@ipoliticsca Why is it that climate advocates don’t realize that a minority government is a weakened position to implement these measures?
Do these opinion writers not understand how legislation is made in Canada? Do they not understand the limits our constitution?
@ipoliticsca I don’t believe they do. Or if they do, they’re actively confusing those who don’t for political gain.
Provinces hold purview over natural resources in Canada.
The Supreme Court basically just ruled that the federal government has jurisdiction to reduce carbon outputs.
@ipoliticsca Until that SCOC decision, several premiers blocked any meaningful legislation because of ideological values contrary to climate change reality.
But the door is now open for feds to implement some of those policies and measures to stave off climate catastrophe.
@ipoliticsca At the same time, we have covid, economic depression and hostile conservatives blocking any legislation in the senate.
Which the election of a minority government ensured the chairman of many of the committees remained conservative or became conservative.
@ipoliticsca Not only does the executive branch have the responsibility to table and champion climate measures legislation in house committees, they now have an uphill battle to gain support in senate committees.
Which a majority government would have been positioned to do more effectively.
@ipoliticsca You want to know why it’s so difficult to get climate change legislation passed and enacted? Because we have opposition parties more concerned about obtaining political power than climate realities.
Both NDP and GPC advocated PR and vote your conscience.
@ipoliticsca I have no doubt both Singh and May knew exactly how legislation is tabled and moves through the house and senate with multiple people influencing the final text.
Both are lawyers and experienced politicians.
Both pursued their political ambitions over climate change.
@ipoliticsca And delivered a minority government where they could attempt to gain political sway over legislation.
Neither of course considering the vehement opposition from federal and provincial conservatives and about 35% of voting Canadians.
@ipoliticsca Let’s hope the next election doesn’t produce the same result. Because if it does, Canada’s ambitions of becoming a green power will be lost in the ambitious pursuit of power for power’s sake.
@ipoliticsca It would be helpful if opinion writers would at least examine this aspect before opining that we haven’t advanced much on the climate file.
We’ve advanced significantly since 2015. Despite the power ambitions of flakey opposition leaders seeking to feather their own crowns.
Danielle Smith is not the mastermind of the Alberta separatism movement.
The fact Dennis Modry has bragged about $500M being made available to aid in separatist efforts should remove any doubt about where the threat is originating. It’s the US Trump Administration.
Another pipeline to the coast is a direct threat to the supply Canada provides, at a huge discount, to US refineries and US based O&G companies who moved their head offices south of the border when Kenney was still premier and Keystone XL was the priority.
Canadian energy independence and increased capacity to supply other foreign buyers puts Canadian sovereignty as the priority and removes control of the resource Alberta owns out of American hands and back into Canadian’s circle of influence.
There is every reason to ban religious belief from shaping medical practice.
When some random guy believes his faith is more relevant than trained medical physicians expertise in deciding whether a pregnancy needs to be terminated, at any week of gestation, that’s a problem.
This is not DIRECTLY about women’s health or rights. It’s about religious zealotry controlling the options available to women & physicians.
This is about imposing moral values of Christian zealots into the mainstream.
This man is overruling the medical system’s moral system.
For him, it’s not good enough that a highly educated expert physician who has years of medical training and practical experience is able to offer the option to terminate a pregnancy or not in consultation with the woman who is pregnant based on science & health concerns.
This isn’t just whining. It’s Christian nationalists laying the groundwork for theocratic government.
Charlie Kirk is a martyr to evangelical Christo-fascists in the US and now this Alberta online influencer is touting his belief in Kirk’s brand of Christianity.
The public asks why Poilievre is an unrepentant bigot and brute leader.
This is why. The people voting for CPC are not moderate conservatives. They are the angry men who believe liberals, feminists, transgender people, brown immigrants and indigenous people stole their power.
Why do they believe that white men are entitled to the top of the hierarchy? Because idiots like this are getting amplified by the algorithm on social media. Politicians are echoing more palatable versions of this narrative on university and college campuses.
An American grocery/gas station billionaire, whose funds are keeping Canadian poultry out of the American market & other foreign markets because of bird flu infection risks, has been donating to the legal challenge against the federal govt’s authority to regulate.
Let it sink in. All the way.
An American billionaire is funding an effort to remove the legal authority of a sovereign nation, using its own court system.
He also says we are “all Americans”. Presumably is a reference to 51st state ambitions.
The gaffe was permitting people outside of the radicalized far right echo chamber to watch the video.
This introduction of Christian Nationalist “alternate reality” is not a gaffe. It was intentional. A deliberate attempt to normalize intolerable beliefs.
We can all see now how those stuck in the con echo chamber are radicalized.
What if the video was only circulated within the con insulated environment? What if working class and middle income voters are continuously exposed to this gaslighting & disinformation?
Well, that is what is happening. Egregious lies about crimes being committed and “deep state” coverups have become the common fodder sustaining the conservative support base.
It’s no longer a mystery what cons are telling their supporters.
You are NOT Christian if you believe Jesus wants you to load people with brown skin into a vehicle to be deported from the US because they’re not white.
Believing Jesus wants you to force brown people out of US is fascist totalitarianism or palingenetic ultranationalism.
But it’s NOT Christian. JESUS was not in favour of judgement nor violence. “He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone”. John 8:7
Even as he was dying on the cross, he asked for forgiveness for those who had sinned against him.
Luke 23:34
Forgiveness, compassion, love and generosity are Christian values. Not retribution. Not evil committed in Jesus’s name.