Democrats: ok, we’d like to do something, maybe...good?

Republicans: hell no

Democrats: haha, ok we see where you’re coming from

Republicans: eat shit

Democrats: what if we made it worse?

Republicans: kiss my ass

Democrats: ok we made it much worse

Republicans: lol so?
Don’t scale it back to placate. Double it to show them you mean business and ram it the fuck through, and then send through another one that’s THREE times bigger to teach them not to fuck with you. People want a real solution, nobody cares that Lisa Murkowski didn’t vote for it.
Name the bill the “Republicans are insurrectionist traitors act” and then make unblinking eye contact with them as you vote for it.
In that case I guess they'll go back to passing a bigger bill unilaterally. Let's see what happens.

Meanwhile anyone who still needs in 2021 to be convinced the GOP are bad faith actors is probably a bad faith actor themselves, so I oppose the attempt.
People who can still ascribe these long-game strategy motives to Democrats every time they hit their own foot with a chainsaw ... I don't get you, I sort of pity you, but also I almost envy you. It must be nice to have that level of faith, however little the evidence supports it.
The problem with bipartisanship — beyond the fact that it wastes time — is it reestablishes the lie that you need permission from a conservative minority before exercising democratic power: no matter how obvious the proposal, no matter how pressing the need.
Weird but the GOP never "risk suburban voters" by passing party-line votes.

Almost as if people elected these "representatives" to make the laws they promised to make during a specific term and expect them to just get it done and don't really pay attention to the 3D chess.
People keep telling me "Twitter isn't real life" but then also turn around and expect me to believe the average voter is going to be outraged OUTRAGED if the Senate changed their procedural rules around the filibuster.

People. Want. Their. Lives. To. Get. Better.
I’ll never understand how “let’s once again try to work with obstructionists” is seen as the pragmatic realistic approach, while “we accept that obstructionists only want to obstruct so let’s find ways to circumvent them” is seen as unrealistic naiveté, when the opposite is true.
Oh no I would hate for Republicans to become obstructionist and violent, that would surely be our fault if they did.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with A.R. Moxon

A.R. Moxon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JuliusGoat

24 May
"What Trump voters think" should be reported, but it shouldn't matter.

Their beliefs and opinions should be covered like those of the members of any suicide cult. We should be told what the beliefs are. They shouldn't be lent credence or framed as valid drivers of policy. The New York Times | Opinio...
The New York Times is making me tap pretty hard on the sign this weekend.
And: it's no longer necessary to report on what Trump voters think. We KNOW what they think. We know we know we know we know, we never stop getting told what these people think.

When exactly do we insist they engage with what everybody else thinks?
Read 7 tweets
23 May
Adding: It's not that they used it and didn't ask for permission that makes them bad. It's that they used it for bad corrosive things.

It's OK when you win elections to use your power without asking permission. The elections were the permission. That's what elections are.
The other thing that makes Republicans bad is that increasingly they don't *win* elections, they just damage the mechanism of election until the election no longer reflects the will of the people ... which is the quality of elections that makes the permission they bestow valid.
When Democrats are in power, increasingly it means an *overwhelming* victory, so much that it overcomes the anti-democracy mechanisms Republicans have put into place.

When Republicans achieve power, increasingly they do so despite, not because of, the will of the people.
Read 8 tweets
22 May
CALIFORNIA SPLIT is, in my opinion, good. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
The final 30 minutes are perfection.
Read 4 tweets
22 May
“What Bouchard did” was rape a 14 year old who 6 years later committed suicide. All smiles for Brent! His kinda guy!
To be clear: a rapist of young girls is a selling point for mainstream Republicanism this point. That’s not hyperbole. That’s simply a clearly observable pattern. It’s an Abuse Party.
White conservative Christians have weaponized the concept of “forgiveness” to mean “a transactional status restoration between unrepentant abusers on one hand, and on the other unharmed third parties who have without consent appointed themselves proxies for victims.”
Read 7 tweets
21 May
Quoting a white supremacist claiming there is no white supremacy problem.
What a surprise, a conservative Christian husband, would you believe he’s into sports.
You either die a gyro or live long enough to become a christian

look people these are the jokes
Read 6 tweets
20 May
Andrew Sullivan may not agree with what white racists say, but he’ll defend with his life their right—and only their right, exclusively—to say it.

And also he agrees with what they say.
Like Andrew Sullivan, I don't want to see some voices elevated while I do want to see other voices elevated.

Unlike Andrew Sullivan, the voices I want elevated are diverse, vital, and challenging to existing hegemony, while the voices I don't want elevated are toxic and bigoted.
Also unlike Andrew Sullivan and the rest of these "anti-woke" "cancel culture" substack social injustice warriors, I'm honest about my position.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(