@ipoliticsca Why is it that climate advocates don’t realize that a minority government is a weakened position to implement these measures?
Do these opinion writers not understand how legislation is made in Canada? Do they not understand the limits our constitution?
@ipoliticsca I don’t believe they do. Or if they do, they’re actively confusing those who don’t for political gain.
Provinces hold purview over natural resources in Canada.
The Supreme Court basically just ruled that the federal government has jurisdiction to reduce carbon outputs.
@ipoliticsca Until that SCOC decision, several premiers blocked any meaningful legislation because of ideological values contrary to climate change reality.
But the door is now open for feds to implement some of those policies and measures to stave off climate catastrophe.
@ipoliticsca At the same time, we have covid, economic depression and hostile conservatives blocking any legislation in the senate.
Which the election of a minority government ensured the chairman of many of the committees remained conservative or became conservative.
@ipoliticsca Not only does the executive branch have the responsibility to table and champion climate measures legislation in house committees, they now have an uphill battle to gain support in senate committees.
Which a majority government would have been positioned to do more effectively.
@ipoliticsca You want to know why it’s so difficult to get climate change legislation passed and enacted? Because we have opposition parties more concerned about obtaining political power than climate realities.
Both NDP and GPC advocated PR and vote your conscience.
@ipoliticsca I have no doubt both Singh and May knew exactly how legislation is tabled and moves through the house and senate with multiple people influencing the final text.
Both are lawyers and experienced politicians.
Both pursued their political ambitions over climate change.
@ipoliticsca And delivered a minority government where they could attempt to gain political sway over legislation.
Neither of course considering the vehement opposition from federal and provincial conservatives and about 35% of voting Canadians.
@ipoliticsca Let’s hope the next election doesn’t produce the same result. Because if it does, Canada’s ambitions of becoming a green power will be lost in the ambitious pursuit of power for power’s sake.
@ipoliticsca It would be helpful if opinion writers would at least examine this aspect before opining that we haven’t advanced much on the climate file.
We’ve advanced significantly since 2015. Despite the power ambitions of flakey opposition leaders seeking to feather their own crowns.
This isn’t just whining. It’s Christian nationalists laying the groundwork for theocratic government.
Charlie Kirk is a martyr to evangelical Christo-fascists in the US and now this Alberta online influencer is touting his belief in Kirk’s brand of Christianity.
The public asks why Poilievre is an unrepentant bigot and brute leader.
This is why. The people voting for CPC are not moderate conservatives. They are the angry men who believe liberals, feminists, transgender people, brown immigrants and indigenous people stole their power.
Why do they believe that white men are entitled to the top of the hierarchy? Because idiots like this are getting amplified by the algorithm on social media. Politicians are echoing more palatable versions of this narrative on university and college campuses.
An American grocery/gas station billionaire, whose funds are keeping Canadian poultry out of the American market & other foreign markets because of bird flu infection risks, has been donating to the legal challenge against the federal govt’s authority to regulate.
Let it sink in. All the way.
An American billionaire is funding an effort to remove the legal authority of a sovereign nation, using its own court system.
He also says we are “all Americans”. Presumably is a reference to 51st state ambitions.
The gaffe was permitting people outside of the radicalized far right echo chamber to watch the video.
This introduction of Christian Nationalist “alternate reality” is not a gaffe. It was intentional. A deliberate attempt to normalize intolerable beliefs.
We can all see now how those stuck in the con echo chamber are radicalized.
What if the video was only circulated within the con insulated environment? What if working class and middle income voters are continuously exposed to this gaslighting & disinformation?
Well, that is what is happening. Egregious lies about crimes being committed and “deep state” coverups have become the common fodder sustaining the conservative support base.
It’s no longer a mystery what cons are telling their supporters.
You are NOT Christian if you believe Jesus wants you to load people with brown skin into a vehicle to be deported from the US because they’re not white.
Believing Jesus wants you to force brown people out of US is fascist totalitarianism or palingenetic ultranationalism.
But it’s NOT Christian. JESUS was not in favour of judgement nor violence. “He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone”. John 8:7
Even as he was dying on the cross, he asked for forgiveness for those who had sinned against him.
Luke 23:34
Forgiveness, compassion, love and generosity are Christian values. Not retribution. Not evil committed in Jesus’s name.
I’m flabbergasted that so many people continue to believe this is about freedom of speech or expression.
Trump has moved beyond speech with the assistance of Project 2025.
He’s attacking freedom of thought.
In a coordinated attack, Trump, Christian nationalists and white supremacists are eliminating the public’s right to freedom of thought by eliminating all forms of factual information.
By making truth unknowable, Trump then tells the public what to think.
Dissenters aren’t being removed for mere speech violations. It’s for promoting independent thought based on verifiable facts.
Trump started this attack on free thought in 2016 at his inauguration. He forced Sean Spicer to proclaim his crowd was bigger than Obama’s.