Tomasz Wlostowski Profile picture
May 25, 2021 17 tweets 5 min read Read on X
I am hearing a lot of doubts whether EU and the West have any economic pressure over Belarus.

Here are some quick & obvious targets for trade sanctions. (thread)
By hitting:
(1) oil & fuels
(2) iron, steel, metallurgy
(3) chemicals & fertilizers
the West would be hitting about a third of BLR trade. /2
First, fuel, oil & minerals. Almost 7 bln USD in exports look sanctionable. Key player is Ukraine, which may not be able to join due to Kyiv's reliance on some energy-related imports from BLR. But below some examples. /3
Refined petroluem - Belarus' NUMBER 1 EXPORTS. Goes almost exlusively to the West _ Ukraine. Over 5 bln USD in exports. Even if Ukraine doesn't join, very painful to BLR. /4
Crude petroleum - over 700 mln USD in exports. All of them to Germany. /5
Coal tar oil - over 300 mln USD in exports, all to EU. /6
Coal briquets - 250 mln USD in exports, entirely Ukraine & Poland. /7
Petroleum gas - 180 mln USD. Key role of Ukraine again. /8
Second, big group - chemicals. Over 4 bln USD in potentially sanctionable exports. /9
Potassic fertilizers - BLR second biggest export - almost 3 bln USD in global exports, of which abt 20% goes to the West. /10
Compound fertilizers - almost all of the 320 mln USD in exports go to the West + Ukraine. Incidentally, Ukrainian producers would be happy to get rid of these imports as they just had a trade defence case against them. /11
Nitrogen fertilizers - almost 90% of these 200 mln USD exports go to the West. /12
Fertilizers are important, because none of them are going to Russia, which is a big competitor of the Belarus industry. So without Western markets, Belarusian exports have nowhere to go. /13
Another example - antiknock - almost a quarter of these go to the West. /14
Finally, the third group: the steel & metals sector. Mostly state-owned. Some examples of top BLR global steel exports below, with West's share of imports marked. Over 1 bln USD is in sanctionable product groups (i.e., where West's share is significant). /15
More steel & metals products. /16
Of course, this is rudimentary data. No ambition to be complete. In energy & fuel, Ukraine may not join for some categories. There may be other reasons why other groups are difficult. But overall, its clear the West has ability to deliver massive pain to BLR economy. /END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tomasz Wlostowski

Tomasz Wlostowski Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TomWlost

Oct 15, 2023
I see a lot of bad Brussels takes on the likely outcome of Polish parliamentary elections , so let me share a few points.
1/ We are unlikely to have a sworn in government until late November or more likely, December. So the new government starts really governing in the begining of the next year.
2/ The primary focus of the new government is likely to be internal Polish affairs. The only major exception is releasing EU funds. But those, to be released, will probably require domestic law changes (though Tusk claims he can release them "within a day"). We'll see.
Read 8 tweets
May 9, 2023
Jednomyślność - mimo niewątpliwej zalety gwarantowania każdemu Państwu możliwość zablokowania inicjatyw dla niego złe - ma też dwie duże wady, z których o jednej mało (lub w ogóle) się u nas mówi.
Mianowicie w związku z tym, że wiele kompetencji jest już obecnie w rękach UE, wiele państw po prostu nie może sobie regulować na własnym podwórku, bo kompetencje te są w ręku UE.
Ale wymóg jednomyślność z kolei stanowiłby, że nawet na poziomie UE nie można by takiej regulacji uchwalić bez zgody wszystkich. Więc np. Niemcy czy Francja nie mogłby wymusić na UE uchwalenia czegoś czego chcą u siebie, bo np. Cypr czy Malta by to blokowały.
Read 6 tweets
May 9, 2023
So.... EU discussions on 11th EU sanctions package on Russia are seriously starting. ⚡

What's on the table?

It's all confidential and hush-hush 😶, so just a few teasers. (thread)

1/23
First, proposed listings of 72 new individuals (military, deportation of children, propagandists, others) and 29 entities (mainly defense 🚀, encryption 💻, propaganda 📺, banks 🏦).

If adopted, the totals are up to 1571 persons & 241 entities.

2/23
Second, a new ground for listing (i.e., subjecting to an asset freeze) for certain persons and entities involved in Russian IT sector). There is more here, but keeping it confidential. 🕵️

3/23
Read 23 tweets
Feb 5, 2023
A short thread on the occasion of the review of the crude oil price cap in the EU Russia sanctions.
As most of you know, on Dec. 5, 2022, crude oil price cap went into effect at 60 USD per barrel. The cap had first been discussed & somewhat agreed within G7 (aka "Price Cap Coalition"), then unexpectedly had to be renegotiated after some EU states forced it down to 60 USD.
It was a real nail-biter, as discussions kept dragging for some time and the final level was published into law only on Dec. 3, 2022, so less than 2 days before going into effect.
Read 16 tweets
Feb 5, 2023
Ha ha ha!

The EU could have protected its domestic solar panel industry in the 2010s, but instead gave in to the free traders and green import lobby. In effect, Chinese imports destroyed EU PV industry completely.
For those that have short memory: late in 2012, the EU initiated an antidumping and antisubsidy action against Chinese PV panel, solar cell and wafer imports, to protect the EU industry from getting wiped out by Chinese imports.
However, the Chinese govt funded a massive campaign to kill it. PV importers, installers, green NGOs lined up to protect China. As did a number of "free trading" MS (mostly Nordics).
Read 5 tweets
Dec 14, 2022
The (lack of realistic) debate about excluding Russian #fertilizers from sanctions shows how the West is still susceptible to Russian propaganda. As the 9th #sanctions package is getting bogged down in a stalemate, it's worth to unpack is to realize what is actually going on. 🧵
As news outlets report, a number of major Western EU countries, including Germany, France and Belgium (and some others) are blocking the adoption of the 9th sanctions package with their request to create an exemption for transactions involving agriculture and fertilizers.
By way of background, EU sanctions do not, per se, block imports of Russian fertilizers into the EU. Except for potash and some multi-nutrient fertilizers (so-called NPKs), which are subject to a quota 👇, all other fertilizers can be imported into the EU.
Read 72 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(