People celebrating @NewYorkStateAG's proposed legislation that supposedly makes it easier to prosecute cops, should remember James presented the case against the cops who killed Daniel Prude to a grand jury, but also called an expert who testified that the killing was justified. Image
In that case, AG James claimed that she presented the strongest possible case to the grand jury in an attempt to indict the police officers, but she called Dr. Gary Vilke as the state's expert witness and he concluded that the cops were not responsible for Mr. Prude's death.
He concluded that Mr. Prude died due to "excited delirium." This is a diagnosis that is not recognized by the American Medical Association or American Psychiatric Association and is used to justify police violence against Black and Brown people. brookings.edu/blog/how-we-ri…
That Dr. Vilke would testify this was was not a surprise. Gary Vilke has only ever testified for law enforcement and concluded that they acted lawfully. 9news.com/article/news/i…
If the attorney general had wanted to get an indictment in that case she would have gotten one.
Just as nearly any prosecutor who wants to get an indictment now in a police killing case can get one if they present a strong case to a grand jury. They choose not to do that.
Remember she had the video and was responsible for the investigation since April of last year, but the video was not released until October. 13wham.com/news/local/thi…
So her office was implicated in the cover up of the case as much as local officials.
This new legislation, like most criminal justice reform legislation, is really just theater. Smoke and mirrors. Murder is already illegal. Police who kill people can be prosecuted. Don't buy the hype.
Here are the transcripts. amsterdamnews.com/news/2021/apr/…
The top charge she presented was criminally negligent homicide. That's a class e felony with a minimum sentence of PROBATION and a maximum sentence of 4 years in prison.

whec.com/rochester-new-…
Presenting the strongest possible case to the grand jury would have been presenting a murder charge.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rebecca Kavanagh

Rebecca Kavanagh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrRJKavanagh

23 May
It's interesting the way people think when prosecutors are presenting cases against cops to a grand jury, they're meant to present all the evidence good and bad.

I promise you this is *not* what they do when they present against ordinary people. They try to get an indictment.
The only duty a prosecutor has is not to mislead a grand jury and to present what would be described as exculpatory evidence. For instance, if a defendant had a credible alibi a prosecutor would have to inform the grand jury.
But presenting a state witness who argues that the defendant was justified in killing someone, no. Absolutely not. Never ever.
Read 5 tweets
19 May
CW: Police violence

Today @AP published video that shows LA police killing Ronald Greene in May 2019.

Police told Mr. Greene's family he died in a car accident.

In fact, they choked, beat, kicked & tased him as they dragged him face-down along the road.apnews.com/article/us-new…
As in the case of Andrew Brown, the state refused to released bodycam footage of the murder, and only showed it to the family months after the killing.

It still has not been released, two years later. @AP obtained the video independently. apnews.com/article/john-b…
When police took Mr. Greene to the hospital after he died, they told the emergency room doctor he had been in a fight after the car accident, but the doctor found taser prongs still in his back. apnews.com/article/louisi…
Read 8 tweets
16 May
This is wild. Dude is regularly on CNN talking about how he has rejected the legacy of Robert E. Lee to become a symbol of racial reconciliation. Turns out it's all a grift.

washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/…
I mean dude is convincing. I heard him and thought, wow this is kinda cool. And this is his website. Image
When you do look at his website tho, the grift is kinda apparent - I thought he was just a pastor, turns out he's written three books. So there's that. Image
Read 4 tweets
15 May
Remember Trayford Pellerin, the young Black man who was shot and killed by Louisiana police, two days before Kenosha police shot Jacob Blake?

On Tuesday, a grand jury failed to indict the cops, despite the fact that they shot him 11 times in the back as he walked away from them. Image
DA Donald Landry says that he presented second degree murder charges to the grand jury, but that he feels their decision not to indict the officers was justified.

Which almost certainly means he charged the grand jury as to the defense of justification.
theadvertiser.com/story/news/202…
Grand jury proceedings are always secret. But the DA in this case has shown an extraordinary lack of transparency.

The names of the police officers have not been released. The body camera footage of the shooting has not been made public.

theadvertiser.com/story/news/202…
Read 8 tweets
13 May
In six days, Quintin Jones is scheduled to be executed by the state of Texas.

Quin was just 20 when he killed his great aunt while under the influence of drugs. The family have forgiven him and don't want him to be executed. They are asking Governor Greg Abbott for clemency.
Quin has been in prison for 21 years. "Through prayer, sobriety, reconciliation with his family, and longstanding correspondence with pen pals he has found a way to lead a meaningful life and even to enhance the lives of others."
nytimes.com/2021/05/10/opi…
Quin's clemency application details the shoddy legal representation he received. His lawyers missed key filing deadlines and failed to challenge the central arguments in the prosecution's case. chron.com/news/houston-t…
Read 9 tweets
11 May
Why does @ChrisCuomo always have the worst defense lawyers on his show? This lawyer has been disciplined for professional misconduct for stealing client funds, making sexually explicit remarks to prosecutors and disparaging his own clients.

Foxitis is just a ploy for attention.
Mr. Hurley has been accused of demanding sex from an employee, has sent sexually explicit correspondence to prosecutors, made anti-Semitic and racist remarks to prosecutors, exhibited bizarre and grandstanding behavior in court and his demeaned colleagues.
delawareonline.com/story/news/loc…
In the @CuomoPrimeTime clip, he says he is not just a good attorney, but a superb one, and an honest one.

A good journalist would confront the lawyer with some of his record of misconduct. They would also make it clear to their audience.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(