@ipoliticsca Why is it that climate advocates don’t realize that a minority government is a weakened position to implement these measures?
Do these opinion writers not understand how legislation is made in Canada? Do they not understand the limits our constitution?
@ipoliticsca I don’t believe they do. Or if they do, they’re actively confusing those who don’t for political gain.
Provinces hold purview over natural resources in Canada.
The Supreme Court basically just ruled that the federal government has jurisdiction to reduce carbon outputs.
@ipoliticsca Until that SCOC decision, several premiers blocked any meaningful legislation because of ideological values contrary to climate change reality.
But the door is now open for feds to implement some of those policies and measures to stave off climate catastrophe.
@ipoliticsca At the same time, we have covid, economic depression and hostile conservatives blocking any legislation in the senate.
Which the election of a minority government ensured the chairman of many of the committees remained conservative or became conservative.
@ipoliticsca Not only does the executive branch have the responsibility to table and champion climate measures legislation in house committees, they now have an uphill battle to gain support in senate committees.
Which a majority government would have been positioned to do more effectively.
@ipoliticsca You want to know why it’s so difficult to get climate change legislation passed and enacted? Because we have opposition parties more concerned about obtaining political power than climate realities.
Both NDP and GPC advocated PR and vote your conscience.
@ipoliticsca I have no doubt both Singh and May knew exactly how legislation is tabled and moves through the house and senate with multiple people influencing the final text.
Both are lawyers and experienced politicians.
Both pursued their political ambitions over climate change.
@ipoliticsca And delivered a minority government where they could attempt to gain political sway over legislation.
Neither of course considering the vehement opposition from federal and provincial conservatives and about 35% of voting Canadians.
@ipoliticsca Let’s hope the next election doesn’t produce the same result. Because if it does, Canada’s ambitions of becoming a green power will be lost in the ambitious pursuit of power for power’s sake.
@ipoliticsca It would be helpful if opinion writers would at least examine this aspect before opining that we haven’t advanced much on the climate file.
We’ve advanced significantly since 2015. Despite the power ambitions of flakey opposition leaders seeking to feather their own crowns.
Before putting out such a controversial post about a convoy leader vilified and criticized for his crass remarks and bigoted beliefs, you should check for a legal opinion of what this means.
There are a lot of Canadians angry about his sentence.
Is Pat King let off the hook for the biggest constitutional challenge in our collective lifetimes; the alleged attempted coup d’état of the duly elected Liberal federal government 3 months post election?
Or did his sentencing delay include time for him to be “Queen for a day”?
I don’t know the answer to that question. But then, none of us but the judge, defence council and prosecutor do.
It’s winter. I get that Canadians are a bit impatient waiting for the spring to emerge. Americans even more so.
“The destruction of a nation or of an ethnic group by means such as "the disintegration of its political and social institutions, of its culture, language, national feelings, religion, and its economic existence”.
Same thing happened when Ottawa sent immigrants to AB & SK.
The people who came to western Canada didn’t know they were being exploited as place holders to keep Americans from invading the territory.
They appreciated the opportunity to become land owners. It didn’t matter if they were subsistence farmers, they got to own stolen land.
It means we must play smarter and stop delivering the expected negative behaviour.
It means we must use critical thinking.
Trump wants to establish the belief that Canada’s LPC government is promoting drug trafficking.
That’s absurd of course, but we’re in a hybrid info war.
Resistance to Trump’s demands for border security reinforces that narrative in his supporters. The more the left resists, the more Trump’s supporters are convinced it’s true.
Hillier is Canada’s Michael Flynn. So a different “czar” is required.
How much foreign funding was used to elect UCP to a majority? And does that funding negate the entire election’s results because a foreign source paid to influence voters. Specifically Christian Nationalist voters.
Doesn’t this put us in a similar position as Romania?
A foreign funded campaign appealing to Manichean interpretation of traditionalism: “far-right contestation prevails: pro-Europeans versus sovereigntists, Westernisers versus patriots, elites versus the people”.