(Thread) Demagogues and Fascism
@AshaRangappa_’s tweet made me realize that I never did a Twitter Book Report on @jenmercieca’s book.
So here it is.
All screenshots from Mercieca’ Demagogue for President
@AshaRangappa_’s tweet made me realize that I never did a Twitter Book Report on @jenmercieca’s book.
So here it is.
All screenshots from Mercieca’ Demagogue for President
https://twitter.com/AshaRangappa_/status/1396464685705142272
1/ @jenmercieca takes a deep dive into Trump’s rhetorical strategies.
Looking at these is helpful because we see other Republicans trying to imitate him, but without his skill in deploying these tactics.
The problem didn't end when Trump left the White House.
Looking at these is helpful because we see other Republicans trying to imitate him, but without his skill in deploying these tactics.
The problem didn't end when Trump left the White House.
2/ Also it seems that a bunch of Republicans are trying hard to be another (or the next) Trump by copying these strategies.
@jenmercieca presents Trump as a master con artist. His gaffes weren't gaffes. They were deliberate and masterful uses of aggressive debate tricks.
@jenmercieca presents Trump as a master con artist. His gaffes weren't gaffes. They were deliberate and masterful uses of aggressive debate tricks.
3/ Here she explains her use of the word "genius" in the title.
Basically, he's a master at manipulating people through standard rhetorical devices.
He ingenuously wields communication as a force in a way that makes it difficult to respond to him.
Basically, he's a master at manipulating people through standard rhetorical devices.
He ingenuously wields communication as a force in a way that makes it difficult to respond to him.
4/ Observation: Marjorie Taylor Green thinks that the way to imitate Trump is to be as vulgar as possible and try to create the maximum amount of outrage.
But it seems to me that she lacks Trump’s evil genius for manipulating people.
But it seems to me that she lacks Trump’s evil genius for manipulating people.
5/ Here we go. Device #1
🔹Appeal to the Crowd
Trump tells his supporters that they're smart enough to see through the manipulation of the “fake” media.
He tells them America’s problems are not their fault; they’re the victims of corrupt and inept politicians.
🔹Appeal to the Crowd
Trump tells his supporters that they're smart enough to see through the manipulation of the “fake” media.
He tells them America’s problems are not their fault; they’re the victims of corrupt and inept politicians.
6/ He conned his supporters into thinking he was a truth-teller by positioning his “lack of political correctness” as genuineness.
The more vulgar he was, the more his supporters liked and trusted him because rejecting “political correctness” made him appear authentic
The more vulgar he was, the more his supporters liked and trusted him because rejecting “political correctness” made him appear authentic
7/ Thus politically incorrect statements increased his supporters’ appreciation for him.
The impulse of his critics to mock him backfired by solidifying his position as a man of the people mocked by the establishment.
The impulse of his critics to mock him backfired by solidifying his position as a man of the people mocked by the establishment.
8/ His argument was annoyingly circular: “I’m right because so many people support me, and people support me because I’m right.”
Device #2 🔹 Ad hominem: Trump attacks his opponents' character (“liddle” Marco)
(I won’t go through all the devices.)
Device #2 🔹 Ad hominem: Trump attacks his opponents' character (“liddle” Marco)
(I won’t go through all the devices.)
9/ Ad hominem prevents critical thinking by diverting attention away from the debated question.
It casts doubt on an opponent, and appeals to hypocrisy by trying to find a contradiction between what a person says and what he does.
It casts doubt on an opponent, and appeals to hypocrisy by trying to find a contradiction between what a person says and what he does.
10/ What psychologists call “projection” @jenmercieca calls “appeal to hypocrisy.” This is basically saying "my critics have no standing to critique me because they have done it [or worse] themselves."
When Trump projects he’s seeking to undermine others.
When Trump projects he’s seeking to undermine others.
11/ Basically Trump unleashed the ugly.
It’s worth noting that most people have the decency not to use or even consider these kinds of rhetorical strategies.
These techniques are aggressive, ugly, mean, and designed to destroy.
Normal people just don’t do it.
It’s worth noting that most people have the decency not to use or even consider these kinds of rhetorical strategies.
These techniques are aggressive, ugly, mean, and designed to destroy.
Normal people just don’t do it.
12/ Next rhetorical device:
🔹Paralipsis, saying something while claiming not to be saying it. For example:
This gives him deniability “I never said it” and lets him spread innuendo without accountability.
🔹Paralipsis, saying something while claiming not to be saying it. For example:
This gives him deniability “I never said it” and lets him spread innuendo without accountability.
13/ Trump’s followers feel like they’re in on his jokes.
They applaud his deliberate ambiguity, which they understand lets him escape accountability.
Here’s how a fan responded to Trump's disavowal of white supremacy:
They applaud his deliberate ambiguity, which they understand lets him escape accountability.
Here’s how a fan responded to Trump's disavowal of white supremacy:
14/ Other devices include
🔹Exceptionalism. “America is the greatest but our enemies within have weakened America. I alone can fix it.
🔹Reification (treating people as objects; dehumanizing them)
🔹Exceptionalism. “America is the greatest but our enemies within have weakened America. I alone can fix it.
🔹Reification (treating people as objects; dehumanizing them)
15/ It's easy to see the overlap between these rhetorical strategies and fascist tactics.
Some of the rhetorical devices @jenmercieca describes are designed to unify his supporters and increase the polarization between his supporters and everyone else.
Some of the rhetorical devices @jenmercieca describes are designed to unify his supporters and increase the polarization between his supporters and everyone else.
16/ @jasonintrator describes fascist tactics as creating an “us v. Them” politics.
Fascist dehumanize the “enemies” (reification)
No surprise! Fascist leaders are also masters at these techniques.
They also lack the moral compass that allows them to use these strategies.
Fascist dehumanize the “enemies” (reification)
No surprise! Fascist leaders are also masters at these techniques.
They also lack the moral compass that allows them to use these strategies.
17/ Fascist leaders create spectacle. (See @TimothyDSnyder)
These rhetorical strategies do just that.
Fascist leaders promise to “drain the swamp.”
These rhetorical strategies do just that.
Fascist leaders promise to “drain the swamp.”
18/ Educating the people to recognize these tactics will help, but as @jenmercieca points out, these rhetorical devices are specifically designed to prevent people from using critical judgment.
This is exactly what Trump is trying to pull with his defense to the charge that he incited the riot.
"I said 'fight like hell' but I didn't really mean fight like hell."
And then lnvitation to Hypocrisy when he said, "The very people accusing me also use the word 'fight.'"
"I said 'fight like hell' but I didn't really mean fight like hell."
And then lnvitation to Hypocrisy when he said, "The very people accusing me also use the word 'fight.'"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
