figure 1C, and:
"[...] post-vaccination neutralization titers were equal to or exceeded the titers found in the high responder convalescent group" medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
7/V
FYI:
Neutralizing antibodies bind to SARS-CoV-2 to prevent it from infecting cells.
Vaccines can not only increase them more initially without infection, but also increase them after infection.
Maybe he should spend more time honestly listening to criticism, as opposed:
- to running from it
- sub-tweeting his critics
- messing up more on COVID-19 vaccines for kids?
Saying 'infection is better than vaccination' is a standard trope of vaccine denialism, as is peddling anti-vaxxers' misleading/false tropes while claiming to be pro-vaccine.
Let's not fall for it.
"of 510 researchers who had published on SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19, 38% acknowledged harassment ranging from personal insults to threats of violence" journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jv…
Ridley shows how one can get away with being wrong on topic after topic, as long one states the paranoid ideological narrative many conspiracy theorists want to hear.
"[...] according to ERA5 [...].
The increase for the last thirty years, from 1995 to 2024, is 0.26 ± 0.05°C per decade." climate.copernicus.eu/climate-indica…
@grok @19joho @WSJopinion @mattwridley @grok Ridley predicted less than 0.5°C of warming.
"Matt Ridley's 2014 prediction that global warming from 1995 to 2025 would be about 0.5°C" x.com/grok/status/19…
@grok @19joho @WSJopinion @mattwridley Re: "The increase for the last thirty years, from 1995 to 2024, is 0.26 ± 0.05°C per decade" climate.copernicus.eu/climate-indica…
Matches the ~0.3°C/decade projection Ridley attributed to climate models