoF reflects quality of care), and definitely affects practice payments.
There’s a clear and persistent trend r.e patient satisfaction.

Patients in more deprived neighbourhoods report lower overall satisfaction with their #generalpractice

For more analysis of how pt satisfaction varies with deprivation/age/ethnicity:

health.org.uk/news-and-comme…
And practices in areas of high deprivation are more likely to be rated ‘inadequate’ or ‘requires improvement’ by the CQC and less likely to be ‘outstanding’.
For more detail on the above check out:

health.org.uk/publications/r…

For thoughts on what needs to be done: health.org.uk/publications/l…

& watch this space for big old piece of policy analysis of attempts to tackle the #inversecarelaw in #generalpractice
All of the above co-produced with my excellent @HealthFdn colleagues, including @cfraserepi @hughalderwick @RThorlby @pstilwell @CreinaLilburne @SeanAgass

Poss of interest @deependgp @CdsPcn @NextGGP @KirenCollison @doctor_oxford @rmsteen (apols if not)!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Becks Fisher

Becks Fisher Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BecksFisher

6 May
The last few months in #generalpractice have felt hectic, even by usual #GP standards.

short 🧵👇🏻 looks at what appointment/workforce numbers show, with some thoughts on the important bits that those numbers can't tell us....
1. Total appointment numbers in March were high (28.5m), BUT

2. The number of appointments done by GPs was particularly high (14.7m - the highest since the dataset began).

3. GPs did 2.5m more appointments in March '21 than in Feb (nb there were 3 more working weekdays)
- The absolute number (and %) of F2F appointments is creeping up (15.8m in March) AND

- The number of phone appts in March 21 (11.4m) is also the highest on record.
Read 9 tweets
13 Jan
Despite rhetoric on #healthinequalities, the current UK #vaccination strategy discriminates against poorer people.

🧵 below on why.

Immediate action needs to be allowing vacc sites to move down cohorts (& providing supply to do so)

@CdsPcn @NikkiKF @CMO_England @Jeremy_Hunt
With the exception of HCWs, the top JCVI cohorts are based on biological age.

But poverty affects life expectancy. In poor areas people don't live so long.
Our #PCN covers a highly deprived area. Most people don't live to be over 80. Or > 75 for that matter. Our first cohorts are tiny.

BUT we have huge numbers of patients in cohort 4 (over 70, and clinically extremely vulnerable). That's b/c we have LOADS of ppl w multimorbidity
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(