.....okay let's finish this fight. So problem with this one is the Shield is a Archie character and while DC published versions they don't own him.
This one at least HAS NUANCE, but it doesn't actually use a Golden age Grundy to show it. So......wow.
The thing about this one is that there is actually thing like characters at DC....Cinderblock is not one of them.
This one is BADLY misleading. So Artemis is a combination of characters in the YJ cartoon she's actually a bit based on Cissie King aka Arrowette, the original was a full supervillain with just a crossbow weapon.
Well First LENSMEN...second this is not Hal Jordan but Alan Scott's first year of publication date, the video has an inconsistent as fuck dating thing in comparing characters. You can look at my other posts for more examples. THIS IS GOING TO KEEP HAPPENING.
....why the fuck is Machineman here? He's a FUCKING ROBOT, not a cyborg like Deathlok...and Cyborg. There also all completely different concepts but at least Cyborg and Deathlok have a similar mecha mask thing.
Okay Clayface is a COMPLICATED example, sine the GOlden age version was just a serial killer who could change his face, while the ONE introduced in 1961 Matt Haggan had the clay monster gimmick but he's not that Similar to sandman honestly.
Brainiac back in the day was not very similar to Ultron, his original gimmick was BEING an ALIEN WHO SHRUNK CITIES. Modern versions have him be more computer like but the original and Ultron are VERY DIFFERENT.
Once again this one comes down to sharing a motif. Other then the Bee theme both orgs are VERY DIFFERENT in what they do and how they've been utilized over the decades.
Do I need to point out why this is bad? Like oh wow the idea of putting a team of major heroes together belongs to only one company.....like your not even going to say the Justice Society who did it first?......
THE GL CORP WAS CREATED IN THE 60'S MOTHERFUCKER THE 60'S! COME ONE JESUS HOW HOW.
Just to be fair some HAVE MERIT....some....other lead me down a dark path. Of stupidity.
Look...Dr Polaris is just a dude with Magnet powers, he is not Magneto and Doctor Diehard is at least a parody of mags.
You never heard of Jeeves have you? Like this is just a trope man.
Man these characters are so similar......so similar.......I mean one is a hot rod racing member of the FF and the other is Captain Atom with multiple personalities. TOTALLY THE SAME THING AND CLEARLY A RIP OFF.
Buck Rogers or Flash Gordon are apparently foreign concepts.
if you use magic, you rip off people. Also to point this out Zatana is the daughter of Zatara who was a character from the Golden Age so she does have a bit more history there.
I mean Gizmo doesn't even use those arms that much and is more known for a jetpack.
Tracer is a Sabertooth parody, but Mammoth is not really that similar, he''s more famous for really being into his sister but other wise is just a mook.
This one is SIMILAR POWERS but not exactly, for one ONCE AGAIN a publication date fuck up that is the FIRST star sapphire and not the iconic one, besides that Moonstone is in PERFECT control of her action and not controlled by her stone.
I wow. So this one is a fuck up. Firestar was ACTUALLY created to replace the Human Torch on Spider-man and his amazing friends and Starfire....is an alien princess who doesn't have fire powers really. I mean...yeah.
Man....devil motifs are apparently exclusive to marvel.
THIS ONE IS SUPER SPECIAL. Gorrilaman was actually an anthology story character, he was meant to be a one in done horror story, while Grodd was created in the DC comics silver age gorillar villain boom. Not similar at all in anyway even backstory.
....this is bad but also why didn't he pick BETTER FUCKING art for Black Lightning. He has a 90's comic with good art.
THEY HAVE A CLOCK ON THEIR CHEST I GUESS?....Okay in all seriousness, Hourman is a legacy hero and son of the original 1940's Hourman. Hourman actually debuted in 1940.
and LAST OF THESE I THINK WORTH TALKING ABOUT. If you look up these characters besides sonics nothing similar besides maybe Irish ancestry and even then it's a stretch. This video is one of the least informed I've seen on this subject and god it was a pain seeing this.
anyway if I could go back in time I would make this a whole thread but oh well if you have not seen me talk about the others here you go
The idea of a punk settling down into a more normal looking dude is actually a very real thing.
Like if you know people
*they probably met because of either a mutual friend or she decided to date him as a lark
*they find it works but he has to tone down shit because of her other friends or family
*finally propose
*you have a kid time to look semi respectable
So this is one of the most INFAMOUS costumes of all time, but like many things we make fun of there is a STORY behind it, and today I will tell you that story.
Back during the 90's Tom Delfalco and artist Paul Ryan came in on FF, talking to editor Ralph Machio they laid out a long term idea of the FF that the run would try to subvert readers expectations and bunch of it was going to be laid on Sue Storm.
the idea was to help SHAKE up the dynamics of the team, and Sue would be used in a couple ways the long term plan was she was GOING to become the leader of the FF while Reed was "dead" for a long time and he would come back and that would CAUSE conflict.
So finished Picard some thoughts.
The good
-solid plot at least, it's very much written as a long star trek movie that happens to be 10 hours instead of 2 but it's paced well
-new characters are good
-It feels like it draws on star trek history
-Jack Crusher is honestly a good lead and who ever thought of making him basically Kirk, good job that's a good way to contrast Picard.
-the build up to the reunion is well handled and Data new's life is handled very well, the last scene with lorre 10/10.
bad
-the production still reyling on that JJ lens flare style is eh, and it really is more annoying then dynamic but not the worst
-it not completely stand alone from the first two seasons but it was easy to follow at least and it's not hard to get into.
I'm not a fan of it but not because of the changed ending overall, it's more the tone of it, to me Watchmen is a story of uncertainty. Your kind of supposed to question who is right and wrong.
Like the ending bit for me is not getting rid of the squid, the BIG is Nite Owl beating up Ozy for leading to Rorshaque's death feel cheap to me to give the audience something because the MOVIE really plays him up as more a pure bad guy.
to me with Watchmen the questions should be is Rorschach right? Is Ozy right? Is Nite Owl right? is Doc right? and the movie kind of just slots them into Ozy evil the rest not pure heoric but better then Ozy
Sigh, the reason for the prevalence is simply because Superman is the first superhero, he more or less and created the genre as we know today for better or worse, so his image is subverted because for many decades it was the standard Symbol of the whole genre
Like Superman has existed since 1938 and had his ups and downs depending on the year and decade. The truth is and this is a fact he just hasn’t had a big movie that most people like because that seems to be the way success in media is now, you have to have a good movie
Dc isn’t as protective of Superman like you say if he was then his portrayal in dark knight returns would not exist. Hell in my lifetime 4 redos of his origins existed
Hello I’m exalted_speed and I need to hear your pitch for an Archie movie right now. Whoever has the best one will get green lit and win two Oscar’s. Now give me your Archie pitches!