Ty Beal Profile picture
27 May, 4 tweets, 2 min read
Excellent podcast with @NutritionDanny and @KevinH_PhD

Love Kevin’s advice at the end: love each other, exercise, and limit ultra-processed foods
sigmanutrition.com/episode376/
Important distinctions between the two groups in this study: the low-carb diet had nearly double the energy density (2.1 v 1.1), lower fiber (9 g v 31 g), & a higher proportion of energy from ultra-processed foods (32% v 26%) compared with the low-fat diet.nature.com/articles/s4159…
Yet both groups lost weight, & there was no significant differences in weight loss or fat loss between the two groups. So I think most people could maintain a healthy body weight on a variety of macronutrient ratios, animal-to-plant-source food ratios, & diets. Diet quality key.
And of course, much higher sugar, carb, and glycemic index and load in the low-fat diet.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ty Beal

Ty Beal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TyRBeal

30 May
Optimal sources of iron, zinc, calcium, folate, vitamin A & B12 are organs, small dried fish, cheese, beef/goat, eggs & dark leafy greens

Shows grams & kcals needed to provide 1/3 of recommended intakes for pregnant women

Nutrient density rating is preliminary & explained below Image
Foods with optimal nutrient density provide an average of 33.3% of recommended intakes with ≤ 16.7% of both energy (2,583 kcal) and mass (1987 g) recommended intakes (assuming an energy density of 1.3 kcal/g).
Foods with high nutrient density provide an average of 33.3% of recommended intakes with ≤ 33.3% of both energy and mass recommended intakes and with < 16.7% of either energy or mass recommended intakes.
Read 12 tweets
10 Mar
🚀 Now launched!

New supplement by @GAINAlliance & @UNICEF provides evidence-based findings on nutrient gaps & affordability

Read it here 👉🏼 academic.oup.com/nutritionrevie…

Read this thread for the key findings & implications 👇🏼

@UNICEFAfrica @UNICEFEthiopia @UNICEFROSA @UNICEFIndia •	The majority of young children in Eastern and Southern A
First, check out the related country briefs

Comprehensive Nutrient Gap Assessment (CONGA)
👉🏼 gainhealth.org/resources/repo…

Affordability analysis
👉🏼 gainhealth.org/resources/repo…
I won't bore you with the methods, but there's an entire paper on the CONGA method, if interested
👉🏼 academic.oup.com/nutritionrevie…
Read 36 tweets
12 Feb
The case for animal source foods Image
Animal source foods are evolutionarily appropriate Image
Micronutrient deficiencies are common in populations with low animal source food intake Image
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(