Suffice to say, the US intelligence community doesn’t know much at all, there’s a gap, they weren’t watching these labs. That doesn’t mean the lab leak theory is any less plausible. It just means we need a new, independent investigation into the labs.
The question the intelligence community (and the Biden) administration should be able to answer is: what were the sick researchers working on? Was it bat coronaviruses that infect humans? That would be relevant to me. Also, where are they now? Are they OK?
And why is the Biden administration leaving it to tiny leaks from the intelligence community, which only sow confusion. It’s irresponsible. @SecBlinken and @jakejsullivan should declassify and release the Jan 15 statement underlying evidence now, in the interest of public health.
And guys, LISTEN. We can’t repeat the mistakes of Russia-gate where we overhype every “intelligence community officials say” snowflake. The Covid origin question is a YUGE US intelligence community failure. Their level of confidence in their own assessments are irrelevant.
The lab leak theory implicates the IC because, if it’s true, they TOTALLY MISSED IT. $80 billion per year and nobody was watching this network of Chinese labs working with the military on risky virus research. That’s the biggest intel scandal since 9/11.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"The U.S. government is thwarting congressional inquiries while passing the buck to the World Health Organization, which is a recipe for delay and probable failure. This neglect further endangers our national security and public health."
Of course everyone shares the “desire” to solve the covid origin question; that’s not the issue. The question is whether the Biden administration is actually going to do what it can to investigate. So far it seems the Biden team is all talk, no action.
Psaki said the Biden admin is "now hopeful the WHO can move into a more transparent Phase 2 investigation." Hope is not a strategy. The Biden administration is passing the buck. The WHO already failed.
Psaki repeatedly ignored the crucial question: At what point does the United States start its own origin investigation instead of calling for someone else to do it, which clearly isn't working?
How can Psaki say the families of the dead deserve answers and then say the United States is leaving it to the WHO to find those answers after 18 months of WHO mess and failure? This is the crucial disconnect of the Biden administration. If you care, take the lead. Now. Please.
If you are writing a piece defending yourself for being wrong for a year about the lab leak hypothesis by blaming everyone else except yourself for your own wrongness, you haven't learned a thing and you are just engaged in bullshit navel-gazing that literally nobody cares about.
I think a lot of science writers are racing to think "How can i position myself" and "How can I seem reasonable while changing my position" and "Aren't I great for eventually being objective after failing for a year." It's transparent and besides the point.
What all these science journalists won't admit is they got took by their best scientist sources, who misled them, on purpose, to the detriment of science, journalism and our public health. The scientists who got it right were the ones who had no conflicts of interest.
.@arora4people: “It seems like there is no intention to have an election because there’s only one candidate. So they are trying to bypass that and just renew his contract. But Guterres doesn’t deserve a second term.” washingtonpost.com/opinions/globa…
By rubber-stamping a second term for Guterres, the U.N. would be bypassing a free and fair democratic process and undermining its own supposed commitment to promote gender equality and youth inclusiveness. washingtonpost.com/opinions/globa…
Rand Paul and Fauci are arguing over whether the bat coronavirus research in Wuhan was "gain of function" according to the NIH definition. That's somewhat besides the point of whether the research is risky or not (it is).
Fauci: “I do not have any accounting of what the Chinese may have done and I am fully in favor of any further investigation of what went on in China.” Wow.
Fauci: "The NIH and NIAID categorically has not funded gain of function research to be conducted in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.” Paul points out that many scientists argue the research was gain-of-function even if the NIH didn't define it as such.
Today I got a call that showed up on my phone as coming from my wife, but the person on the other line was from actually from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency @CISAgov. This is the second time this has happened... 1/?
@CISAgov When I answered, "Sidney" said he was returning a missed call from my number. I asked him who he worked for and he said "Homeland Security." I asked him was it CISA (because this happened to me before) and he said "Yes." 2/?
@CISAgov Like the last time, "Sidney" didn't seem to know why he had received a missed call or why his return call showed up on my caller ID as my wife's phone number. He asked me who I was and I told him my name and that I was a reported for the Washington Post. He got nervous... 3/?