"They are not here to help you figure out what you believe. You are a hopelessly irrational consumer. They are here, rather, to tell you what to think.

There is no attempt to distinguish between the journalistic and the editorial. It all blurs together as “analysis”."
"Thus for Klein, the job of experts is not to give the public raw information, so that it can come to its own conclusions.

The job of experts is to process the information themselves, and tell the public what it ought to have concluded."

currentaffairs.org/2016/11/explai…
"This means...Vox inherently practices a crude and cruel form of rhetorical dishonesty: it treats matters of profound complexity as if they are able to be settled through mere expertise. If anyone disagrees with what [Vox] have concluded, they must be dumb, delusional, or both."
"People have good reason for not trusting fact-checkers and wonks.

That is because they lie.

And they torment people with those lies, by portraying disagreement as an irrational refusal to acknowledge objective empirical truth."
"The Vox model is premised on the idea that people shouldn’t think for themselves, that the important parts of political thought and decision-making should be outsourced to experts."
"Inevitably, these experts will produce solutions nobody likes, because the moment one is convinced that all opposition must be founded in ignorance, one will always be right no matter how many people are hurt or how many people complain."
"Vox’s difficulty at getting the facts right emerges from its confidence in the wisdom of 22-year-old [Washington] D.C. clickbait-churners.

It is “an explainer site by people who live way too much of their own lives outside reality.”"

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ruchir Sharma

Ruchir Sharma Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ruchirsharma_1

28 May
"Asaf Ali had described his old India House comrade Savarkar as someone who lived in the spirit of Mazzini and Shivaji, which was apt considering the fact that the Italian revolutionary and the great Maratha king were his political heroes."
"After Savarkar died, Hiren Mukherjee of the Communist Party of India stood up in the Lok Sabha to demand that parliament pay homage to [him].

Dange described him as a great anti-imperialist revolutionary while Indira Gandhi said Savarkar was a byword in daring and patriotism."
"His final release was widely welcomed. There was a lot of interest about his next move.

Two young socialist leaders, SM Joshi and Achyut Patwardhan, who would later become heroes of the 1942 movement, went to Ratnagiri to persuade Savarkar to join the Congress Socialist Party." Image
Read 9 tweets
9 May
"Declassified records from the Reagan presidential library show how the US government enlisted civilian agencies in psychological operations designed to exploit information as a way to manipulate the behavior of targeted foreign audiences..."

consortiumnews.com/2017/10/13/the…
"Agencies that were traditionally assigned to global development (USAID) or international information (USIA) were incorporated into U.S. strategies for peacetime psyops, a military technique for breaking the will of a wartime enemy by spreading lies, confusion and terror."
"Psyops play on the cultural weaknesses of a target population so they could be more easily controlled or defeated, but the Reagan administration was taking the concept outside the traditional bounds of warfare and applying psyops to any time the U.S. could claim some threat ..."
Read 11 tweets
28 Apr
Good quote!

"When a major foreign policy problem arises, US officials often feel the need to respond with some form of action, without deploying the military ...

They therefore tend to choose a measure between the use of force & doing nothing — economic or political sanctions."
As @dinesh2sinha spotted, a great reference to 'Yes, Minister',

"In practical terms we have the usual six options:

1. Do nothing.
2. Issue a statement deploring the action.
3. Lodge an official protest.
4. Cut off aid.
5. Break off diplomatic relations.
6. Declare war."
"1. If we do nothing, we implicitly agree.
2. If we issue a statement we'll just look foolish.
3: If we lodge a protest it will be ignored. 4: We can't cut off aid because we don't give them any.
5. If we break off diplomatic relations, we can't negotiate."
Read 4 tweets
24 Apr
That's our place in their world.

The US turned colonial countries into neo-colonial countries.

Under nominal native management, with the aesthetics of sovereignty.

But still a source of cheap raw materials and a market for expensive finished goods.

Never the other way around.
"The essence of neo-colonialism is that the State which is subject to it is, in theory, independent and has all the outward trappings of international sovereignty.

In reality, its economic system and thus its political policy is directed from outside."

- Kwame Nkrumah
"Neo-colonialism is also the worst form of imperialism.

For those who practise it, it means power without responsibility and for those who suffer from it, it means exploitation without redress.

[It] is an attempt to export the social conflicts of the capitalist countries."
Read 11 tweets
23 Apr
White House: "The US is in talks with Indian officials to find ways to help ."

Translation:

"We are blackmailing India by withholding raw materials during a crisis, until they give up and buy the finished product at the full price instead. Better margins for our pharma donors."
Always remember,

1. The US is not a normal state, it is a commercial entity which acquired an army and navy, thanks to its system of legalised corruption, "lobbying".

2. US "allies" and "partners" are expected to become captive markets, in exchange for the illusion of security.
3. "The strong do what they can, the weak suffer what they must." - Thucydides

4. True soft power is when a state can make the institutions of other countries act as extensions of its own national interests, enthusiastically and out of their own "free will".
Read 6 tweets
13 Apr
Absolutely, स्वतंत्रता is meaningless without स्वराज्य. स्वराज्य is meaningless without स्वाभिमान.

Without these, we stayed a semi-colony, prioritising foreign approval and acceptance over the economic, social, spiritual, moral, political revival of a traumatised civilisation.
The post-colonial elite were rewarded by the British for their role as a "managed opposition", inheriting the sadistic tools of the Raj.

Creating a patronage-based state - renting feudal satraps, journalists, academics, to protect their power from the aspirations of the people.
Without massive constitutional, administrative, judicial, police, and educational reforms, we will remain a semi-feudal society and semi-colonial polity.

Sleepwalking into another partition, civil war, and Balkanisation that others have planned, regardless of who wins elections.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(