Imagine if they would've told us from the beginning something like this: "This virus from China, we're unsure of its origin and therefore pathology. Which means we need to throw everything we can at it until we have enough real-time data to know for sure."
And they used measured pleas on mitigation efforts that in the past had been ruled out and would explain why we were quarantining the healthy. Because maybe a synthetic respiratory virus was designed for asymptomatic spread, but we just don't know yet?
And therefore when they told us "we're all in this together" they actually meant it. That we would mobilize the home front against either a punitive accident or bio-weapon event. That they were learning about it as we were, in real-time.
And thus we needed a true private-public partnership. They would offer us real transparency, in exchange we would practice patience with the discovery process. That they treated us as citizens instead of subjects. Just imagine how things might've turned out differently?
Instead, they spoke with forked-tongue certainty about things they often didn't know, or people like me could empirically prove with data just weren't true. In fact, some of us got so good at pointing this out, we either got banned, shadow-banned, or our account traffic crushed.
We were told things were true with certainty that now they're admitting were not. We were told things weren't true with certainty that now they're admitting might very well be. We were told to just ignore real-time data, and follow their unsubstantiated claims of certainty.
We were told to ignore all other pre-established science and scientific precedents. For example, we watched "the science" on masks change overnight almost exactly a year ago, after decades to the contrary -- on cue with the narrative.
In short, we the people were treated with suspicion, while we were to give them the ruling class unconditional benefit of the doubt on every claim.
That is not a social compact. That is oligarchical tyranny.
And along the way we learned three important lessons that must never be forgotten:
1) Too many of our fellow Americans don't want to be Americans anymore. It's just too hard, or their indoctrination is just too strong. They were made to be ruled, and demand everyone else do the same.
2) A long list of people/institutions/entities never to be trusted again. And a much shorter list of those who smelled a rat from the beginning, and collectively amassed a data-driven resistance that is one of the main reasons the system in our country is in retreat now.
3) The truth and our Constitutional ideals still win. The system has all but declared our Constitution a dead letter, but when we live in defiance of that and instead in acknowledgement of our Constitution, that 5,000-year leap still scales tall shibboleths in a single bound.
The Spirit of the Age will run this playbook back on virtually everything from this time forward. Be vigilant! Neither fall for soft-headed conservative media personas that originally fell for this canard again. The Covid battle isn't over, either, but we're winning.
Keep close tabs on those who were your friends and those who weren't. Those who were honest when they were wrong and those who weren't. Those who are gaslighting you now, and those who aren't.
As Augustine once said, "There are many sheep without but many wolves within." Feed the sheep, and confront the wolves. Our very civilization is at stake.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Analysis of Kristi Noem's proposed changes and veto of the bill protecting women's sports -- and sanity -- in South Dakota from the Family Policy Alliance:
"Her promised veto removes the enforcement mechanism. It leaves no avenue for a parent or female athlete to take legal action against a liberal school district that decides to ignore the law."
"Second, it removes college sports – a giant omission – because of the threat of an NCAA lawsuit and her fear of losing out on hosting conference championships."
Thread on what's happening here with mental illness as public policy and Kristi Noem. @seanmdav previously described it as "dissembling" and that is perfect term.
Noem, who made clear and definitive statements when pushing back on Covid fascism for the past year, suddenly has a catechesis to offer on why she refused to sign a very simple bill. A 22-tweet thread. You read that right -- 22 tweet thread!
Her thread is over 400 words! Or more than 5 times the total words found in the First and Second Amendments COMBINED. And all to explain away her dissembling on the first fundamental fact stated about every human being ever: "it's a boy/girl."
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them
A decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal
That they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed
Didn't know what a Lin Wood was before the GA runoff, and I don't care now. He may well be somewhere between grifter/nutter for all I know. But I know this, Team GOP is setting him up as their Russian Collusion excuse if they lose Tuesday. As opposed to the GOP's own betrayals.
It also shows contempt for their own base that Team GOP, and its whore/proxies in "conservative media," really think it's plausible that whatever the Hell a Lin Wood is could just instantly manipulate their own voters against their own will.
Let's assume Lin Wood is a grifter/nutter for the sake of argument, he could only capitalize on these wild speculations and empty promises if indeed the base has been abused so much by Team GOP there's a market for it.
Only 2 Supreme Court justices, Thomas and Alito (neither appointed by Trump), apparently have any intellectual curiosity about the integrity of election law. The longest-tenured conservatives on the bench were willing to hear the Texas case, the rest just can’t be bothered.
Some patriots may argue this violated jurisdictional authority. In decent times that would surely matter. These sadly are not such times, and those shredding our Constitution and defecating on our way of life as we speak will laugh, while continuing their Great Reset unopposed.
So we will continue honoring details of a process that no longer exists, while the Spirit of the Age proceeds to the culmination of its Long March through the Institutions with reckless abandon.
When you get to define what voter fraud is, you can't commit it. When you get to define what a baby is, you can't kill it. When you get to define what the news is, you can't fake it. And then you get tenured to indoctrinate a generation.
For decades we have done NOTHING post-election to push back on their long march through the institutions. In fact, we were told by Team GOP/Fox News we couldn't because the blowback would be bad and we'd lose elections.
This reduced winning elections to mere defensive maneuvers. A staving off of the inevitable. Elections became mass, colossal undertakings for the purpose of kicking the can down the road. Most of their policies remained or even advanced.