I listened to Gloria's debut podcast episode late this morning and I've thought about it all day long. My wife and I spoke about it on our walk. It has lingered. I will probably re-listen tonight and maybe again tomorrow. Let me share a bit of why here, in an appreciation thread.
First, the sheer moral significance of Gloria debuting her show on the anniversary of the murder of George Floyd is enough to meditate on for a long time. The courage and statement and, of course, her "straight no chaser" opening monologue that simply starts THERE.
We really need to stop and appreciate what it means for Gloria to choose this day, of all days, to launch her new show and to not simply allow it to be an allusion or possible coincidence, but to name it and own it in all of its tragic moral reality.
I am not making a big deal out of something minor here. After the monologue that names this date and occasion, the interview to follow is with Fr. Erich Rutten, a priest from a Black Catholic parish in St. Paul, MN, reflecting on his experience of this event from the field.
The entire first episode to Gloria's first solo venture in Catholic media with full and total control and freedom is released intentionally on a day of great Black sorrow to mark and honor and also work through that trauma. Folks: This is not child's play or trite triumphalism.
Add to this the conditions that contributed to Gloria's loss of her show on EWTN, and this debut is a triumph without triumphalism. Gloria has kept her word to never stop speaking the truth! She is not trying to sugar coat that truth, even as she admits her own need for healing.
The courage it takes to do this simple and direct and unvarnished act of defiance of those who lied and tried to cancel and diminish her without rancor or pettiness is just mind-blowing to me. It is a singular watershed moment in the history of Catholic media in the USA.
This is a bigger moment, for me personally but also for the American Church, than Sheen, M. Angelica, and Nehaus all put together. Where it goes and what comes of it remains to be seen but we should not let bad ecclesial news cloud or dampen that something great happened today.
How many times in the history of the American Church has a Black Catholic woman been so systematically silenced and marginalized in such an obvious and sly yet public way and, within less than a year, risen up, punctuating that rise on the very occasion that began the conflict?
Gloria is too humble (and too good at what she is doing) to explicitly note that her debut is an emphatic, righteous rebuke of those who tried to rob her of her singular witness on behalf of the most invisible and disrespected social group within the US Catholic Church.
Brothers and sisters: When goodness triumphs over evil we have to see it and thank God for it and recognize that the mighty will be cast down and the powerful will always, always lose. And even in this victory, Gloria reminds us of the work to be done. Of the wounds and trauma.
This is a bluesy victory, like Christ's wounded resurrected body and Gloria doesn't try to dull the pain or anesthetize it in the Chauvin verdict, reminding us that the sentencing remains to be seen and above all reminding us of the racism that it brought to light in the Church.
This balance between the magnitude of her debut's moment and its sober and challenging message is the real kind of nuance you find in love and suffering and things of moral consequence. And she did it all by just being herself, talking about the things she cares about.
Having been radicalized by the news of Guadalupe Radio Network's "suspension" of her show in the midst of my attempt to awaken and process and fight in the wake of the killing of Floyd, her debut episode today felt bigger to me than the trial outcome, as key as it obviously was.
There is NOTHING, nothing like this on offer in a major outlet in English-speaking Catholic media today. From the triumphalisms of Kelly and Barron, to the cynicism we all know of from the crazies, and their subtle alignment against "wokeness," Gloria is our voice in the desert.
There's more, but for now let me end by reiterating that Gloria's debut speaks directly to the heart through her own heart, on a chosen and named date that reminds us of the perpetuation of anti-Black white supremacy in America, exhorting us to repent and believe in the Gospel.
Thank God for my sister Gloria, bless and keep her and lift her up since the truth she speaks lifts so many who have no one else like her to reliably and visibly and vocally offer words of consolation and conviction. Amen.
Now, go and LISTEN and subscribe to her podcast!
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sam Rocha

Sam Rocha Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SamRochadotcom

26 May
It makes conservative Catholics in the US extremely angry that their ideological foils (which hilariously includes the Pope!) never teach or promote overt theological errors while they, the great orthodox and faithful ones, do it on the daily and even rely upon it to survive.
No one is beyond reproach. Everyone's ideas deserve scrutiny, but that is not the same as promoting heresy or directly challenging Church teaching. On that matter, I've never said a single word that is unorthodox or heretical in all my public work.
Same goes for someone like Fr. Martin whose work I do not know very well but whom they are obsessed with. A critic might say we are careful in bad faith, questioning our motivations, but even that merely highlights how absolutely and totally sloppy and messy they are.
Read 8 tweets
24 May
No big deal, but once again, whilst grilling, a stranger of a particular presenting identity, just *had* to confront me. In this case I was grilling next to the other public grill being used by a Spaniard and we were, naturally, speaking to one another in Spanish. This person...
...walked up to us (socially distanced) and asked "are you using BOTH grills?" I replied "Well, *I* am using this one here." The person realized they assumed we were a common "you" incorrectly and doubled down by exclaiming, "well, ugh, both of the other grills are not working!"
I'm not a maintenance person but I knew the person was wrong so I walked with them to another grill and started it. This made them even more angry and they complained that it did not work properly. I walked away. This bullshit gets old. It must be the 6th time here just grilling.
Read 5 tweets
25 Apr
In reply to @BishopBarron’s Angelus interview, shared on his Facebook page, repeating his well-known thoughts about contemporary social activism, I have posted the reply to follow. angelusnews.com/arts-culture/b…
@BishopBarron: You have said this same thing, in different ways and to different degrees, about this idiosyncratic usage of the term "woke," but you have yet to name anyone who is doing it.
You refer to philosophers by name as root ideologies but remain indirect in your disputes with contemporary voices you are critiquing, not to mention dismissive of these complex philosophical schools of thought (much more so than, for instance, Benedict XVI)...
Read 13 tweets
24 Apr
THREAD

I thank @Kinder_Cons for his astute comments on my recent remarks published by @brianfraga, and especially for his measured criticism. I want to reply with a small clarification, but I will first post the original post and the notes to follow, with my reply thereafter.
Here are my remarks contextualized by @brianfraga: patheos.com/blogs/onthecat…
Read 13 tweets
7 Apr
In less than a year, I have been on Catholic Answers debating Catholic socialism, Pints w/Aquinas and Crisis debating the 2020 US election, Fr. Leo Patalinghug’s podcast discussing his use of Twitter and antiracism, and dozens of hours on other podcasts on related topics. 1/2
I have no one blocked or muted (though I’m not against it in principle, with periodic jubilees) and have agreed to debate other right wing Catholics like Tim Gordon and AltPatrick who forfeited and blocked me. Now, who is the snowflake incapable of rational dialogue here? 2/2
PS: This excludes my published writing and public and private correspondence with my critics. I don’t need that extra part to show how absolutely bankrupt the conservative whining about cancel culture and a need for genuine debate is. I’m right here, and there are many of us.
Read 5 tweets
2 Mar
Barron's latest essay on Word on Fire's rejection of liberal "beige Catholicism" and trad "self-devouring Catholicism" is an overview of his primary critics and lays out what he considers his evangelical approach to be which he asserts as representative of the universal Church.
It is essentially a both sides stance, centering Word on Fire and, by implication, the Roman Catholic presentation of the Gospel as perfectly consistent across Barron's life and thought. The libs will be evangelized and the trads will be invited, not condemned.
The tone is self congratulatory and, interestingly, cites major sources of credibility but names no allies; it credits no one but Barron's books and essays except to say that his work speaks in the voice of Vatican II, the recent popes, and the Catechism of 92.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(