@ipoliticsca Why is it that climate advocates don’t realize that a minority government is a weakened position to implement these measures?
Do these opinion writers not understand how legislation is made in Canada? Do they not understand the limits our constitution?
@ipoliticsca I don’t believe they do. Or if they do, they’re actively confusing those who don’t for political gain.
Provinces hold purview over natural resources in Canada.
The Supreme Court basically just ruled that the federal government has jurisdiction to reduce carbon outputs.
@ipoliticsca Until that SCOC decision, several premiers blocked any meaningful legislation because of ideological values contrary to climate change reality.
But the door is now open for feds to implement some of those policies and measures to stave off climate catastrophe.
@ipoliticsca At the same time, we have covid, economic depression and hostile conservatives blocking any legislation in the senate.
Which the election of a minority government ensured the chairman of many of the committees remained conservative or became conservative.
@ipoliticsca Not only does the executive branch have the responsibility to table and champion climate measures legislation in house committees, they now have an uphill battle to gain support in senate committees.
Which a majority government would have been positioned to do more effectively.
@ipoliticsca You want to know why it’s so difficult to get climate change legislation passed and enacted? Because we have opposition parties more concerned about obtaining political power than climate realities.
Both NDP and GPC advocated PR and vote your conscience.
@ipoliticsca I have no doubt both Singh and May knew exactly how legislation is tabled and moves through the house and senate with multiple people influencing the final text.
Both are lawyers and experienced politicians.
Both pursued their political ambitions over climate change.
@ipoliticsca And delivered a minority government where they could attempt to gain political sway over legislation.
Neither of course considering the vehement opposition from federal and provincial conservatives and about 35% of voting Canadians.
@ipoliticsca Let’s hope the next election doesn’t produce the same result. Because if it does, Canada’s ambitions of becoming a green power will be lost in the ambitious pursuit of power for power’s sake.
@ipoliticsca It would be helpful if opinion writers would at least examine this aspect before opining that we haven’t advanced much on the climate file.
We’ve advanced significantly since 2015. Despite the power ambitions of flakey opposition leaders seeking to feather their own crowns.
This is someone who is trying to get people to not vote.
Do not buy their bogus arguments.
In case you think I’m overreacting…
These are people trying to demoralize voters who have indicated a preference for the liberal party because of Trump. Because it’s clear LPC and PMMC are in majority party territory.
So this narrative is targeting the soft voter support.
People who don’t typically vote Liberal but feel motivated by fear to lend PMMC support to prevent a calamity like US annexation.
Typically that would be NDP voters and centrist conservatives.
Trump & his international conspirators are seeking to create a minority government.
But sure, Oxford’s standards are so weak they gave Carney a PhD without vetting his dissertation and it’s only come to be recognized as problematic 30 years later by Canadian cons desperately seeking a compromising narrative with which to smear PMMC during a federal campaign.
That accusation seems reasonable to some people? 🤪🤔🤭
Who? People who don’t have post secondary degrees or didn’t finish high school? That’s not disrespect. I have no expectations that those who don’t value educational achievement would appreciate the significance of Oxford.
When you look at this map and the corresponding commentary, it at first glance seems ridiculous and vapid to assume this is what Trump is working towards.
But that’s only if you ignore that we are currently in a major reset of global power dynamics and shifting of world order.
What most human beings ignore is that it’s not money that signifies power. It’s control of trade. Not trade itself, but control of trade routes, trade tariffs & trade barriers.
A review of history tells this is blatantly true.
It’s not technological advancement, it’s trade.
Assyria was undeniably the first empire controlling vast amounts of trade across the Fertile Crescent and beyond. Their wealth was unparalleled. We still use Sumerian number systems Assyria used for time & angles as well, the efficiency of bureaucracy they developed.
There were policies proposed in the last budget update which were problematic for more people than just Freeland.
The focus of labour parties is often only on workers. But the governing Liberal party must govern for all citizens, not just workers.
ALL CITIZENS!
Punishing those who own capital is not going to solve problems. It’s going to make them worse.
But that’s what the price of supplying confidence votes had become; abandoning liberal beliefs and values for Marxist principles. Except Liberals are not Marxists.
Before putting out such a controversial post about a convoy leader vilified and criticized for his crass remarks and bigoted beliefs, you should check for a legal opinion of what this means.
There are a lot of Canadians angry about his sentence.
Is Pat King let off the hook for the biggest constitutional challenge in our collective lifetimes; the alleged attempted coup d’état of the duly elected Liberal federal government 3 months post election?
Or did his sentencing delay include time for him to be “Queen for a day”?
I don’t know the answer to that question. But then, none of us but the judge, defence council and prosecutor do.
It’s winter. I get that Canadians are a bit impatient waiting for the spring to emerge. Americans even more so.