There are two reasons the media has been softpedaling the antisemitic attacks this week.
1) The victims are Jews. 2) The attackers are Arabs.
The media has internalized the lie that Jews are privileged whites and Arabs are disadvantaged people of color. And once the identities are established, it is clear that the "whites" are in the wrong and the POC are in the right, no matter what the actual circumstances.
Since the actual facts contradict the narrative that the media has been pushing for years, there is a reluctance to contradict all that previous coverage with those false assumptions. So the media (and politicians) duck and only say anything when they are FORCED to.
The antisemitic memes that Jews control the media and the government affect even those who know it is nonsense. In the back of their minds, they don't want to be looked upon as puppets of the great Jewish/Zionist conspiracy. Hence, avoiding reporting as long as possible.
One cannot stress enough how toxic these identity politics are. And after years of modern antisemites converting Jews from racially inferior to racially privileged, they've accomplished their goal of having ordinary people look at Jews as part of the despised group.
Again.
This isn't a story about resurgent antisemitism. This is a story about antisemitism that has stealthily become part of the fabric of Western society.
Without the years of positioning Jews as the rich, successful, arrogant "chosen", the violence we've seen could never occur.
So this isn't a story about keffiyeh clad thugs, as the Israel haters take pains to try to paint it (when forced to.) It is a story of an entire mindset that the far Left has managed to create, where people are victims or victimizers, and victims are always right.
Anyone who truly cares about the future of America should be angry at what we see happening, the stealthy hate that has infected large swaths of society and that became explicit this week.
It didn't happen in a vacuum.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Another thing journalists aren't reporting:
Hamas and Islamic Jihad are hiding how many of their members have been killed.
No "martyr" announcements. Few funerals.
This is deliberate - to make it look like Israel is indiscriminately dropping bombs and killing only civilians.
If they would announce the names of their dead, it would be easy to see that many of the civilians killed were effectively meant to be human shields for them. In 2014, Hamas commanders were invariably among large families who were killed - but it took months to find that out.
In 2014, sometimes it would be found that one member of the family was a major terror leader.
More chillingly, sometimes it was found that one of the people killed with a family was a terrorist - NOT related to the family.
The Left wants to pretend that Sheikh Jarrah, or in Beinart's case the Nakba, is the original Jewish sin and the reason for all the trouble.
No, if you want to find the source, it's Palestinian Arab Jew-hatred. Everything from attacks in the 1880s to Hamas today comes from that.
When the Mufti started his antisemitic campaign in the 1920s, he had an "excuse": The Jews were threatening Al Aqsa!
People believed the excuse and excused Arab attacks.
It was a lie.
When the 1929 pogrom killing Jews throughout the land happened, the Arabs claimed it was because of Jewish immigration. Another excuse the British believed and punished the Jews as if it was the real reason.
The PA prime minister is very happy that people are dying, because that has "returned the Palestinian issue to the agenda of the world's priorities."
This is important. Since the Abraham Accords, Palestinians have been feeling irrelevant - the worst feeling for them.
1/
They felt that the world no longer cared about them - which is largely true since they couldn't even fix their own issues and kept blaming everything on Israel.
Instead of working towards peace, they wanted to feel important, to be cover stories on Time.
2/
As @palwatch has documented, the PA has worked to incite violence in Jerusalem for weeks before Ramadan. TV music videos glorified martyrdom.
They know this stuff works on their people. Sure enough, it did - starting with the TikTok attacks on religious Jews.
3/
Since everyone's doing it, here's a Twitter-friendly definition of antisemitism:
Hostility toward,
denigration of or
discrimination against
Jews
as individual Jews,
as a people,
as a religion,
as an ethnic group or
as a nation (i.e., Israel.)
Critiques welcome.
Some Jews identify as being part of the Jewish religion, some are atheists but part of the Jewish people, some as an ethnic group, some as Zionist - the Jewish nation. All of these are legitimate aspects of Jewishness.
2/
Attacking Jews as a religious group is clearly antisemitic even to Jews who don't adhere to the religion. Likewise, attacking the Jewish state is just as antisemitic as attacking the Jews as a people. Why distinguish between different aspects?
3/
Antisemitism is found everywhere. Throughout history, antisemites of all creeds, colors and political identities associate Jews with what they despise most. This is why far-Right antisemites call Jews "communists"...
1/
... while far-Left antisemites call Jews racists, colonialists and child-killers;,Black antisemites will say Jews try to control their lives by controlling their livelihoods; Muslim antisemites will say Jews are cowards and enemies of Mohammed;...
2/
...Christian antisemites will call Jews Christ-killers; Black Nation of Islam followers will call Jews slave owners.
If there is one hatred that unites the world, it is Jew-hatred.
3/
I'm looking at the Cornel West/Harvard kerfuffle, after his Haaretz interview, and I am stunned at how badly this is being misreported.
1/
He told Haaretz that there were three possible reasons for Harvard’s decision to deny a tenure review: his academic work, his age or his politics. Since the first two don't make sense he figures it must be his stance on Israel.
2/
But West is lying.
He wasn't denied tenure as many articles claim. His position wasn't ever eligible for tenure to begin with, and he knew this when he re-joined Harvard in 2016.
3/