Look, I'm angry, so I am just going to say it:

I really, really wish that non-Jews would immediately cease trying to define Jewish identity on here. It's transgressive and a basic violation of any commitment to antiracist and anti-oppressive praxis.

1/
Jewish identity, like many other social identities, is extraordinarily complex. Jewish people who live it often passionately disagree with each other on identity. If you don't live it, the odds that you're going to get anywhere close to the mark are vanishingly small.

2/
The odds that you are going to screw it up and perpetuate one of the most vicious and enduring racisms on the planet is a heckuva lot higher than you think.

3/
It's mind-boggling to me that so many people on here seem completely comfortable goysplaining the complexities of Jewish identity. And, by the way? Trotting out token members of the group who happen to share the speaker's political commitments +

4/
While ignoring majorities of said community who do not is an old trick and is equally transgressive and counter to antiracist praxis. It's bananaspants violent to listen only to a few Jews who tell speakers what they want to hear.

(see @schraubd: dsadevil.blogspot.com/2016/04/the-ma…)

5/
There's the underlying epistemic arrogance, too. What would possibly make non-Jews believe themselves to be reliable narrators of Jewish identity and experience? What histories are they tracking that suggest this confidence is warranted???

6/
All of the above goes double, triple for discerning antisemitism. Do not, do NOT pretense to tell Jews what is and what is not antisemitic. This too is entirely fundamental antiracist praxis. We will decide. And yes, we will disagree with each other, too.

7/
That is our privilege and our business. If I read one more tweet or op-ed from a non-Jewish person purporting to explain to me the history of my peoples and what it must mean for me today, I will have a gatdang infarction.

8/
Sit down. Shut up. And listen.

Know what you do not know.

Which, by the looks of things on here recently, is an awful lot.

#AllOfTheVaguetweeting #IWillNotBeSilent

9/9

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Daniel Goldberg

Daniel Goldberg Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @prof_goldberg

20 Dec 20
I would just like to point out that Nate Silver's nonsense today didn't merely insult public health scientists, epidemiologists, and officials.

It also insulted public health ethicists, implying that it takes no special expertise or training to unpack and offer guidance

1/
On the deep and fraught complexities in vaccine allocation and prioritization.

I have noted in @AMJPublicHealth that public health ethics is fundamentally about priority-setting:

ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.210…

Some of us have spent years working on exactly these kinds of probs.

2/
@AMJPublicHealth The idea that you can just barge into the subject with no training in either public health or applied ethics, wave a gatdang magic wand, and "solve" all of these problems is so absurd I've been wanting to #Hulksmash all day

3/
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(