@ipoliticsca Why is it that climate advocates don’t realize that a minority government is a weakened position to implement these measures?
Do these opinion writers not understand how legislation is made in Canada? Do they not understand the limits our constitution?
@ipoliticsca I don’t believe they do. Or if they do, they’re actively confusing those who don’t for political gain.
Provinces hold purview over natural resources in Canada.
The Supreme Court basically just ruled that the federal government has jurisdiction to reduce carbon outputs.
@ipoliticsca Until that SCOC decision, several premiers blocked any meaningful legislation because of ideological values contrary to climate change reality.
But the door is now open for feds to implement some of those policies and measures to stave off climate catastrophe.
@ipoliticsca At the same time, we have covid, economic depression and hostile conservatives blocking any legislation in the senate.
Which the election of a minority government ensured the chairman of many of the committees remained conservative or became conservative.
@ipoliticsca Not only does the executive branch have the responsibility to table and champion climate measures legislation in house committees, they now have an uphill battle to gain support in senate committees.
Which a majority government would have been positioned to do more effectively.
@ipoliticsca You want to know why it’s so difficult to get climate change legislation passed and enacted? Because we have opposition parties more concerned about obtaining political power than climate realities.
Both NDP and GPC advocated PR and vote your conscience.
@ipoliticsca I have no doubt both Singh and May knew exactly how legislation is tabled and moves through the house and senate with multiple people influencing the final text.
Both are lawyers and experienced politicians.
Both pursued their political ambitions over climate change.
@ipoliticsca And delivered a minority government where they could attempt to gain political sway over legislation.
Neither of course considering the vehement opposition from federal and provincial conservatives and about 35% of voting Canadians.
@ipoliticsca Let’s hope the next election doesn’t produce the same result. Because if it does, Canada’s ambitions of becoming a green power will be lost in the ambitious pursuit of power for power’s sake.
@ipoliticsca It would be helpful if opinion writers would at least examine this aspect before opining that we haven’t advanced much on the climate file.
We’ve advanced significantly since 2015. Despite the power ambitions of flakey opposition leaders seeking to feather their own crowns.
Alberta has a corrupt… no, a deeply corrupt govt, which is actively working to harm the most vulnerable and redistribute resources and wealth to those who already have wealth and corporations that pay-to-play.
But because this is so counterintuitive and grossly unorthodox to established democracies, few even have the required mental framing to recognize it.
This is the mindset of most Albertans. Stunned shock, disbelief & confusion.
The wave looks familiar, but the danger isn’t recognized until it’s too late. Our brains are not hardwired to recognize danger unless we are familiar with the anomalies to recognize.
Human beings are at a disadvantage to other herding species of social mammals.
A former paper boy and a former mailroom clerk are trying to embarrass the PM because they’ve never actually worked a real job with real problems.
This is why life experience and NOT just education, should be a requirement for public service.
If you’ve only spread rumours and disinformation to harm political opponents & raise funds to pay for you to spread rumours & disinformation, you don’t get it. But if you’ve ever had real life experience, you know the PM job is to address the emergency, not discuss the emergency.
Maybe PMMC is actually working with other global leaders? Trying to prevent WW3?
Working with others is one of PMMC’s strong skills.
It’s not Scheer’s nor PP’s, so maybe they don’t know. Scheer and PP have no idea what work is, having never had a real job in the real world.
That’s code for: Christian Nationalists refuse to take no for an answer when it comes to their demands to ignore science, disobey Canadian laws & reject indigenous people in meaningful participation and sharing of profits.
This is who voted for Smith. This is her support base.
These Albertans are inflamed from roughly 80 years of populist rhetoric that may have started out traditional conservative in 1935, but became more & more aligned with American libertarian indifference & individuality.
Alberta has been colonized by US Christian Nationalists.
Certainly the 7 Mountains Strategy has been at play for decades.
I know it sounds crazy & scares people to discuss religion. But this has little to do with religion. No one is asking anyone to change their beliefs except the saboteurs who want Canadians to lose faith in Canada.
Kate Harrison @KatlynHarrison you need to give your head a shake.
Trump is a madman and even if Canada chose to kiss ass, kowtow and buckle under, there is no guarantee Trump would remove tariffs.
Canada’s best option is to move quickly to diversify immediately.
Yes, this will be hard. Yes some people may suffer. But those who suffer loss of pension value are the same ones who allowed this to happen in the first place.
Who permitted our economy to be dependent upon US hegemony.
That would be conservatives when they signed NAFTA.
When are people going to realize Smith is a puppet leader who was installed to break up Canada?
What more needs to happen before Canadians stop asking questions or pointing out odd behaviour and just understand that she was always a fascist pretending to be a loyal Canadian?
Show me one example of Smith behaving loyal to Canada or even to Albertans as a whole (not just special interest group Christian Nationalists).
You can’t. Because it’s never occurred.
The difficulty people are having is a function of not possessing the intellectual frame required to recognize the deep and profound corruption which is occurring.
When you expect to see normal, that’s what your intellectual frame recognizes.