Share this page!

Josh Barro Profile picture
Twitter logo
22 May, 4 tweets, 2 min read
This study is total methodological garbage, but people will cite it because it favors a desired political narrative.
30% of the “incidents” with race data in this sample (“incidents” defined to include accusing the CCP of covering up a lab leak) are Donald Trump personally.
The political narratives being pushed here are that white supremacy is at the root of every social ill, and that fighting hate incidents does not conflict with de-policing proposals.
It’s like when Yang said the NYPD needed to beef up its anti-Asian hate crimes unit and self-appointed Asian activists got upset about that because it conflicts with left-wing shibboleths and the media treated them like they are representative of anything. slowboring.com/p/yang-gang

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Josh Barro

Josh Barro Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jbarro

Josh Barro Profile picture
23 May
What the fuck, apparently Ryanair is cool with a passenger being kidnapped so long as they eventually get the plane back?
I know Ryanair’s signature is bad customer service but WTF
EU countries should revoke Ryanair’s operating license
Read 8 tweets
Josh Barro Profile picture
19 May
The question is what is Pride (the organization and the march, not the broad concept) for? I think it's possible Pride has served all its integrationist and acceptance functions and doesn't need to try to speak for all LGBT people anymore. nytimes.com/2021/05/18/opi…
Like, "we are everywhere, we're in your organizations, we're part of every part of the community" was a very important message for the parade to send 20 years ago. But we've won that fight.
Which is to say, that if Pride organizationally adopts an agenda that speaks for only some LGBT people, that excludes in certain ways -- maybe that's fine? Not everything has to be an umbrella, and certainly not everything has to speak for me.
Read 4 tweets
Josh Barro Profile picture
15 May
On this week’s @LRCkcrw, I diagnose the unhinged response to @ebruenig’s Mother’s Day column as largely about people not wanting to own their choices. I don’t have or want kids, I’m at peace with that, I’m not threatened when other people do differently. kcrw.com/news/shows/lef…
Often, people with above-average incomes say they “can’t afford” to have children at a certain time or a certain number of children, when what they really mean is they want to make other consumption choices. It’s fine to make other consumption choices. Stop being so defensive!
There are a lot of people with degrees from highly selective colleges who think it’s “unaffordable” to have three children in the New York area on $400,000 a year.
Read 5 tweets
Josh Barro Profile picture
7 May
(the most prestigious brand in PANTS)
Give this man the Nobel prize for literature already
“Cheugy” is over already, yes?
Read 4 tweets
Josh Barro Profile picture
6 May
I’ve been making a new mint-orange-bourbon cocktail

2oz makers mark
1/2oz mint syrup
1/2oz Napa Valley Distillery Grand California (a great orange liqueur with strong orange flavor and a bitter note)

Stir with ice, strain into a Nick and Nora glass, garnish w/ a mint sprig.
To make enough mint syrup to nearly fill a wine bottle, just bring 1.5 cup of sugar and 1.5 cup of water to boil with about 5oz of mint (two supermarket packages), steep for 15 minutes and strain.
(By which I mean, turn the heat off right after it reaches the boil and leave the saucepan undisturbed 15 minutes.)
Read 5 tweets
Josh Barro Profile picture
4 May
You are rich if you make $500,000 a year, even if you don’t consider yourself rich. Still, Dems will have a hard time agreeing to raise taxes on the rich, since some congressional Dems want to tie it to a big tax cut for the rich — SALT. businessinsider.com/people-who-mak…
Low interest rates are also a barrier to tax hikes in 2021. The usual argument for raising taxes is “someone has to pay for this.” But does someone? The ease with which we can borrow makes spending easy and taxing hard. businessinsider.com/people-who-mak…
(One thing people forget on SALT is it’s not *just* a sop to rich Democrats in blue states — public employee unions care about restoring the deduction because it makes it easier for states to tax rich people and spend the proceeds. So the issue has more legs than you’d think.)
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @jbarro has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @jbarro!

Read all threads by @jbarro

:(