@ipoliticsca Why is it that climate advocates don’t realize that a minority government is a weakened position to implement these measures?
Do these opinion writers not understand how legislation is made in Canada? Do they not understand the limits our constitution?
@ipoliticsca I don’t believe they do. Or if they do, they’re actively confusing those who don’t for political gain.
Provinces hold purview over natural resources in Canada.
The Supreme Court basically just ruled that the federal government has jurisdiction to reduce carbon outputs.
@ipoliticsca Until that SCOC decision, several premiers blocked any meaningful legislation because of ideological values contrary to climate change reality.
But the door is now open for feds to implement some of those policies and measures to stave off climate catastrophe.
@ipoliticsca At the same time, we have covid, economic depression and hostile conservatives blocking any legislation in the senate.
Which the election of a minority government ensured the chairman of many of the committees remained conservative or became conservative.
@ipoliticsca Not only does the executive branch have the responsibility to table and champion climate measures legislation in house committees, they now have an uphill battle to gain support in senate committees.
Which a majority government would have been positioned to do more effectively.
@ipoliticsca You want to know why it’s so difficult to get climate change legislation passed and enacted? Because we have opposition parties more concerned about obtaining political power than climate realities.
Both NDP and GPC advocated PR and vote your conscience.
@ipoliticsca I have no doubt both Singh and May knew exactly how legislation is tabled and moves through the house and senate with multiple people influencing the final text.
Both are lawyers and experienced politicians.
Both pursued their political ambitions over climate change.
@ipoliticsca And delivered a minority government where they could attempt to gain political sway over legislation.
Neither of course considering the vehement opposition from federal and provincial conservatives and about 35% of voting Canadians.
@ipoliticsca Let’s hope the next election doesn’t produce the same result. Because if it does, Canada’s ambitions of becoming a green power will be lost in the ambitious pursuit of power for power’s sake.
@ipoliticsca It would be helpful if opinion writers would at least examine this aspect before opining that we haven’t advanced much on the climate file.
We’ve advanced significantly since 2015. Despite the power ambitions of flakey opposition leaders seeking to feather their own crowns.
I have seen a tendency to favour radical left progressives in her analysis. But she remains quite accurate nonetheless. Gilmore hasn’t misrepresented facts & truth, often going above and beyond to establish a common reality & truth.
We are being forced to judge her credibility.
Where is mistrust originating? I’ll take a stab at this.
Gilmore wasn’t fired from her Friday fact checking segment. The management at CTV decided the backlash from loyal viewers wasn’t worth losing viewers (money) to establish reality.
This is sabotage of Liberal candidates using identity politics to destroy reputations.
Anyone under the impression these two people are pro Canada? No.
They’re antiestablishment anarcho syndicalists seeking to facilitate the social collapse we see occurring in US right now.
This bullshit needs to be exposed!
It’s occurring on both ends of extreme politics.
Rebel News destroying an Edmonton candidate who had a great chance to oust Tim Uppal.
When you align these efforts side by side, they’re the same.
They’re exactly the same.
Demonstrating clearly that the accusation I’ve made so many times about far left activists is 💯 accurate. Radical progressive left are NOT trying to win, they’re demoralizing voters.
Smith has done much to undermine the Team Canada bargaining position.
She is not advocating for Alberta from the position of loyal patriot. She’s bargaining on behalf of Trump’s interests; O&G oligarch’s interests.
Your confusion is understandable, she was elected as premier.
But was she really?
She was installed as leader after the former leader was ousted by radicalized religious fundamentalists in UCP. Kenney left even though he won the leadership confidence vote, but only by a small margin.
This is someone who is trying to get people to not vote.
Do not buy their bogus arguments.
In case you think I’m overreacting…
These are people trying to demoralize voters who have indicated a preference for the liberal party because of Trump. Because it’s clear LPC and PMMC are in majority party territory.
So this narrative is targeting the soft voter support.
People who don’t typically vote Liberal but feel motivated by fear to lend PMMC support to prevent a calamity like US annexation.
Typically that would be NDP voters and centrist conservatives.
Trump & his international conspirators are seeking to create a minority government.
But sure, Oxford’s standards are so weak they gave Carney a PhD without vetting his dissertation and it’s only come to be recognized as problematic 30 years later by Canadian cons desperately seeking a compromising narrative with which to smear PMMC during a federal campaign.
That accusation seems reasonable to some people? 🤪🤔🤭
Who? People who don’t have post secondary degrees or didn’t finish high school? That’s not disrespect. I have no expectations that those who don’t value educational achievement would appreciate the significance of Oxford.