The long awaited cash return on operating asset tweetstorm: $TSLA and $TSLAQ, anyone interested in investing and evaluating the FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO MAKE MONEY™ of a business should read this - our research on Tesla’s profitability is in the thread as well👇👇👇👇👇0 / 11
1 - What makes a right to make money™ ? Your ability to 1) invest some money into an operating asset 2) burn some cash to operate the asset and 3) generate cash from selling the resulting product or service, in excess of cash spent on running operations.
2 - A right to make money™ is more than a competitive advantage. It is a competitive advantage at producing something, which meets a need. which is valued at more than your cost of producing it. This is profound - as @elonmusk would say.
3 - The best way to measure a right to make money™? Cash return on operating asset (CRoOA), i.e. (3-2)/1. In other words: how many cents of cash per year can you generate, out of a dollar you invest in your operations? As simple as that.
4 - Let’s now apply this to $TSLA. See chart below. CRoOA broke-even at some point in 2018 with the ramp of model 3 then went straight up to 20% in 2020.Please note: this excludes credits, we don’t care about credits, and this is 100% cash metrics, no possible accounting cheats.
5 - Key question is - how does that evolve over time. Two ways to look at it: Full utilisation - What would Tesla generate with existing assets used at full capacity, and Incremental basis, i.e. additional returns generated on incremental capital deployed in the last year.
5.1 - Full asset utilisation view: Tesla has on the ground enough assets to produce 1.05m units. If we scale out to that number current economics, i.e. with today’s cash cost per car, and ramping working capital to that scale, Tesla would generate 37% CRoOA. Pretty good!
5.2 - Incremental return view - what incremental returns on incremental assets deployed in 2020? That is 90% - even better! As Tesla grows, returns will increase rapidly. Tesla is Filling in fabs faster than growing overall capacity.
6 - conclusion. Tesla is safely heading towards 40-50% cash return on operating assets. 👇
7 - this is the basis for our profitability forecast. We assume cash profitability is stable (car selling price minus cash costs going into the car), as Tesla passes on into pricing all efficiency gains, but as assets get better utilised, profitability ands returns increase. 👇
8 - How does this compare to peer premium car manufacturers? Tesla is definitely in another league. While BMW and Daimler struggle to produce cars that don’t differentiate and get less wanted, their returns are under pressure, in teens.
9 - This actually puts Tesla in the league of players with unique fabs, producing things nobody else can produce… like TSMC. Check it out by yourself 👇Our #1 conviction on TSMC is their ability to maintain a 40% CRoOA no matter what.
10 - One last perspective: Why is Tesla so much more profitable than a BMW or a Daimler? Every step of the operating model contributes. Check for yourself: 👇
11 - This concludes our thread. CRoOA is one of the pillar of the investment research we do. It is an excellent metric to understand how good fundamentals translate into strong financial performance.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The essential pillars of democracy are: 1) freedom of expression 2) habeas corpus 3) balance of powers 4) alternance 5) constitutional reference
If you vote democrats at the next election, you lose 4 out of 5. Be a real democrat, defend democracy: vote for the other camp.
👇
Democracy is not about the popular vote.
The tyranny of the majority is not democracy.
Anyone insisting on the popular vote is a tyrant in the making. "I have the Popular vote so I do whatever I want".
Think Putin. Elected every time.
Democracy is about: 1) right to protest 2) not to fear being jailed without being judged 3) anyone in power is controlled by another independent power 4) nobody stays in power too long 5) all submits to the constitution
Long overdue research thread on what a world, in which $400bn are spent on datacenter AI chip in 2027, would look like
👇 $NVDA $AMD $AVGO $ANET and many others.
First, here is what $400bn spent on AI chips in 2027 would look like: GPU and TPU shipments quadrupling, Other in-house accelerators ramping to represent 2x the TPU footprint.
What would that imply in terms of installed base? 10m AI servers powered by 100m chips. This alone would more than double the current electricity consumption of datacenter!
What to expect for $TSLA auto gross margin next week? Well... brace for a - short-term, disappointment, with a further slide in 2Q23... But also a good recovery beyond. Here is how we looked at it 👇
Tesla lowered prices materially since the end of last summer. A great move, as it kept the company on track to grow deliveries ~50% p.a. This comes at a cost, though, driving gross margins down, from a peak of 30%, to 18.3% last quarter, adjusted for credits and leasing.
It is not the end of it. Even if price stabilized during the first quarter, we show that some further margin pressure happened in 2Q, as in 1Q still a number of cars were delivered at better prices. This means the average selling price will drop by a further $3,000 in 2Q23
A bear arguments on $NVDA is that hyperscalers will deploy their own chips to replace GPUs. The argument has been around for a while and doesn’t seem to materialize, beyond $GOOG and the TPU. Why? The promised thread. 1/9 👇
It is true that the TPU costs 3-4x less than a GPU, first because it is a less beefed-up chip (smaller die, less HBM), and also because Broadcom, who manufactures the TPU for Google, takes a lower margin. 2/9
Looking at the total cost of ownership of a TPU slice vs. an A100 HGX server, taking into account the higher efficiency of the TPU, we can conclude the latter is 4-5x more cost efficient than Nvidia’s A100. 3/9
I find the $TSLA controversy price cut vs. advertising spending interesting. My (strong) view: any dollar spent on advertising by Tesla today would be a waste for everybody: the company, investors, and clients. 👇
Spending on advertising is about 1) growing brand awareness (people know about your products) 2) growing perceived quality, differentiation, and relevance.
I don’t need to convince you Tesla doesn’t needs any of this. Tesla only needs to trigger transactions in a challenging environment for potential buyers (uncertainty and high interest rates)
I haven’t seen a single right take on Tesla’s announcement about silicon carbide yesterday (excepting ours, of course.) let me explain:
The Silicon Carbide content of a Model 3 is ~$500. The main inverter is pure SiC. In the « Model2 », that cost is not acceptable.
Tesla will therefore combine $125 of SiC with IGBT mosfets (maybe ~~$30) to reduce the bill of material. The idea of this hybrid architecture is to run most of the time on SiC and turn on IGBTs for surges (strong acceleration.)