@nattyover 👋👋👋👋👋
What would you like to know, Natalie? Do you have any other objections outside of the single tweet you've pulled from a thread of 30ish tweets?
What would you like to know, Natalie? Do you have any other objections outside of the single tweet you've pulled from a thread of 30ish tweets?
@nattyover If you check the history books, you'll find that several science writers have covered this topic... theatlantic.com/science/archiv…
@nattyover ...and covered it...sciencenews.org/article/corona…
@nattyover ...and covered it... nationalgeographic.com/science/articl…
@nattyover ...and covered it. forbes.com/sites/startswi…
@nattyover Those glycosylation sites tell us that SARS2 was adapted in an immune system (aka it's another sign that it arose naturally)....
https://twitter.com/nattyover/status/1397606242688933897
@nattyover That takeaway can be gleaned with a cursory look at the papers, hence the screenshots. (It's also a point well known to some of the loudest voices in the lab leak contingent.)
@nattyover But in the context of the thread, those studies are just additional examples of research pointing toward natural origins -- that are being omitted by the lab leakers.
@nattyover On Marc: Maybe you should ask him? Or perhaps, we should wonder why are we asking him at all?
Yes, Marc is a respected epidemiologist. But we're talking about virology, and virologists are continuously pointing out the scientific flaws in his assertions
Yes, Marc is a respected epidemiologist. But we're talking about virology, and virologists are continuously pointing out the scientific flaws in his assertions
https://twitter.com/mlipsitch/status/1397370801339441154
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
