.@USATODAY published our client Chelsea Mitchell’s opinion about the unfairness she experienced being forced to compete against male athletes. But after backlash from the woke mob, editors unilaterally changed Chelsea’s words & called them “hurtful language.” 1/3 
What was the "hurtful language" that editors deleted from Chelsea's opinion piece three days after publication? The word "male." 2/3
USA Today violated its principles to appease the mob. This blatant censorship violates the trust we place in media to be honest brokers of public debate.
Chelsea’s experience & viewpoint matters. That’s why we’re posting her original piece here adflegal.org/blog/i-was-fas…. 3/3
Chelsea’s experience & viewpoint matters. That’s why we’re posting her original piece here adflegal.org/blog/i-was-fas…. 3/3
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
