I'm going to write a longer column on this but I think that the people reassuring each other that the urban crime spike is only homicide, while other violent crime fell last year, should not assume that those trends will keep diverging.
It's hard to assault/rob/rape someone who is home in their living room behind a locked door, rather than out on the street or in a bar or a parking lot where you can find them.
If the homicide spike was an anomalous reaction to the emotional and economic pressures of the pandemic, then homicide will fall back towards other crimes. But if homicide was driven by depolicing, and that continues into reopening, then likely other crime will rise instead.
I don't know which is the case, but "this is just some isolated gang wars" (that happened to occur in 30 cities simultaneously) is not the most likely explanation.
Also, nota bene, a huge amount of crime is driven by drinking, so as bars reopen ...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Megan McArdle

Megan McArdle Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @asymmetricinfo

18 May
It was reasonable to think that an explanation which sounded like a movie plot was less likely than the usual way we get new viruses, from animals

The problem is, people went full-frontal jerk about it, treating it as the equivalent of "the freemasons are poisoning the wells"
I mean, it would be surprising, but ... when outbreak is right next to a virology lab that studies these very viruses, "sheer coincidence" actually seems less intuitively plausible than lab leak. Folks insisted that was not merely wrong, but obviously risible, based on...what?
Best I can tell, based on "The World Health Organization said so". You mean, the same WHO that told us they had no evidence that human-to-human transmission was occurring, at the same time China was locking a city of 10 million people into their homes? WTAH?
Read 7 tweets
12 Apr
To me the biggest question about Haidt's (very important and impressive work) has always been whether the left's clustering on the "fairness" and "care/harm" axes tells you how they're actually making moral judgements, or how they feel they have to describe their moral judgments.
For example, Haidt asks respondents whether it's okay for someone to have sex with their frozen chicken, then cook and eating it. WEIRD lefties and libertarians say they have no problem with this. I believe they believe this.
But I think most of them would actually be reluctant to come over for a nice chicken dinner.
Read 4 tweets
12 Mar
Hello, internet, it is I, lucky wife of @petersuderman, the best amateur bartender in America, and the author of the best at-home cocktail newsletter: cocktailswithsuderman.substack.com. I also happen to have a mostly dormant food blog:cookerymonster.com. And we have a nice surprise!
@petersuderman Tonight, for your amusement, we will be on Clubhouse discussing food and drink, how to turn a picky eater into an omnivore, and more! Including a SPECIAL SNEAK PREVIEW of the 100% ORIGINAL St. Patrick's Day cocktail he has concocted for his readers.

Starting 8:30 PM sharp!
I don't want to give too much away, but there may also be a special guest bullmastiff!
Read 4 tweets
11 Mar
I've had exactly one interaction with Glenn Greenwald online--we quarreled--and pretty sure Matt Taibbi still thinks of me as an avatar of political evil, but they're both exceptionally talented and on this issue, correct: stop equating criticism with harassment.
Obviously, don't harass people! Mobbing people online is horrible and I oppose it, as I'm sure Messrs Taibbi and Greenwald also do. But no reputable journalist accepts the idea that they shouldn't criticize someone because some jerk might read the criticism and harass the target
I mean, *maybe* this is an argument against picking out randos from the middle of nowhere and "exposing" their horrible views to an audience that wouldn't know who they were but for your exposure.
Read 7 tweets
10 Feb
Castro is making the correct point: the question of whether Trump's words legally constituted incitement to riot is a red herring. Trump's biggest crime is having convinced his followers that the election was being stolen, something that was itself culpable, and ended in violence
It is not a legal crime to knowingly and falsely claim that an election was stolen, nor should it be. But the qualifications for higher office are higher than "was it a legal crime".
Trump has demonstrated in the most vivid possible way that he will never put the Republic, or even his followers, ahead of his own welfare. He fed those deluded people the lies that eventually led them to attack Congress. We cannot have a president who would do that.
Read 4 tweets
7 Feb
I obviously cannot judge the accuracy of these results, but they are plausible. Retweeting because opponents of restrictions tend to talk about suicides rising from distancing like they are a fact, even though there's no good data.
It's a perfectly reasonable hypothesis, but your intuition that it must be so does not mean it *is* so. Nor does the person you know who has become despondent; every year, some people become despondent.
It's natural to assume that the stresses of social distancing must be contributing, but it's also natural to assume that the vaccination your kid got three weeks before they started to manifest autistic behaviors must have caused the autism. It might be coincidence.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(